A new mirror-based extrinsic camera calibration using an orthogonality constraint

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1051-1058

  Takahashi, Kosuke ^a   Nobuhara, Shohei ^a   Matsuyama, Takashi ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXTRINSIC CAMERA; EXTRINSIC PARAMETER; LARGE SYSTEM; ORTHOGONALITY CONSTRAINTS; P3P PROBLEM; QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION; REFERENCE OBJECTS; ROBUST SOLUTIONS; STATIONARY CAMERAS; TWO-POINT;

COMPUTER VISION; MIRRORS;

CAMERAS;

EID: 84866681593     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6247783     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. S. Agarwal, Y. Furukawa, N. Snavely, B. Curless, S. M. Seitz, and R. Szeliski. Reconstructing rome. IEEE Computer, 43:40-47, 2010.
2. R. Azuma, Y. Baillot, R. Behringer, S. Feiner, S. Julier, and B. MacIntyre. Recent advances in augmented reality. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 21(6):34-47, 2001.
3. G. Desouza and A. Kak. Vision for mobile robot navigation: a survey. IEEE TPAMI, 24(2):237-267, 2002.
4. F. Fraundorfer, D. Scaramuzza, and M. Pollefeys. A constricted bundle adjustment parameterization for relative scale estimation in visual odometry. In Proc. of ICRA, pages 1899 -1904, 2010.
5. G. Golub and C. van Loan. Matrix Computations. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, third edition, 1996.
6. B. M. Haralick, C.-N. Lee, K. Ottenberg, and M. Nölle. Review and analysis of solutions of the three point perspective pose estimation problem. IJCV, 13:331-356, 1994.
7. R. I. Hartley and A. Zisserman. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press, second edition, 2004.
8. J. A. Hesch, A. I. Mourikis, and S. I. Roumeliotis. Algorithmic Foundation of Robotics VIII, volume 57 of Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, chapter Mirror-Based Extrinsic Camera Calibration, pages 285-299. 2009.
9. J. A. Hesch, A. I. Mourikis, and S. I. Roumeliotis. Extrinsic camera calibration using multiple reflections. In Proc. of ECCV, 2010.
10. K. H. Jang, D. H. Lee, and S. K. Jung. A moving planar mirror based approach for cultural reconstruction: Research articles. Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds, 15:415-423, 2004.
11. T. Kanade, P. Rander, and P. Narayanan. Virtualized reality: constructing virtual worlds from real scenes. IEEE Multimedia, 4(1):34-47, 1997.
12. R. Kumar, A. Ilie, J.-M. Frahm, and M. Pollefeys. Simple calibration of non-overlapping cameras with a mirror. In Proc. of CVPR, pages 1-7, 2008.
13. P. Lébraly, C. Deymier, O. Ait-Aider, and M. D. E. Royer. Flexible extrinsic calibration of non-overlapping cameras using a planar mirror: Application to vision-based robotics. In Proc. of IROS, pages 5640-5647, 2010.
14. M. Moakher. Means and averaging in the group of rotations. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 24(1):1-16, 2002.
15. S. Nayar. Catadioptric omnidirectional camera. In Proc. of CVPR, pages 482-488, 1997.
16. R. Rodrigues, P. Barreto, and U. Nunes. Camera pose estimation using images of planar mirror reflections. In Proc. of ECCV, pages 382-395, 2010.
17. J. Starck, A. Maki, S. Nobuhara, A. Hilton, and T. Matsuyama. The multiple-camera 3-d production studio. IEEE TCSVT, 19(6):856-869, 2009.
18. P. Sturm and T. Bonfort. How to compute the pose of an object without a direct view. In Proc. of ACCV, pages 21-31, 2006.
19. X. Ying, K. Peng, R. Ren, and H. Zha. Geometric properties of multiple reflections in catadioptric camera with two planar mirrors. In Proc. of CVPR, pages 1126 -1132, 2010.
20. Z. Zhang. A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE TPAMI, pages 1330-1334, 2000.