Risk-Sensitivity in Bayesian Sensorimotor Integration

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2012, Pages

  Grau Moya, Jordi ^a,b   Ortega, Pedro A ^a,b   Braun, Daniel A ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTEGRATION; SENSORY FEEDBACK; STATISTICAL TESTS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BAYES-OPTIMAL; BAYESIAN; BAYESIAN INTEGRATION; DECISION MAKERS; DECISION-MAKING PROCESS; OPTIMAL DECISIONS; RISK SENSITIVITY; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; SENSORIMOTORS; UNCERTAINTY;

DECISION MAKING;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; SENSORY FEEDBACK; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; UNCERTAINTY; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

EID: 84866932531     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002698     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Faisal A, Selen L, Wolpert DM, (2008) Noise in the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 9: 292-303.
2. Doya K, Ishii S, Pouget A, Rao RPN, editors (2007) Bayesian Brain: Probabilistic Approaches to Neural Coding. Boston: MIT Press.
3. Knill DC, Pouget A, (2004) The bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci 27: 712-719.
4. Körding KP, Wolpert DM, (2004) Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 427: 244-247.
5. Körding KP, Wolpert DM, (2006) Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends Cogn Sci 10: 319-326.
6. Turnham EJA, Braun DA, Wolpert DM, (2011) Inferring visuomotor priors for sensorimotor learning. PLoS Comput Biol 7: e1001112.
7. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, van der Gon JJD, (1999) Integration of proprioceptive and visual positioninformation: An experimentally supported model. J Neurophysiol 81: 1355-1364.
8. Ernst MO, Banks MS, (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415: 429-433.
9. Girshick AR, Banks MS, (2009) Probabilistic combination of slant information: weighted averaging and robustness as optimal percepts. J Vision 9: 8.1-20.
10. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI, (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Int S Techn Pol Inn 269: 1880-1882.
11. Kawato M, (1999) Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9: 718-727.
12. Tin C, Poon CS, (2005) Internal models in sensorimotor integration: perspectives from adaptive control theory. J Neural Eng 2: S147.
13. Todorov E, Jordan MI, (2002) Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5: 1226-1235.
14. Todorov E, (2004) Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nat Neurosci 7: 907-915.
15. Todorov E, (2005) Stochastic optimal control and estimation methods adapted to the noise characteristics of the sensorimotor system. Neural Comput 17: 1084-1108.
16. Diedrichsen J, Shadmehr R, Ivry RB, (2010) The coordination of movement: optimal feedback control and beyond. Trends Cogn Sci 14: 31-39.
17. Diedrichsen J, (2007) Optimal task-dependent changes of bimanual feedback control and adaptation. Curr Biol 17: 1675-1679.
18. Diedrichsen J, Dowling N, (2009) Bimanual coordination as task-dependent linear control policies. Hum Movement Sci 28: 334-347.
19. Izawa J, Rane T, Donchin O, Shadmehr R, (2008) Motor adaptation as a process of reoptimization. J Neurosci 28: 2883-2891.
20. Chen-Harris H, Joiner WM, Ethier V, Zee DS, Shadmehr R, (2008) Adaptive control of saccades via internal feedback. J Neurosci 28: 2804-2813.
21. Braun DA, Aertsen A, Wolpert DM, Mehring C, (2009) Learning optimal adaptation strategies in unpredictable motor tasks. J Neurosci 29: 6472-8.
22. Nagengast AJ, Braun DA, Wolpert DM, (2009) Optimal control predicts human performance on objects with internal degrees of freedom. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000419.
23. Hansen L, Sargent T (2008) Robustness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24. Whittle P, (1981) Risk-sensitive linear/quadratic/Gaussian control. Adv Appl Probab 13: 764-777.
25. Whittle P (1990) Risk-sensitive optimal control. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
26. Ramezani V, Marcus S, (2005) Risk-sensitive probability for Markov chains. Syst Control Lett 54: 493-502.
27. Thrun S, Langford J, Verma V (2002) Risk sensitive particle filters. In: Advances in neural information processing systems 14. Boston: MIT Press.
28. Nagengast AJ, Braun DA, Wolpert DM, (2010) Risk-sensitive optimal feedback control accounts for sensorimotor behavior under uncertainty. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000857.
29. Braun DA, Nagengast AJ, Wolpert DM, (2011) Risk-sensitivity in sensorimotor control. Front Hum Neurosci 5: 00001.
30. Nagengast AJ, Braun DA, Wolpert DM, (2011) Risk sensitivity in a motor task with speed-accuracy trade-off. J Neurophysiol 105: 2668-2674.
31. Nagengast AJ, Braun DA, Wolpert DM, (2011) Risk-sensitivity and the mean-variance trade-off: decision making in sensorimotor control. Proc Biol Sci 278: 2325-2332.
32. Start KB, (1963) Overestimation of personal abilities and success at first-year university examinations. J Soc Psychol 59: 337-345.
33. Kruger J, (1999) Lake wobegon be gone! the "below-average effect" and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. J Pers Soc Psychol 77: 221-232.
34. Gregersen NP, (1996) Young drivers' overestimation of their own skill-an experiment on the relation between training strategy and skill. Accident Anal Prev 28: 243-250.
35. Kruger J, Dunning D, (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol 77: 1121-1134.
36. Harris AJL, Hahn U, (2011) Unrealistic optimism about future life events: A cautionary note. Psychol Rev 118: 135-154.
37. Howard IS, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM, (2009) A modular planar robotic manipulandum with endpoint torque control. J Neurosci Meth 181: 199-211.