Does visually induced self-motion affect grip force when holding an object?

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 108, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1685-1694

  Bringoux, Lionel ^a   Lepecq, Jean Claude ^a   Danion, Frédéric ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Grip force; Human; Object manipulation; Vection; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BUILDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GRIP STRENGTH; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMMERSION; INDEX FINGER; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; NORMAL HUMAN; OSCILLATION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SPECTROSCOPY; THUMB; VELOCITY; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARM; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 84866369094     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00407.2012     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Aglioti S, DeSouza JF, Goodale MA. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr Biol 5: 679-685, 1995.
2. Brenner E, Smeets JB. Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Exp Brain Res 111: 473-476, 1996.
3. Bridgeman B, Gemmer A, Forsman T, Huemer V. Processing spatial information in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system. Vision Res 40: 3539-3552, 2000.
4. Bringoux L, Bourdin C, Lepecq JC, Sandor PM, Pergandi JM, Mestre D. Interaction between reference frames during subjective vertical estimates in a tilted immersive virtual environment. Perception 38: 1053-1071, 2009.
5. Brogaard B. Conscious vision for action versus unconscious vision for action? Cogn Sci 35: 1076-1104, 2011.
6. Buckingham G, Goodale MA. Lifting without seeing: the role of vision in perceiving and acting upon the size weight illusion. PLoS One 5: e9709, 2010.
7. Buckingham G, Ranger NS, Goodale MA. The role of vision in detecting and correcting fingertip force errors during object lifting. J Vis 11: 4, 2011.
8. Coello Y, Danckert J, Blangero A, Rossetti Y. Do visual illusions probe the visual brain? Illusions in action without a dorsal visual stream. Neuropsychologia 45: 1849-1858, 2007.
9. Cohn JV, DiZio P, Lackner JR. Reaching during virtual rotation: context specific compensations for expected coriolis forces. J Neurophysiol 83: 3230-3240, 2000.
10. Cole KJ, Abbs JH. Grip force adjustments evoked by load force perturbations of a grasped object. J Neurophysiol 60: 1513-1522, 1988.
11. Cole KJ. Lifting a familiar object: visual size analysis, not memory for object weight, scales lift force. Exp Brain Res 188: 551-557, 2008.
12. Collins DF, Cameron T, Gillard DM, Prochazka A. Muscular sense is attenuated when humans move. J Physiol 508: 635-643, 1998.
13. Cruz-Neira C, Sandin D, DeFanti T. Surround-screen projection-based virtual reality: the design and implementation of the CAVE. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. New York: ACM SIGGRAPH, 1993, p. 135-142.
14. Danion F, Descoins M, Bootsma RJ. When the fingers need to act faster than the arm: coordination between grip force and load force during oscillation of a hand-held object. Exp Brain Res 193: 85-94, 2009.
15. Danion F, Sarlegna FR. Can the human brain predict the consequences of arm movement corrections when transporting an object? Hints from grip force adjustments. J Neurosci 27: 12839-12843, 2007.
16. Danion F. The contribution of non-digital afferent signals to grip force adjustments evoked by brisk unloading of the arm or the held object. Clin Neurophysiol 118: 146-154, 2007.
17. Daprati E, Gentilucci M. Grasping an illusion. Neuropsychologia 35: 1577-1582, 1997.
18. Descoins M, Danion F, Bootsma RJ. Predictive control of grip force when moving object with an elastic load applied on the arm. Exp Brain Res 172: 331-342, 2006.
19. Dvorkin AY, Kenyon RV, Keshner EA. Effects of roll visual motion on online control of arm movement: reaching within a dynamic virtual environment. Exp Brain Res 193: 95-107, 2009.
20. Flanagan J, Johansson R. Sensorimotor control of manipulation. In: Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Oxford, UK: L. Squire, 2009, p. 593-604.
21. Flanagan JR, Beltzner MA. Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size-weight illusion. Nat Neurosci 3: 737-741, 2000.
22. Flanagan JR, Tresilian JR. Grip-load force coupling: a general control strategy for transporting objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20: 944-957, 1994.
23. Flanagan JR, Wing AM. The stability of precision grip forces during cyclic arm movements with a hand-held load. Exp Brain Res 105: 455-464, 1995.
24. Goodale MA, Meenan JP, Bülthoff HH, Nicolle DA, Murphy KJ, Racicot CI. Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Curr Biol 4: 604-610, 1994.
25. Goodale MA, Milner AD, Jakobson LS, Carey DP. A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 349: 154-156, 1991.
26. Guerraz M, Bronstein AM. Mechanisms underlying visually induced body sway. Neurosci Lett 443: 12-16, 2008.
27. Häger-Ross C, Johansson RS. Nondigital afferent input in reactive control of fingertip forces during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 110: 131-141, 1996.
28. Hermsdörfer J, Marquardt C, Philipp J, Zierdt A, Nowak D, Glasauer S, Mai N. Grip forces exerted against stationary held objects during gravity changes. Exp Brain Res 126: 205-214, 1999.
29. Jackson SR, Shaw A. The Ponzo illusion affects grip-force but not gripaperture scaling during prehension movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26: 418-423, 2000.
30. Jenmalm P, Dahlstedt S, Johansson RS. Visual and tactile information about object-curvature control fingertip forces and grasp kinematics in human dexterous manipulation. J Neurophysiol 84: 2984-2997, 2000.
31. Johansson RS, Häger C, Bäckström L. Somatosensory control of precision grip during unpredictable pulling loads. III. Impairments during digital anesthesia. Exp Brain Res 89: 204-213, 1992a.
32. Johansson RS, Häger C, Riso R. Somatosensory control of precision grip during unpredictable pulling loads. II. Changes in load force rate. Exp Brain Res 89: 192-203, 1992b.
33. Johansson RS, Riso R, Häger C, Bäckström L. Somatosensory control of precision grip during unpredictable pulling loads. I. Changes in load force amplitude. Exp Brain Res 89: 181-191, 1992c.
34. Johansson RS, Westling G. Programmed and triggered actions to rapid load changes during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 71: 72-86, 1988.
35. Kawato M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9: 718-727, 1999.
36. Lepecq JC, Giannopulu I, Baudonniere PM. Cognitive effects on visually induced body motion in children. Perception 24: 435-449, 1995.
37. Lepecq JC, Giannopulu I, Mertz S, Baudonnière PM. Vestibular sensitivity and vection chronometry along the spinal axis in erect man. Perception 28: 63-72, 1999.
38. Lestienne F, Soechting J, Berthoz A. Postural readjustments induced by linear motion of visual scenes. Exp Brain Res 28: 363-384, 1977.
39. Lukos JR, Ansuini C, Santello M. Anticipatory control of grasping: independence of sensorimotor memories for kinematics and kinetics. J Neurosci 28: 12765-12774, 2008.
40. Monzée J, Lamarre Y, Smith AM. The effects of digital anesthesia on force control using a precision grip. J Neurophysiol 89: 672-683, 2003.
41. Nowak DA, Glasauer S, Meyer L, Mait N, Hermsdörfer J. The role of cutaneous feedback for anticipatory grip force adjustments during object movements and externally imposed variation of the direction of gravity. Somatosens Mot Res 19: 49-60, 2002.
42. Nowak DA. Different modes of grip force control: voluntary and externally guided arm movements with a hand-held load. Clin Neurophysiol 115: 839-848, 2004.
43. Ohmi M, Howard IP, Landolt JP. Circular vection as a function of foreground-background relationships. Perception 16: 17-22, 1987.
44. Riecke B. Compelling self-motion through virtual environments without actual self-motion: using self-motion illusions ("vection") to improve user experience in VR. In: Virtual Reality, edited by Kim J-J. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, 2011, chapt. 8, p. 149-176.
45. Riecke BE, Schulte-Pelkum J, Avraamides MN, Heyde MV, Bülthoff HH. Cognitive factors can influence self-motion perception (vection) in virtual reality. ACM Trans Appl Percept 3: 194-216, 2006.
46. Sarlegna FR, Baud-Bovy G, Danion F. Delayed visual feedback affects both manual tracking and grip force control when transporting a handheld object. J Neurophysiol 104: 641-653, 2010.
47. Seno T, Ito H, Sunaga S. The object and background hypothesis for vection. Vision Res 49: 2973-2982, 2009.
48. Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci 12: 257-285, 1988.
49. Thilo KV, Gresty MA. Visual motion stimulation, but not visually induced perception of self-motion, biases the perceived direction of verticality. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 14: 258-263, 2002.
50. Thurrell AE, Bronstein AM. Vection increases the magnitude and accuracy of visually evoked postural responses. Exp Brain Res 147: 558-560, 2002.
51. Wei K, Stevenson IH, Körding KP. The uncertainty associated with visual flow fields and their influence on postural sway: Weber's law suffices to explain the nonlinearity of vection. J Vis 10: 4, 2010.
52. Westling G, Johansson RS. Factors influencing the force control during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 53: 277-284, 1984.
53. Wing AM, Flanagan JR, Richardson J. Anticipatory postural adjustments in stance and grip. Exp Brain Res 116: 122-130, 1997.
54. Witney AG, Wing A, Thonnard JL, Smith AM. The cutaneous contribution to adaptive precision grip. Trends Neurosci 27: 637-643, 2004.
55. Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR. Motor prediction. Curr Biol 11: R729-R732, 2001.
56. Wright WG, DiZio P, Lackner JR. Vertical linear self-motion perception during visual and inertial motion: more than weighted summation of sensory inputs. J Vestib Res 15: 185-195, 2005.
57. Wright WG, DiZio P, Lackner JR. Perceived self-motion in two visual contexts: dissociable mechanisms underlie perception. J Vestib Res 16: 23-28, 2006.
58. Wright WG, Glasauer S. Subjective somatosensory vertical during dynamic tilt is dependent on task, inertial condition, and multisensory concordance. Exp Brain Res 172: 310-321, 2006.
59. Wright WG, Schneider E, Glasauer S. Compensatory manual motor responses while object wielding during combined linear visual and physical roll tilt stimulation. Exp Brain Res 192: 683-694, 2009.