Gender-based rejection sensitivity and academic self-silencing in women

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 102, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 961-979

  London, Bonita ^a   Downey, Geraldine ^b   Romero Canyas, Rainer ^b   Rattan, Aneeta ^c   Tyson, Diana ^d  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES   (United States)

Author keywords

Discrimination; Rejection sensitivity; Self silencing; Women

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PERCEPTION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELF CONCEPT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL DISTANCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STUDENT; UNITED STATES;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; ANXIETY; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PREJUDICE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELF CONCEPT; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL DISTANCE; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; STEREOTYPING; STUDENTS; UNITED STATES; WOMEN;

EID: 84866790335     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0026615     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Amanatullah, E. T., & Morris, M. W. (2010). Negotiating gender roles: Sex differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women's fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 256-267. doi:10.1037/a0017094
2. American Bar Association. (2011). Commission on women in the profession: A current glance at women in the law 2011. Retrieved from http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/uncategorized/2011/cwp_current_glance_statistics_2011.authcheckdam.pdf
3. Aronson, J., Quinn, D. M., & Spencer, S. J. (1998). Stereotype threat and the academic performance of women and minorities. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective (pp. 83-103). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4. Ayduk, O., May, D., Downey, G., & Higgins, T. (2003). Tactical differences in coping with rejection sensitivity: The role of prevention pride. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 435-448. doi:10.1177/0146167202250911
5. Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561-571. Retrieved from http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/
6. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
7. Brown, R. P., & Pinel, E. C. (2003). Stigma on my mind: Individual differences in the experience of stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 626-633. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00039-8
8. Chan, W., & Mendoza-Denton, R. (2008). Status-based rejection sensitivity among Asian Americans: Implications for psychological distress. Journal of Personality, 76, 1317-1346. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00522.x
9. Cohen, G. L., Steele, C. M., & Ross, L. D. (1999). The mentor's dilemma: Providing critical feedback across the racial divide. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1302-1318. doi:10.1177/0146167299258011
10. Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.608
11. Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218-228. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.218
12. Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371-386. doi:10.1177/000276484027003008
13. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615-1628. doi:10.1177/014616702237644
14. Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991-1004. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.991
15. Dittes, J. E., & Harold, H. K. (1956). Effects of different conditions of acceptance upon conformity to group norms. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 100-107. doi:10.1037/h0047855
16. Downey, G., & Feldman, S. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327-1343. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327
17. Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
18. Eagly, A. H., & Chrvala, C. (1986). Sex differences in conformity: Status and gender role interpretations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10, 203-220. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1986.tb00747.x
19. Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90-101. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90
20. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
21. Foley, S., & Kidder, D. L. (2002). Hispanic law students' perceptions of discrimination, justice, and career prospects. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 24, 23-37. doi:10.1177/0739986302024001002
22. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complimentary justifications of gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
23. Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Women's achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 17-28. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004
24. Guinier, L., Fine, M., & Balin, J. (1997). Becoming gentleman: Women, law school, and institutional change. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
25. Heilman, M. E., & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Gender stereotypes are alive, well, and busy producing workplace discrimination, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 393-398. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00072.x
26. Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81-92. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81
27. Horney, K. (1937). The neurotic personality of our time. New York, NY: Norton.
28. Jack, D. C., & Dill, D. (1992). The Silencing the Self Scale: Schemas of intimacy associated with depression in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 97-106. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00242.x
29. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
30. Keller, J., & Molix, L. (2008). When women can't do math: The interplay of self-construal, group identification, and stereotypic performance standards. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 437-444. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.007
31. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 4th ed., pp. 233-265). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
32. Krakauer, L., & Chen, C. P. (2003). Gender barriers in the legal profession: Implications for career development of female law students. Journal of Employment Counseling, 40, 65-79. Retrieved from http://www.counseling.org/Publications/Journals.aspx
33. Kray, L. J., Thompson, L., & Galinsky, A. (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 942-958. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.942
34. Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
35. Leonard, M. M., & Ossana, S. (1987). Technical manual for the Campus Environment Survey. Unpublished manual, University of Maryland Counseling Center, College Park.
36. Logel, C., Walton, G. M., Spencer, S. J., Iserman, E. C., von Hippel, W., & Bell, A. (2009). Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1089-1103. doi:10.1037/a0015703
37. London, B., & Downey, G. (2006). What's a woman to do? Expectations of gender based rejection and the academic engagement of women. Barriers to achievement: The role of identity and belonging in the classroom. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues Long Beach CA.
38. London, B., Downey, G., Bolger, N., & Velilla, E. (2005). A framework for studying social identity and coping with daily stress during the transition to college. In G. Downey, J. Eccles, & C. Chatman (Eds.), Navigating the future: Social identity, coping, and life tasks (pp. 45-64). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
39. London, B., Downey, G., Bonica, C., & Paltin, I. (2007). Social causes and consequences of rejection sensitivity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 481-506. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00531.x
40. London, B., Downey, G., & Mace, S. (2007). Psychological theories of educational engagement: A multimethod approach to studying individual engagement and institutional change. Vanderbilt Law Review, 60, 455-481.
41. London, B., & Rosenthal, L. (in press). The social stigma of identity and status based rejection. In C. Nathan Dewall (Ed.), The handbook of social exclusion. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
42. Madera, J. M., Hebl, M. R., & Martin, R. C. (2009). Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1591-1599. doi:10.1037/a0016539
43. Major, B., & O'Brien, L. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393-421. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137
44. Mendoza-Denton, R., Downey, G., Purdie, V., Davis, A., & Pietrzak, J. (2002). Sensitivity to status-based rejection: Implications for African-American students' college experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 896-918. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.896
45. Mendoza-Denton, R., Shaw-Taylor, L., Chen, S., & Chang, E. (2009). Ironic effects of explicit gender prejudice on women's test performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 275-278. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.017
46. Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672-682. doi:10.2307/2084686
47. Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure (Rev. ed.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
48. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
49. Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Rudman, L. A. (2010). Disruptions in women's self-promotion: The backlash avoidance model. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 186-202. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01561.x
50. Pachankis, J. E., Goldfried, M. R., & Ramrattan, M. (2008). Extension of the rejection sensitivity construct to the interpersonal functioning of gay men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 306-317. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.306
51. Pinel, E. C. (1999). Stigma consciousness: The psychological legacy of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 114-128. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.114
52. Purdie-Vaughns, V., Steele, C. M., Davies, P., Ditlmann, R., & Crosby, J. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African-Americans in mainstream settings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 615-630. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615
53. Rabinowitz, V. C., & Martin, D. (2001). Choices and consequences: Methodological issues in the study of gender. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 29-52). New York, NY: Wiley.
54. Romero-Canyas, R., & Downey, G. (2011). What I see when I think it's about me: People low in rejection-sensitivity downplay cues of rejection in self-relevant situations. Manuscript submitted for publication.
55. Romero-Canyas, R., Downey, G., Berenson, K., Ayduk, O., & Kang, N. J. (2010). Rejection sensitivity and the rejection-hostility link in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality, 78, 119-148. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00611.x
56. Romero-Canyas, R., Downey, G., Reddy, K. S., Rodriguez, S., Cavanaugh, T., & Pelayo, R. (2010). Paying to belong: When does rejection trigger ingratiation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 802-823. doi:10.1037/a0020013
57. Romero-Canyas, R., Reddy, K. S., Rodriguez, S., & Downey, G. (2011). After all I've done for you: Relational accommodation fuels postrejection hostility. Manuscript submitted for publication.
58. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York, NY: Basic Books.
59. Ruble, D. N., & Seidman, E. (1996). Social transitions: Windows into social psychological processes. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Handbook of social processes (pp. 830-856). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
60. Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157-176. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157
61. Saltzstein, H. D. (1975). Effect of rejection and acceptance from a group on conformity to two types of social influence. Psychological Reports, 37, 839-848. doi:10.2466/pr0.1975.37.3.839
62. Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection and communication. The Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 46, 190-207. doi:10.1037/h0062326
63. Schachter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
64. Schmader, T. (2002). Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 194-201. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1500
65. Sherman, P., & Spence, J. T. (1997). A comparison of two cohorts of college students in responses to the Male-Female Relations Questionnaire. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 265-278. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00112.x
66. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80-83. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00111
67. Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 323-355. doi:10.3102/10769986023004323
68. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Sawin, L. (1980). The Male-Female Relations Questionnaire: A self-report inventory of sex role behaviors and preferences and their relationship to masculine and feminine personality traits, sex role attitudes, and other measures. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 87-88.
69. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity [Abstract]. Journal Supplement Abstract Service Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 43-44.
70. Steinpreis, R. E., Anders, K. A., & Ritzke, D. (1999). The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles, 41, 509-528. doi:10.1023/A:1018839203698
71. Stewart, A. J., & Dottolo, A. L. (2005). Socialization to the academy: Coping with competing social identities. In G. Downey, J. S. Eccles, & C. M. Chatman (Eds.), Navigating the future: Social identity, coping, and life tasks (pp. 167-187). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
72. Sturm, S. (1999). Rethinking race, gender, and the law in the twenty-first century workplace. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 12, 20-51. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.1999.tb00113.x
73. Trix, F., & Psenka, C. (2003). Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse & Society, 14, 191-220. doi:10.1177/0957926503014002277
74. Valian, V. (2007). Women in science-And elsewhere. In S. J. Ceci & W. Williams (Eds.), Why aren't more women in science? Top gender researchers debate the evidence (pp. 27-37). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11546-002
75. van den Bos, K., Brockner, J., Stein, J. H., Steiner, D. D., Van Yperen, N. W., & Dekker, D. M. (2010). The psychology of voice and performance capabilities in masculine and feminine cultures and contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 638-648.
76. Vescio, T. K., Gervais, S., Snyder, M., & Hoover, A. (2005). Power and the creation of patronizing environments: The stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 658-672. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.658
77. Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 82-96. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82
78. Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969). Measurement of social evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 448-457. doi:10.1037/h0027806
79. Wennerås, C., & Wold, A. (1997, May 22). Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature, 387, 341-343. doi:10.1038/387341a0
80. Zirkel, S. (2008). Creating more effective multiethnic schools. Social Issues and Policy Review, 2, 187-241.