Sources of mercury exposure for U.S. seafood consumers: Implications for policy

Environmental Health Perspectives

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 137-143

  Selin, Noelle E ^a   Sunderland, Elsie M ^b   Knightes, Christopher D ^c   Mason, Robert P ^d  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Biogeochemical cycling; Exposure; Mercury; Seafood

Indexed keywords

MERCURY; METHYLMERCURY;

ARTICLE; BIOACCUMULATION; CHEMISTRY; FISH; FOOD INTAKE; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; MARKET; NONHUMAN; NORTH AMERICA; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEA FOOD; SIMULATION; UNITED STATES;

AIR POLLUTANTS; ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION; FOOD CONTAMINATION; FRESH WATER; HUMANS; MERCURY; METHYLMERCURY COMPOUNDS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PUBLIC POLICY; SEAFOOD; UNITED STATES; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 77149143826     PISSN: 00916765     EISSN: 15529924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0900811     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ambrose R, Tsiros IX, Wool TA. 2005. Modeling mercury fluxes and concentrations in a Georgia watershed receiving atmospheric deposition load from direct and indirect sources. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 55(5):547-558.
2. Barber MC. 2006. Bioaccumulation and Aquatic System Simulator (BASS) User's Manual Version 2.2. EPA/600/R-01/035. Athens, GA:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
3. Brown S, Saito L, Knightes C, Gustin M. 2007. Calibration and evaluation of a mercury model for a western stream and constructed wetland. Water Air Soil Poll 182:275-290.
4. Burger J, Gochfeld M. 2004. Mercury in canned tuna: white versus light and temporal variation. Environ Res 96(3):239-249.
5. Butler TJ, Cohen MD, Vermeylen FM, Likens GE, Schmeltz D, Artz RS. 2008. Regional precipitation mercury trends in the eastern USA, 1998-2005: declines in the Northeast and Midwest, no trend in the Southeast. Atmos Environ 42(7):1582-1592.
6. Carrington CD, Montwill B, Bolger PM. 2004. An intervention analysis for the reduction of exposure to methylmercury from the consumption of seafood by women of child-bearing age. Regul Toxicol Pharm 40(3):272-280.
7. Choy CA, Popp BN, Kaneko JJ, Drazen JC. 2009. The influence of depth on mercury levels in pelagic fishes and their prey. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 106(33):13865-13869.
8. Cohen M, Artz R, Draxler R, Miller P, Poissant L, Niemi D, et al. 2004. Modeling the atmospheric transport and deposition of mercury to the Great Lakes. Environ Res 95(3):247-265.
9. Cossa D, Averty B, Pirrone N. 2009. The origin of methyl mercury in open Mediterranean waters. Limnol Oceanogr 54(3):837-844.
10. Greenfield J, Dai T, Manguerra H. 2002. Watershed modeling extensions of the watershed characterization system. In: Proceedings, Water Environment Federation Specialty Conference: Watersheds, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA, 532-535.
11. Hammerschmidt C, Fitzgerald W. 2006. Methylmercury cycling in sediments on the continental shelf of southern New England. Geochim Cosmochim Act 70(4):918-930.
12. Harris RC, Rudd JWM, Amyot M, Babiarz CL, Beaty KG, Blanchfield PJ, et al. 2007. Whole-ecosystem study shows rapid fish-mercury response to changes in mercury deposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:16586-16591.
13. Hollweg TA, Gilmour CC, Mason RP. 2009. Biogeochemical controls over methylmercury production in the mid-Atlantic coastal region. Mar Chem 114:86-101.
14. IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva:Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
15. Kirk JL, St Louis V, Hintelmann H, Lehnherr I, Else B, Poissant L. 2008. Methylated mercury species in marine waters of the Canadian high and sub Arctic. Environ Sci Technol 42(22):8367-8373.
16. Knightes CD. 2008. Development and test application of a screening-level mercury fate model and tool for evaluating wildlife exposure risk for surface waters with mercury-contaminated sediments (SERAFM). Environ Model Software 23:495-510.
17. Knightes CD, Sunderland EM, Barber MC, Johnston JM, Ambrose RB Jr. 2009. Application of ecosystem-scale fate and bioaccumulation models to predict fish mercury response times to changes in atmospheric deposition. Environ Toxicol Chem 28(4):881-893.
18. Kotnik J, Horvat M, Tessier E, Ogrinc N, Monperrus M, Amouroux D, et al. 2007. Mercury speciation in surface and deep waters of the Mediterranean Sea. Mar Chem 107(1):13-30.
19. Lamborg CH, Fitzgerald WF, O'Donnell J, Torgersen T. 2002. A nonsteady-state compartmental model of global-scale mercury biogeochemistry with interhemispheric atmospheric gradients. Geochim Cosmochim Act 66(7):1105-1118.
20. Lin C-J, Pongprueksa P, Lindberg SE, Pehkonen SO, Byun D, Jang C. 2006. Scientific uncertainties in atmospheric mercury models I: model science evaluation. Atmos Environ 40:2911-2928.
21. Mahaffey KR, Clickner RP, Bodurow CC. 2004. Blood organic mercury and dietary mercury intake: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 and 2000. Environ Health Perspect 112:562-570.
22. Mason RP, Abbott ML, Bodaly RA, Bullock OR Jr, Evers D, Lindberg SE, et al. 2005. Monitoring the response to changing mercury deposition. Environ Sci Technol 39(1):14A-22A.
23. Mason RP, Fitzgerald WF. 1990. Alkylmercury species in the equatorial Pacific. Nature 347:457-459.
24. Mason RP, Rolfhus KR, Fitzgerald WF. 1998. Mercury in the North Atlantic. Mar Chem 61(1-2):37-53.
25. Mason RP, Sheu GR. 2002. Role of the ocean in the global mercury cycle. Global Biogeochem Cycles 16(4):1093.
26. Mason RP, Sullivan KA. 1999. The distribution and speciation of mercury in the South and equatorial Atlantic. Deep Sea Res II 46:937-956.
27. Mergler D, Anderson HA, Chan LHM, Mahaffey KR, Murray M, Sakamoto M, et al. 2007. Methylmercury exposure and health effects in humans: a worldwide concern. Ambio 36(1):3-11.
28. Moya J. 2004. Overview of fish consumption rates in the United States. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 10(6):1195-1211.
29. Munthe J, Bodaly RA, Branfireun BA, Driscoll CT, Gilmour CC, Harris R, et al. 2007. Recovery of mercury-contaminated fisheries. Ambio 36(1):33-44.
30. National Atmospheric Deposition Program. 2009. Mercury Deposition Network (MDN): A NADP Network. Champaign, IL:NADP Program Office, Illinois State Water Survey.
31. National Marine Fisheries Service. 2007. Fisheries of the United States 2006. Silver Spring, MD:National Marine Fisheries Service, Fisheries Statistics and Economics Division.
32. National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC:National Academies Press.
33. Pacyna EG, Pacyna JM, Steenhuisen F, Wilson S. 2006. Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000. Atmos Environ 40(22):4048-4063.
34. Pielke RA. 1998. Rethinking the role of adaptation in climate policy. Global Environ Chang 8(2):159-170.
35. Pongprueksa P, Lin CJ, Lindberg SE, Jang C, Braverman T, Bullock OR Jr, et al. 2008. Scientific uncertainties in atmospheric mercury models III: boundary and initial conditions, model grid resolution, and Hg (II) reduction mechanism. Atmos Environ 42(8):1828-1845.
36. Rice G, Hammitt JK, Amar PK. 2005. Economic Valuation of Human Health Benefits of Controlling Mercury Emissions from U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants. Boston, MA:Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management.
37. Seigneur C, Vijayaraghavan K, Lohman K, Karamchandani P, Scott C. 2004. Global source attribution for mercury deposition in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 38(2):555-569.
38. Selin NE, Jacob DJ. 2008. Seasonal and spatial patterns of mercury wet deposition in the United States: constraints on the contribution from North American anthropogenic sources. Atmos Environ 42(21):5193-5204.
39. Selin NE, Jacob DJ, Park RJ, Yantosca RM, Strode S, Jaeglé L, et al. 2007. Chemical cycling and deposition of atmospheric mercury: global constraints from observations. J Geophys Res Atmos 112:D02308.
40. Selin NE, Jacob DJ, Yantosca RM, Strode S, Jaeglé L, Sunderland EM. 2008. Global 3-D land-ocean-atmosphere model for mercury: present-day versus preindustrial cycles and anthropogenic enrichment factors for deposition. Global Biogeochem Cycles 22:GB2011.
41. Selin NE, Selin H. 2006. Global politics of mercury pollution: the need for multi-scale governance. Rev Eur Commun Int Environ Law 15(3):258-269.
42. Stern AH, Gochfeld M, Weisel C, Burger J. 2001. Mercury and methylmercury exposure in the New Jersey pregnant population. Arch Environ Health 56(1):4-10.
43. Streets DG, Zhang Q, Wu Y. 2009. Projection of global mercury emissions in 2050. Environ Sci Technol 43:2983-2988.
44. Sunderland EM. 2007. Mercury exposure from domestic and imported estuarine and marine fish in the U.S. seafood market. Environ Health Perspect 115:235-242.
45. Sunderland EM, Cohen M, Selin NE, Chmura GL. 2008. Reconciling models and measurements to assess trends in atmospheric mercury deposition. Environ Pollut 156:526-535.
46. Sunderland EM, Krabbenhoft DP, Moreau JM, Strode SA, Landing WM. 2009. Mercury sources, distribution and bioavailability in the North Pacific Ocean: insights from data and models. Global Biogeochem Cycles 23:GB2010.
47. Sunderland EM, Mason RP. 2007. Human impacts on open ocean mercury concentrations. Global Biogeochem Cycles 21:GB4022.
48. Swain EB, Jakus PM, Rice G, Lupi F, Maxson PA, Pacyna JM, et al. 2007. Socioeconomic consequences of mercury use and pollution. Ambio 36(1):45-61.
49. Trasande L, Landrigan PJ, Schechter C. 2005. Public health and economic consequences of methyl mercury toxicity to the developing brain. Environ Health Perspect 113:590-596.
50. Trasande L, Schechter CB, Haynes KA, Landrigan PJ. 2006. Mental retardation and prenatal methylmercury toxicity. Am J Ind Med 49(3):153-158.
51. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. EPA. 2004. What You Need to Know about Mercury in Fish and Shellfish: 2004 EPA and FDA Advice for: Women Who Might Become Pregnant, Women Who Are Pregnant, Nursing Mothers, Young Children. EPA-823-R-04-005. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
52. U.S. EPA. 1997a. Mercury Study Report to Congress Volume III: Fate and Transport of Mercury in the Environment. EPA-452/R-97-005. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
53. U.S. EPA. 1997b. Exposure Factors Handbook Volume II. EPA/600/P-95/002Fb. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
54. U.S. EPA. 2005. Regulatory Impact Analysis of the Final Clean Air Mercury Rule. EPA-452/R-05-003. Research Triangle Park, NC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
55. U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2009. Exposure Assessment Models. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ ceampubl/products.html [accessed 1 December 2009].