Probabilistic assessment of regional mercury exposure

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

Volumn 97, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 159-168

  Seigneur, C ^a   Pai, P ^a   Gerath, M ^b,c   Mitchell, D ^b   Hamby, G ^b   Gong, G ^b   Whipple, C ^d   Levin, L ^e  

^a AER Inc   (United States)

^b ENSR   (United States)

^c Ogden   (United States)

^d ICF Engineering & Construction Group   (United States)

^e ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

REGIONAL MERCURY EXPOSURE;

ATMOSPHERIC MOVEMENTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HAZARDOUS MATERIALS; HEALTH HAZARDS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MERCURY (METAL); PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; WATER POLLUTION;

AIR POLLUTION;

MERCURY;

MERCURY; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; POLLUTION MONITORING; PROBABILISTIC APPROACH; REGIONAL POLLUTION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

CONFERENCE PAPER; FISH; FOOD CONTAMINATION; HEALTH HAZARD; PREDICTION; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; WATER CONTAMINATION;

USA, GREAT LAKES;

EID: 0031170908     PISSN: 00496979     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1018375515201     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. AIHC: 1994, Exposure Factors Sourcebook, American Industrial Health Council, Washington, D.C.
2. Allan, M. A., Levin, L., Porcella, D., Silvers, A., Wyzga, R., Chang, R., Chu, P., Nott, B., Owens, D. and Toole-O'Neil, B.: 1994, Electric Utility Trace Substances Synthesis Report, Vol. 3, Appendix O, Mercury in the Environment, TR-104614-V3, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California.
3. Brainard, J, and Burmaster, D.: 1992, Risk Analysis, 12, 267-275.
4. Constantinou, E., Gerath, M., Mitchell, D., Seigneur, C. and Levin, L.: 1995a. Water Air Soil Pollut., 80, 1129-1138.
5. Constantinou, E., Wu, X, A. and Seigneur, C.: 1995b, Water Air Soil Pollut., 80, 325-335.
6. Day, R.: 1996, Electronic data base, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Lansing, Michigan.
7. Decisioneering, Inc.: 1996, Crystal Ball for Windows, User's Manual.
8. Ebert, E. S., Harrington, N. W., Boyle, K. J., Knight, J. W. and Keenan, R. E.: 1993, North American J. Fisheries Manag., 13, 737-745.
9. EPA: 1995, Exposure Factors Handbook, draft, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
10. EPA: 1996, Mercury Study Report to Congress, Appendix H, EPA-452/R-96-001, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
11. Harris, R., Gherini, S. and Hudson, R.: 1996, Regional Mercury Cycling Model: A Model for Mercury Cycling in Lakes, R-MCM Version 1.0, Draft User Guide and Technical Reference, prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, TetraTech, Inc., Lafayette, California.
12. Hoover, S., Hill, R. and Watson, T,: 1997, Water Air Soil Pollut., in press.
13. Lipfert, F. W., Moskowitz, P. D., Fthenakis, V. and Saroff, L.: 1996, Neurotox., 17, 197-212.
14. Mitchell, D., Mounce, T., Hamby, G., Chia, G., Abeck, H., Vertucci, F. and Seigneur, C.: 1995, Regional Limnological Database for Mercury Cycling Modeling, Report No. 2460-025-700 to the Electric Power Research Institute. ENSR. Acton. Massachusetts.
15. Pai, P., Karamchandani, P. and Seigneur, C.: 1997, Atmos. Environ., in press.
16. Sekerke, H. J., Denger, R. L., Adams, C. M. and Moss, S. D.: 1994, Abstract No. 563, Society of Toxicology 33rd Annual Meeting.
17. Soldat, J. K.: 1970, in Environmental Surveillance in the Vicinity of Nuclear Facilities, Rienig, W. C., ed., Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, 302-308.