Solitary intraductal papillomas of the breast: MRI features and differentiation from small invasive ductal carcinomas

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 199, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 936-942

  Zhu, Ying ^a   Zhang, Shuping ^a   Liu, Peifang ^a   Lu, Hong ^a   Xu, Yilin ^a   Yang, Wei T ^b  

^a TIANJIN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasm; Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI); Invasive ductal carcinoma; MRI; Papilloma

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST PAPILLOMA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOLITARY BREAST PAPILLOMA; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PAPILLOMA, INTRADUCTAL;

EID: 84866850518     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.8507     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Tavassoli FA, Devilee P. World Health Organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs. Lyon, France: IARC Press, 2003:76-78
2. Brookes MJ, Bourke AG. Radiological appearances of papillary breast lesions. Clin Radiol 2008; 63:1265-1273
3. Lam WW, Chu WC, Tang AP, Tse G, Ma TK. Role of radiologic features in the management of papillary lesions of the breast. AJR 2006; 186:1322-1327 (Pubitemid 46112568)
4. Francis A, England D, Rowlands D, Bradley S. Breast papilloma: mammogram, ultrasound and MRI appearances. Breast 2002; 11:394-397 (Pubitemid 35469496)
5. Han BK, Choe YH, Ko YH. Benign papillary lesions of the breast: sonographic-pathologic correlation. J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18:217-223 (Pubitemid 29104460)
6. Ganesan S, Karthik G, Joshi M, Damodaran V. Ultrasound spectrum in intraductal papillary neoplasms of breast. Br J Radiol 2006; 79:843-849 (Pubitemid 44613686)
7. Rovno HD, Siegelman ES, Reynolds C, Orel SG, Schnall MD. Solitary intraductal papilloma: findings at MR imaging and MR galactography. AJR 1999; 172:151-155 (Pubitemid 29028448)
8. Krämer SC, Rieber A, Görich J, et al. Diagnosis of papillomas of the breast: value of magnetic resonance mammography in comparison with galactography. Eur Radiol 2000; 10:1733-1736
9. Daniel BL, Gardner RW, Birdwell RL, Nowels KW, Johnson D. Magnetic resonance imaging of intraductal papilloma of the breast. Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 21:887-892 (Pubitemid 37377482)
10. Kurz KD, Roy S, Saleh A, Diallo-Danebrook R, Skaane P. MRI features of intraductal papilloma of the breast: sheep in wolf's clothing? Acta Radiol 2011; 52:264-272
11. Tominaga J, Hama H, Kimura N, Takahashi S. Magnetic resonance imaging of intraductal papillomas of the breast. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011; 35:153-157
12. Iglesias A, Arias M, Santiago P, Rodríguez M, Mañas J, Saborido C. Benign breast lesions that simulate malignancy: magnetic resonance imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2007; 36:66-82
13. Wang LC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, Peacock S, Lehman CD. MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions: predictive values of kinetic features measured by computer-aided evaluation. AJR 2009; 193:826-831
14. Lee KA, Zuley ML, Chivukula M, Choksi ND, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH. Risk of malignancy when microscopic radial scars and microscopic papillomas are found at percutaneous biopsy. AJR 2012; 198:[web]W141-W145
15. Linda A, Zuiani C, Furlan A, et al. Nonsurgical management of high-risk lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: can malignancy be ruled out safely with breast MRI? AJR 2012; 198:272-280
16. Heller SL, Moy L. Imaging features and management of high-risk lesions on contrast-enhanced dynamic breast MRI. AJR 2012; 198:249-255
17. Giess CS, Raza S, Birdwell RL. Distinguishing breast skin lesions from superficial breast parenchymal lesions: diagnostic criteria, imaging characteristics, and pitfalls. RadioGraphics 2011; 31:1959-1972
18. Kuhl CK, Mielacareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999; 211:101- 110
19. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kuhl CK, et al. BI-RADS: magnetic resonance imaging. In: American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system: (BI- RADS), 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003:17-95
20. Baltzer PA, Kaiser CG, Dietzel M, et al. Value of ductal obstruction sign in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions at MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75:e18-e21
21. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16:172-178 (Pubitemid 34810055)
22. Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M, Cilotti A, Moretti M, Bartolozzi C. Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. Eur Radiol 2007; 17:2646-2655
23. Rosen PP. Benign papillary tumors. In: Rosen PP, ed. Rosen's breast pathology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:67-104