MRI features of intraductal papilloma of the breast: Sheep in wolf's clothingǧ

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 264-272

  Kurz, Kathinka D ^a   Roy, Sumit ^a   Saleh, Andreas ^b   Diallo Danebrock, Raihana ^b   Skaane, Per ^c  

^a STAVANGER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL DÜSSELDORF   (Germany)

^c ULLEVÅL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Breast; Differential diagnostic; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mammography; Neoplasms; Papilloma

Indexed keywords

BREAST; BREAST MRI; CONTRAST-ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOLS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSTIC; INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT; KAPPA COEFFICIENT; MICROCALCIFICATIONS; MR IMAGES; NEOPLASMS; ON DYNAMICS; PAPILLOMA; STRONG ENHANCEMENT; SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS; TIME-INTENSITY CURVES;

BIOPSY; FLOWCHARTING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL IMAGING; TUMORS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST PAPILLOMA; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MASTECTOMY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; PAPILLOMA, INTRADUCTAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 79960963434     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/ar.2011.100434     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Lam WW, Chu WC, Tang AP, et al. Role of radiologic features in the management of papillary lesions of the breast. Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:1322-7 (Pubitemid 46112568)
2. Ashkenazi I, Ferrer K, Sekosan M, et al. Papillary lesions of the breast discovered on percutaneous large core and vacuum-assisted biopsies: Reliability of clinical and pathological parameters in identifying benign lesions. Am J Surg 2007;194:183-8 (Pubitemid 47001890)
3. Puglisi F, Zuiani C, Bazzocchi M, et al. Role of mammography, ultrasound and large core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of papillary breast lesions. Oncology 2003;65:311-5 (Pubitemid 38064942)
4. Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL. Pathology of benign breast disorders. In: Harris JR, Lippmann ME, Morrow M, et al., eds. Diseases of the Breast. 3rd edn. Philadeliphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2004
5. Son EJ, Kim EK, Kim JA, et al. Diagnostic value of 3D fast low-angle shot dynamic MRI of breast papillomas. Yonsei Med J 2009;50:838-44
6. Cardenosa G, Eklund GW. Benign papillary neoplasms of the breast: Mammographic findings. Radiology 1991;181:751-5
7. Rovno HD, Siegelman ES, Reynolds C, et al. Solitary intraductal papilloma: Findings at MR imaging and MR galactography. Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:151-5 (Pubitemid 29028448)
8. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, et al. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994;190:485-93 (Pubitemid 24044258)
9. Daniel BL, Gardner RW, Birdwell RL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of intraductal papilloma of the breast. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21:887-92 (Pubitemid 37377482)
10. Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Fukuda K. Positive and negative predictive values of BI-RADS-MRI descriptors for focal breast masses. Magn Reson Med Sci 2006;5:7-15
11. Kramer SC, Rieber A, Gorich J, et al. Diagnosis of papillomas of the breast: Value of magnetic resonance mammography in comparison with galactography. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1733-6
12. Kurz KD, Roy S, Modder U, et al. Typical atypical findings on dynamic MRI of the breast. Eur J Radiol 2010;76:195-210
13. Sydnor MK, Wilson JD, Hijaz TA, et al. Underestimation of the presence of breast carcinoma in papillary lesions initially diagnosed at core-needle biopsy. Radiology 2007;242:58-62 (Pubitemid 44956008)
14. Liberman L, Tornos C, Huzjan R, et al. Is surgical excision warranted after benign, concordant diagnosis of papilloma at percutaneous breast biopsy? Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:1328-34 (Pubitemid 46112569)
15. Saleh A,Wittsack H, Cohnen M, et al. Accelerated and improved analysis of dynamic breast MRI: Parameter image versus subtraction image guided ROI selection. Eur Radiol 2003;13 (Suppl. 1):399
16. Kurz KD, Wittsack HJ, Willers R, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: Is parametric mapping superior to image subtraction in lesion detection? Eur Radiol 2007;17:3093-9 (Pubitemid 350142334)
17. American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADSw - Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas. Reston, VA: ACR, 2003
18. Orel SG, Kay N, Reynolds C, et al. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology 1999;211:845-50 (Pubitemid 29249488)
19. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: Are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999;211:101-10 (Pubitemid 29161739)
20. Fischer U. Diagnostic criteria. In: Fischer U, ed. Practical MR Mammography. Stuttgart: Thieme, 1999
21. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: Effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 1999;213:881-8
22. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: Diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:35-43 (Pubitemid 30415534)
23. Kramer MS, Feinstein AR. Clinical biostatistics. LIV. The biostatistics of concordance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981;29:111-23 (Pubitemid 11156058)
24. Brennan P, Silman A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ 1992;304:1491-4
25. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Coady AM, et al. Observer variability in the interpretation of contrast enhanced MRI of the breast. Br J Radiol 1996;69:1009-16 (Pubitemid 26388605)
26. Francis A, England D, Rowlands D, et al. Breast papilloma: Mammogram, ultrasound and MRI appearances. Breast 2002;11:394-7 (Pubitemid 35469496)
27. Bhattarai N, Kanemaki Y, Kurihara Y, et al. Intraductal papilloma: Features on MR ductography using a microscopic coil. Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:44-7 (Pubitemid 46100358)
28. Hirose M, Otsuki N, Hayano D, et al. Multi-volume fusion imaging of MR ductography and MR mammography for patients with nipple discharge. Magn Reson Med Sci 2006;5:105-12
29. Greif F, Sharon E, Shechtman I, et al. Carcinoma within solitary ductal papilloma of the breast. Eur J Surg Oncol 2010;36:384-6
30. Lininger RA, Tavassoli FA. Atypical intraductal hyperplasia of the breast. In: Silverstein MJ, ed. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1997
31. Kuhl CK, Schild HH, Morakkabati N. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: Trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology 2005;236:789-800 (Pubitemid 41170839)
32. Rosen EL, Bentley RC, Baker JA, et al. Imaging-guided core needle biopsy of papillary lesions of the breast. Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1185-92 (Pubitemid 35204371)
33. Szabo BK, Aspelin P, Wiberg MK, et al. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast. Analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria. Acta Radiol 2003;44:379-86
34. Ikeda O, Yamashita Y, Morishita S, et al. Characterization of breast masses by dynamic enhanced MR imaging. A logistic regression analysis. Acta Radiol 1999;40:585-92 (Pubitemid 129567274)
35. Kim SJ, Morris EA, Liberman L, et al. Observer variability and applicability of BI-RADS terminology for breast MR imaging: Invasive carcinomas as focal masses. Am J Roentgenol 2001;177: 551-7 (Pubitemid 32802337)
36. Warren RM, Pointon L, Thompson D, et al. Reading protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast: Sensitivity and specificity analysis. Radiology 2005;236:779-88 (Pubitemid 41170838)
37. Warren R, Hayes C, Pointon L, et al. A test of performance of breast MRI interpretation in a multicentre screening study. Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:917-29 (Pubitemid 44205382)
38. Fischer DR, Wurdinger S, Boettcher J, et al. Further signs in the evaluation of magnetic resonance mammography: A retrospective study. Invest Radiol 2005;40:430-5 (Pubitemid 40863786)
39. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG. Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology 2001;219:484-94 (Pubitemid 32336366)
40. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: Multicenter study. Radiology 2006;238:42-53 (Pubitemid 43010579)