Selectivity of face distortion aftereffects for differences in expression or gender

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue JAN, 2012, Pages

  Tillman, Megan A ^a   Webster, Michael A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Aftereffects; Face perception; Facial expressions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867122835     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00014     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adams, W. J., Gray, K. L., Garner, M., and Graf, E. W. (2010). High-level face adaptation without awareness. Psychol. Sci. 21, 205-210.
2. Adams, W. J., Gray, K. L., Garner, M., and Graf, E. W. (2011). On the "special" status of emotional faces. Comment on Yang, Hong, and Blake (2010). J. Vis. 11(3): 10, 1-4.
3. Afraz, A., and Cavanagh, P. (2009). The gender-specific face aftereffect is based in retinotopic not spatiotopic coordinates across several natural image transformations. J. Vis. 9(10): 10, 11-17.
4. Afraz, S. R., and Cavanagh, P. (2008). Retinotopy of the face aftereffect. Vision Res. 48, 42-54.
5. Andrews, T. J., and Ewbank, M. P. (2004). Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe. Neuroimage 23, 905-913.
6. Atkinson, A. P., Tipples, J., Burt, D. M., and Young, A. W. (2005). Asymmetric interference between sex and emotion in face perception. Percept. Psychophys. 67, 1199-1213.
7. Barrett, S. E., and O'Toole, A. J. (2009). Face adaptation to gender: does adaptation transfer across age categories? Vis. Cogn. 17, 700-715.
8. Benton, C. P., and Burgess, E. C. (2008). The direction of measured face aftereffects. J. Vis. 8(15): 1, 1-6.
9. Bestelmeyer, P. E. G., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Perrett, D. I., Schneider, A., Welling, L. L. M., and Conway, C.A. (2008). Sexcontingent face aftereffects depend on perceptual category rather than structural encoding. Cognition 107, 353-365.
10. Bestelmeyer, P. E. G., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., and Welling, L. L. M. (2009). Face aftereffects suggest interdependent processing of expression and sex and of expression and race. Vis. Cogn. 18, 255-274.
11. Bruce, V., and Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. Br. J. Psychol. 77(Pt 3), 305-327.
12. Butler, A., Oruc, I., Fox, C. J., and Barton, J. J. (2008). Factors contributing to the adaptation aftereffects of facial expression. Brain Res. 1191, 116-126.
13. Calder, A. J., and Young, A. W. (2005). Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 641-651.
14. Cook, R., Matei, M., and Johnston, A. (2011). Exploring expression space: adaptation to orthogonal and antiexpressions. J. Vis. 11(4): 2, 1-9.
15. Davidenko, N., Witthoft, N., and Winawer, J. (2008). Gender aftereffects in face silhouettes reveal facespecific mechanisms. Vis. Cogn. 16, 99-103.
16. Dickinson, J. E., Almeida, R. A., Bell, J., and Badcock, D. R. (2010). Global shape aftereffects have a local substrate: A tilt aftereffect field. J. Vis. 10(13): 5, 1-12.
17. Ellamil, M., Susskind, J. M., and Anderson, A. K. (2008). Examinations of identity invariance in facial expression adaptation. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 8, 273-281.
18. Fox, C. J., and Barton, J. J. (2007). What is adapted in face adaptation? The neural representations of expression in the human visual system. Brain Res. 1127, 80-89.
19. Fox, C. J., Oruc, I., and Barton, J. J. (2008). It doesn't matter how you feel. The facial identity aftereffect is invariant to changes in facial expression. J. Vis. 8(3): 11, 1-13.
20. Ghuman, A. S., McDaniel, J. R., and Martin, A. (2010). Face adaptation without a face. Curr. Biol. 20, 32-36.
21. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., and Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 4, 223-233.
22. Hole, G. J. (2011). Identity-specific face adaptation effects: evidence for abstractive face representations. Cognition 119, 216-228.
23. Hole, G. J., George, P. A., Eaves, K., and Rasek, A. (2002). Effects of geometric distortions on face-recognition performance. Perception 31, 1221-1240.
24. Hsu, S. M., and Young, A. W. (2004). Adaptation effects in facial expression recognition. Vis. Cogn. 11, 871-899.
25. Jaquet, E., and Rhodes, G. (2008). Face aftereffects indicate dissociable, but not distinct, coding of male and female faces. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 34, 101-112.
26. Jaquet, E., Rhodes, G., and Hayward, W. G. (2008). Race-contingent aftereffects suggest distinct perceptual norms for different race faces. Vis. Cogn. 16, 734-753.
27. Jones, B. C., Feinberg, D. R., Bestelmeyer, P. E., Debruine, L. M., and Little, A. C. (2010). Adaptation to different mouth shapes influences visual perception of ambiguous lip speech. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 17, 522-528.
28. Langner, O., Dotsch, R., Bijlstra, G., Wigboldus, D. H. J., Hawk, S. T., and Knippenberg, A. (2010). Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cogn. Emot. 24, 1377-1388.
29. Leopold, D. A., O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., and Blanz, V. (2001). Prototypereferenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 89-94.
30. Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., and Jones, B. C. (2005). Sex-contingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces. Proc. Biol. Sci. 272, 2283-2287.
31. Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., and Waitt, C. (2008). Category contingent aftereffects for faces of different races, ages and species. Cognition 106, 1537-1547.
32. Loffler, G., Yourganov, G., Wilkinson, F., and Wilson, H. R. (2005). fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1386-1390.
33. MacLin, O. H., and Webster, M. A. (2001). Influence of adaptation on the perception of distortions in natural images. J. Electron. Imaging 10, 100-109.
34. Moradi, F., Koch, C., and Shimojo, S. (2005). Face adaptation depends on seeing the face. Neuron 45, 169-175.
35. Neth, D., and Martinez, A. M. (2009). Emotion perception in emotionless face images suggests a norm-based representation. J. Vis. 9(1): 5, 1-11.
36. Ng, M., Ciaramitaro, V. M., Anstis, S., Boynton, G. M., and Fine, I. (2006). Selectivity for the configural cues that identify the gender, ethnicity, and identity of faces in human cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 19552-19557.
37. O'Neil, S., and Webster, M. A. (2011). Adaptation and the perception of facial age. Vis. Cogn. 19, 534-550.
38. Pell, P. J., and Richards, A. (2011). Crossemotion facial expression aftereffects. Vision Res. 51, 1889-1896.
39. Rhodes, G., and Jeffery, L. (2006). Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Res. 46, 2977-2987.
40. Robbins, R., McKone, E., and Edwards, M. (2007). Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: adapter position effects and neural models. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 33, 570-592.
41. Rotshtein, P., Henson, R. N., Treves, A., Driver, J., and Dolan, R. J. (2005). Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 107-113.
42. Rutherford, M. D., Chattha, H. M., and Krysko, K. M. (2008). The use of aftereffects in the study of relationships among emotion categories. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 34, 27-40.
43. Said, C. P., Haxby, J. V., and Todorov, A. (2011). Brain systems for assessing the affective value of faces. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 366, 1660-1670.
44. Schweinberger, S. R., Burton, A. M., and Kelly, S. W. (1999). Asymmetric dependencies in perceiving identity and emotion: experiments with morphed faces. Percept. Psychophys. 61, 1102-1115.
45. Schweinberger, S. R., and Soukup, G. R. (1998). Asymmetric relationships among perceptions of facial identity, emotion, and facial speech. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 1748-1765.
46. Schweinberger, S. R., Zaske, R., Walther, C., Golle, J., Kovacs, G., and Wiese, H. (2010). Young without plastic surgery: perceptual adaptation to the age of female and male faces. Vision Res. 50, 2570-2576.
47. Skinner, A. L., and Benton, C. P. (2010). Anti-expression aftereffects reveal prototype-referenced coding of facial expressions. Psychol. Sci. 21, 1248-1253.
48. Susilo, T., McKone, E., and Edwards, M. (2010). Solving the upside-down puzzle: why do upright and inverted face aftereffects look alike? J. Vis. 10(13): 1, 1-16.
49. Watson, T. L., and Clifford, C. W. G. (2003). Pulling faces: an investigation of the face-distortion aftereffect. Perception 32, 1109-1116.
50. Webster, M. A. (2011). Adaptation and visual coding. J. Vis. 11(5): 3, 1-23.
51. Webster, M. A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y., and Duhamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature 428, 557-561.
52. Webster, M. A., and MacLeod, D. I. A. (2011). Visual adaptation and face perception. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 366, 1702-1725.
53. Webster, M. A., and MacLin, O. H. (1999). Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 6, 647-653.
54. Webster, M. A., and Mollon, J. D. (1994). The influence of contrast adaptation on color appearance. Vision Res. 34, 1993-2020.
55. Yamashita, J. A., Hardy, J. L., De Valois, K. K., and Webster, M. A. (2005). Stimulus selectivity of figural aftereffects for faces. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31, 420-437.
56. Yang, E., Hong, S. W., and Blake, R. (2010). Adaptation aftereffects to facial expressions suppressed from visual awareness. J. Vis. 10(12): 24, 1-13.
57. Zhao, L., and Chubb, C. (2001). The size-tuning of the facedistortion after-effect. Vision Res. 41, 2979-2994.