Subjective somatosensory vertical during dynamic tilt is dependent on task, inertial condition, and multisensory concordance

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 172, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 310-321

  Wright, W G ^a,b   Glasauer, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Sensorimotor; Spatial orientation; Virtual environment

Indexed keywords

WATER;

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIOR; DARKNESS; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GRAVITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; TASK PERFORMANCE; TILTING; VESTIBULAR STIMULATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ATTENTION; CUES; FEEDBACK; GRAVITY PERCEPTION; GRAVITY SENSING; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MUSCULOSKELETAL EQUILIBRIUM; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; POSTURAL BALANCE; PROPRIOCEPTION; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TILT-TABLE TEST; TOUCH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VESTIBULE; VESTIBULE, LABYRINTH;

EID: 33745014101     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0347-4     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Angelaki DE, McHenry MQ, Dickman JD, Newlands SD, Hess BJM (1999) Computation of inertial motion: Neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information. J Neuroscience 19:316-327
2. Bisdorff A, Bronstein AM, Gresty M, Wolsley C (1996) Subjective postural vertical inferred from vestibular-optokinetic vs. proprioceptive cues. Brain Res Bull 40:413-415
3. Bock O (1997) Effects of a tilted visual background on human sensory-motor coordination. Exp Brain Res 115:507-512
4. Curthoys IS (1996) The delay of the oculogravic illusion. Brain Res Bull 40:407-410
5. de Graaf B, Bles W, Bos JE (1998) Roll motion stimuli: Sensory conflict, perceptual weighting and motion sickness. Brain Res Bull 47:489-495
6. Darling WG, Hondzinski JM (1999) Kinesthetic perceptions of earth- and body-fixed axes. Exp Brain Res 126:417-430
7. Dichgans J, Held R, Young LR, Brandt T (1972) Moving visual scenes influence the apparent direction of gravity. Science 178:1217-1219
8. Gentaz E, Luyat M, Cian C, Hatwell Y, Barraud PA, Raphel C (2001) The reproduction of vertical and oblique orientations in the visual, haptic, and somato-vestibular systems. QJEP 54A(2):513-526
9. Glasauer S (1995) Linear acceleration perception: frequency dependence of the hilltop illusion. Acta Otolaryngol 520(Suppl):37-40
10. Glasauer S, Merfeld DM (1997) Modeling three dimensional vestibular responses during complex motion stimulation. In: Fetter M, Haslwanter T, Misslisch H, Tweed D (eds) Three-Dimensional Kinematic Principles of Eye-, Head , and Limb Movements in Health and Disease. Harwood Amsterdam, pp 387-398
11. Glasauer S, Schneider E, Jahn K, Strupp M, Brandt T (2005) How the eyes move the body. Neurology, doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000175132.01370.fc
12. Graybiel A, Brown R (1951) The delay in visual reorientation following exposure to a change in direction of resultant force on a human centrifuge. J Gen Psych 45:143-150
13. Groen EL, Jenkin HL, Howard IP (2002) Perception of self-tilt in a true and illusory vertical plane. Perception 31:1477-1490
14. Guedry FE (1974) Psychophysics of vestibular sensation. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, vol. 6, Part II, pp 3-154
15. Howard IP (1982) Human visual orientation. Wiley, New York
16. Howard IP, Childerson L (1994) The contributions of motion, the visual frame, and visual polarity to sensations of body tilt. Perception 23:753-762
17. Jaggi-Schwarz K, Hess BM (2003) Influence of dynamic tilts on the perception of earth-vertical. Exp Brain Res 149:340-350
18. Keshner EA, Kenyon RV (2000) The influence of immersive virtual environment on the segmental organization. J Vest Res 10:207-219
19. Lackner JR, Graybiel A (1979) Parabolic flight: loss of sense of orientation. Science 206:1105-1108
20. Lackner JR, Graybiel A (1983) Perceived orientation in free fall depends on visual, postural, and architectural factors. Aviat Space Environ Med 54:47-51
21. Lee DN, Lishman JR (1975) Visual proprioceptive control of stance. J Hum Movement Stud 1:87-95
22. Mast FW (2000) Does the world rock when the eyes roll? Allocentric orientation representation, ocular counterroll, and the subject visual vertical. Swiss J Psych 59:89-101
23. Merfeld DM, Zupan LH, Gifford CA (2001). Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. II. Influence of the semicircular canals during eccentric rotation. J Neurophysiol 85:1648-1660
24. Mergner T (2002) The Matryoshka Dolls principle in human dynamic behavior in space: a theory of linked references for multisensory perception and control of action. Curr Psychol Cognition 21:129-212
25. Mittelstaedt H (1986) The subjective vertical as a function of visual and extraretinal cues. Acta Psychologica 63:63-85
26. Mittelstaedt H (1988) The information processing structure of the subjective vertical. In: Marko H, Hauske G, Struppler A (eds) Processing structures for perception and action. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim, pp 217-263
27. Mittelstaedt H, Fricke E (1988) The relative effect of saccular and somatosensory information on spatial perception and control. Adv Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 42:24-30
28. Nashner LM (1982) Adaptation of human movement to altered environments. Trends Neurosci 5:358-361
29. Ohmi M (1996) Egocentric perception through interaction among many sensory systems. Cognitive Brain Res 5:87-96
30. Peterka RJ (2002) Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J Neurophysiol 88:1097-1118
31. Schmid-Priscoveanu A, Straumann D, Kori AA (2000) Torsional VOR during whole-body oscillation in the upright and the supine position. Exp Brain Res 134:212-219
32. Thilo KV, Gresty MA (2002). Visual motion stimulation, but not visually induced perception of self-motion, biases the perceived direction of verticality. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 14:258-263
33. Van Beuzekom AD, Van Gisbergen JAM (2000) Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates. J Neurophysiol 84:11-27
34. Wade SW, Curthoys IS (1997) The effect of ocular torsional position on perception of the roll-tilt of visual stimuli. Vision Res 37:1071-1078
35. Wertheim AH, Mesland BS, Bles W (2001) Cognitive suppression of tilt sensations during linear horizontal self-motion in the dark. Perception 30:733-741
36. Wright WG, Glasauer S (2003) Haptic subjective vertical shows context dependence: Task and vision play a role during dynamic tilt stimulation. Ann NY Aca Sci 1004:531-535
37. Zacharias GL, Young LR (1981) Influence of combined visual and vestibular cues on human perception and control of rotation. Exp Brain Res 41:159-171
38. Zupan LH, Merfeld DM (2003) Neural processing of gravitoinertial cues in humans. IV. Influence of visual rotational cues during roll optokinetic stimuli. J Neurophysiol 89:390-400
39. Zupan LH, Merfeld DM, Darlot C (2002) Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements. Biol Cybern 86:209-230