The influence of parents and teachers on the deep learning approach of pupils in Norwegian upper-secondary schools

Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 35-56

  Elstad, Eyvind ^a   Christophersen, Knut Andreas ^a   Turmo, Are ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Deep learning approach; Norway; Parental influence; Teacher pressure; Youth

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866773138     PISSN: 16995880     EISSN: 16962095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Baar, B. (1986). The cognitive revolution in psychology. New York: Guilford.
3. Bath, D. M., & Smith, C. D. (2009). The relationship between epistemological beliefs and the propensity for lifelong learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 31, 173-189.
4. Biggs, J. (1987). The Learning Process Questionnaire (LPQ): Manual. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
5. Biggs, J. (1991). Approaches to learning in secondary and tertiary students in Hong Kong: Some comparative studies. Educational Research Journal, 21, 46-58.
6. Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.
7. Bjørgen, I. A. (1994). Ansvar for egen læring. Trondheim: Tapir Forlag.
8. BLD (1981). Lov om barn og foreldre. Oslo: Barne- likestillings- og inkluderingsdepartementet.
9. Blunch, N. J. (2008). Introduction to structural equation modelling using SPSS and AMOS. London: Sage.
10. Bruner, J. (1983). In search of mind. New York: Harper & Row.
11. Cano, F., & Cardelle-Elawar, M. (2008). Family environment, epistemological beliefs, learning strategies, and academic performance: A path analysis. In K. M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures. (pp. 219-239), New York: Springer.
12. Corno, L. (2000). Special double issue on conceptions of volition: Theoretical investigation and studies of practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 659-663.
13. Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
14. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1996). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
15. Diseth, Å., & Martinsen, Ø. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23, 195-207.
16. Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939-944.
17. Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40, 117-128.
18. Eklund-Myrskog, G., & Wenestam, C. G. (1999). Student approaches to learning in Finnish general upper-secondary school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43, 5-18.
19. Elstad, E. (2006). Understanding the nature of accountability failures in the technology-filled classroom: Disaffected students and teachers who give in. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38, 459-481.
20. Elstad, E. (2008). Towards a theory of mutual dependency between school administrators and teachers. Bargaining theory as research heuristic. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 36, 383-404.
21. Elster, J. (1979). Ulysses and the sirens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Elster, J. (2000). Ulysses unbound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Styles of learning and teaching: An integrative outline of educational psychology. Chichester: Wiley.
24. Gardner, H. (1985). The mind's new science. A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.
25. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493-503.
26. Groves, M. (2005). Problem-based learning approach: Is there a relationship? Advances in Health Science Education, 10, 353-405.
27. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
28. Jones, A. & Jones, D. (1996). Student orientation to independent learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 15, 83-96.
29. KD (2008) The Teacher: The role and education. White Paper no. 11. Oslo: Ministry of Education.
30. Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1994). Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 58-74.
31. Klette, K. (2007). Bruk av arbeidsplaner i skolen - et hovedverktøy for å realisere tilpasset opplæring? Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift, 91, 344-358
32. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principle and practice of structural equation modelling. New York: Guilford.
33. Krumsvik, R. (2006). ICT in the school. ICT-initiated school development in lower secondary school. Bergen: University of Bergen.
34. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1999). Social support and achievement for young adolescents in Chicago: The role of school academic press. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 907-945.
35. Leung, M. Y., Lu, X., Chen, D., & Lu, T. (2008). Impacts of teaching approaches on learning approaches of construction engineering students: A comparative study between Hong Kong and mainland China. Journal of Engineering Education, 4, 135-145.
36. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning. I. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
37. Nielsen, H. B. (2009). Skoletid. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
38. NOU. (2003). I første rekke, hovedinnstilling. Oslo: Ministry of Education.
39. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Phan, H. P. (2008). Predicting change in epistemological beliefs, reflecting thinking and learning styles: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 75-93.
41. Phan, H. P. (2009). Amalgamation of future time orientation, epistemological beliefs, achievement goals and study strategies: Empirical evidence established. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 155-173.
42. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Hong Kong: Open University Press.
43. Provost, S. C., & Bond, N. W. (1997). Approaches to studying and academic performance in a traditional psychology course. Higher Educational Research and Development, 16, 309-320.
44. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
45. Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
46. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasiexperimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
47. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
48. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekarts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-discipline (pp. 450-502), San Diego: Academic Press.
49. Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
50. Thompson, R. F. (1994). Behaviorism and neuroscience. Psychological Review, 101, 259- 265.
51. UFD (2004). Press Release. May 14, 2004. Oslo: Ministry of Educarion and Research.
52. Weinstein, C., & Mayer, R. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan.
53. Wolters, C. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of selfregulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189-205.
54. Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). New York: Sage.
55. Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic discipline: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning. From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1-19), New York: Guilford.