Exploring expression space: Adaptation to orthogonal and anti-expressions

Journal of Vision

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1-9

  Cook, Richard ^a   Matei, Marana ^a   Johnston, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Facial expressions; Facial speech; Opponent coding; Principal component analysis

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960968786     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/11.4.1     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Hamann, S., Young, A.W., Calder, A. J., Phelps, E. A., et al. (1999). Recognition of facial emotion in nine individuals with bilateral amygdala damage. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1111-1117.
2. Anderson, A. K., Christoff, K., Panitz, D., De Rosa, E., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2003). Neural correlates of the automatic processing of threat facial signals. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 5627-5633.
3. Benton, C. P., Etchells, P. J., Porter, G., Clark, A. P., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Nikolov, S. G. (2007). Turning the other cheek: The viewpoint dependence of facial expression after-effects. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 2131-2137.
4. Berisha, F., Johnston, A., & McOwan, P. W. (2010). Identifying regions that carry the best information about global facial configurations. Journal of Vision, 10(11):27, 1-8, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/11/27, doi:10.1167/10.11.27. [PubMed] [Article]
5. Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-327.
6. Burton, A. M., Jenkins, R., Hancock, P. J., & White, D. (2005). Robust representations for face recognition: The power of averages. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 256-284.
7. Calder, A. J., Lawrence, A. D., & Young, A. W. (2001). Neuropsychology of fear and loathing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 352-363.
8. Calder, A. J., & Young, A. W. (2005). Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 641-651.
9. Clifford, C., & Rhodes, G. (Eds.) (2005). Fitting the mind to the world: Adaptation and aftereffects in high-level vision. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
11. Cowe, G. (2003). Example-based computer generated facial mimicry. London: University of London.
12. Critchley, H. D., Daly, E. M., Bullmore, E. T., Williams, S. C., Van Amelsvoort, T., Robertson, D. M., et al. (2000). The functional neuroanatomy of social behaviour: Changes in cerebral blood flow when people with autistic disorder process facial expressions. Brain, 123, 2203-2212.
13. Ekman, P. (1992a). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6, 169-200.
14. Ekman, P. (1992b). Are there basic emotions. Psychological Review, 99, 550-553.
15. Ellamil, M., Susskind, J. M., & Anderson, A. K. (2008). Examinations of identity invariance in facial expression adaptation. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 273-281.
16. Fox, C. J., & Barton, J. J. S. (2007). What is adapted in face adaptation? The neural representations of expression in the human visual system. Brain Research, 1127, 80-89.
17. Furl, N., Phillips, P. J., & O'Toole, A. J. (2002). Face recognition algorithms and the other-race effect: Computational mechanisms for a developmental contact hypothesis. Cognitive Science, 26, 797-815.
18. Ganel, T., Valyear, K. F., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., & Goodale, M. A. (2005). The involvement of the "fusiform face area" in processing facial expression. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1645-1654.
19. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 223-233.
20. Hefter, R. L., Manoach, D. S., & Barton, J. J. (2005). Perception of facial expression and facial identity in subjects with social developmental disorders. Neurology, 65, 1620-1625.
21. Hoffman, E. A., & Haxby, J. V. (2000). Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 80-84.
22. Hsu, S. M., & Young, A. W. (2004). Adaptation effects in facial expression recognition. Visual Cognition, 11, 871-899.
23. Johnston, A., McOwan, P. W., & Benton, C. P. (1999). Robust velocity computation from a biologically motivated model of motion perception. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 266, 509-518.
24. Johnston, A., McOwan, P. W., & Buxton, H. (1992). A computational model of the analysis of some firstorder and second-order motion patterns by simple and complex cells. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B: Biological Sciences, 250, 297-306.
25. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311.
26. Leopold, D. A., O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level after effects. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 89-94.
27. Leopold, D. A., Rhodes, G., Muller, K. M., & Jeffery, L. (2005). The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B: Biological Sciences, 272, 897-904.
28. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
29. Mollon, J. (1974). After-effects and the brain. New Scientist, 61, 479-482.
30. Puce, A., Allison, T., Bentin, S., Gore, J. C., &McCarthy, G. (1998). Temporal cortex activation in humans viewing eye and mouth movements. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 2188-2199.
31. Rhodes, G., & Jeffery, L. (2006). Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Research, 46, 2977-2987.
32. Rhodes, G., Watson, T. L., Jeffery, L., & Clifford, C. W. G. (2010). Perceptual adaptation helps us identify faces. Vision Research, 50, 963-968.
33. Rutherford, M. D., Chattha, H. M., & Krysko, K. M. (2008). The use of aftereffects in the study of relationships among emotion categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 27-40.
34. Skinner, A. L., & Benton, C. P. (2010). Anti-expression aftereffects reveal prototype-referenced coding of facial expressions. Psychological Science, 21, 1248-1253.
35. Susilo, T., McKone, E., & Edwards, M. (2010). What shape are the neural response functions underlying opponent coding in face space? A psychophysical investigation. Vision Research, 50, 300-314.
36. Sutherland, N. S. (1961). Figural aftereffects and apparent size. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 222-228.
37. Thompson, P., & Burr, D. (2009). Visual aftereffects. Current Biology, 19, R11-R14.
38. Webster, M. A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y., & Duhamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature, 428, 557-561.
39. Winston, J. S., Henson, R. N., Fine-Goulden, M. R., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 1830-1839.