Reaching during virtual rotation: Context specific compensations for expected coriolis forces

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 83, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 3230-3240

  Cohn, Joseph V ^a   Dizio, Paul ^a   Lackner, James R ^a  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; CORIOLIS PHENOMENON; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; VELOCITY;

EID: 0034047403     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.6.3230     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. BIZZI E, HOGAN N, MUSSA-IVALDI FA, AND GISZTER S. Does the nervous system use equilibrium point control to guide single and multiple joint movements? Behav Brain Sci 15: 603-613, 1992.
2. BORTOLAMI SB, PIGEON P, LACKNER JR, AND DIZIO P. Self-generated Coriolis forces on the arm during natural turning and reaching movements. Soc Neurosci Abstr 25: 1912, 1999.
3. BRASHERS-KRUG T, SHADMEHR R, AND BIZZI E. Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 382: 252-255, 1996.
4. COHEN MM. Sensory-motor adaptation and after-effects of exposure to increased gravitational forces. Aerospace Med 41: 318-322, 1970.
5. COHN JV, DIZIO P, AND LACKNER JR. Reaching movements during illusory self-rotation show compensation for expected Coriolis forces. Soc Neurosci Abstr 22: 426, 1996.
6. DICHGANS J AND BRANDT TH. The psychophysics of visually induced perception of self-motion and tilt. In: The Neurosciences, edited by Schmidt FO and Worden FG. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1974, vol. 3, p. 123-129.
7. DIZIO P AND LACKNER JR. Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the non-exposed arm. J Neurophysiol 74: 1787-1792, 1995.
8. DUNCKER K. Induced motion. In: A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology, edited by Ellis WD. New York: Humanities, 1938, p. 161-172.
9. FELDMAN AG. Once more for the equilibrium point hypothesis (λ model). J Mot Behav 18: 17-54, 1986.
10. FISK J, LACKNER JR, AND DIZIO P. Gravitoinertial force level influences arm movement control. J Neurophysiol 69: 504-511, 1993.
11. HOWARD IP AND CHILDERSON L. The contribution of motion, the visual frame and visual polarity to sensation of body tilt. Perception 23: 753-762, 1994.
12. LACKNER JR. Some aspects of sensory-motor control and adaptation in man. In: Intersensory Perception and Sensory Integration, edited by Walk RD and Pick HL. NY: Plenum, 1981, p. 143-173.
13. LACKNER JR AND DIZIO P. Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J Neurophysiol 72: 299-313, 1994.
14. MIALL RC AND WOLPERT DM. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks 9: 1265-1279, 1996.
15. MORASSO P. Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42: 223-227, 1981.
16. PIGEON P, BORTOLAMI SB, DIZIO P, AND LACKNER JR. Arm reaching movements during voluntary trunk rotation involve compensation for self-generated Coriolis forces. Soc Neurosci Abstr 25: 1912, 1999.
17. SAINBERG RL, POIZNER H, AND GHEZ C. Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. J Neurophysiol 70: 2136-2147, 1993.
18. SHADMEHR R AND MUSSA-IVALDI FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14: 3208-3224, 1994.
19. WOLPERT DM. Computational approaches to motor control. Trends Cognit Sci 1: 209-216, 1997.