The role of vision in detecting and correcting fingertip force errors during object lifting

Journal of Vision

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-14

  Buckingham, Gavin ^a   Ranger, Nathalie S ^a   Goodale, Melvyn A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Memory; Spatial vision; Visual cognition

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FINGER; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; ILLUSION; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CUES; FEMALE; FINGERS; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; LIFTING; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79251555956     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/11.1.1     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alaerts, K., Senot, P., Swinnen, S. P., Craighero, L., Wenderoth, N., & Fadiga, L. (2010). The force requirements of observed object lifting are encoded by the observer's motor system: A TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 1144-1153.
2. Alaerts, K., Swinnen, S. P., & Wenderoth, N. (2010). Observing how others lift light and heavy objects: Which visual cues mediate the encoding of muscular force in the primary motor cortex? Neuropsychologia, 48, 2082-2090.
3. Bingham, G. P. (1987). Kinematic form and scaling: Further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 155-177.
4. Brayanov, J. B., & Smith, M. A. (2010). Bayesian and " anti-Bayesian" biases in sensory integration for action and perception in the size-weight illusion. Journal of Neurophysiology, 103, 1518-1531.
5. Buckingham, G., Cant, J. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2009). Living in a material world: How visual cues to material properties affect the way that we lift objects and perceive their weight. Journal of Neurophysiology, 102, 3111-3118.
6. Buckingham, G., & Goodale, M. A. (2010a). Lifting without Seeing: The role of vision in perceiving and acting upon the size weight illusion. PLoS ONE, 5, e9709.
7. Buckingham, G., & Goodale, M. A. (2010b). The influence of competing perceptual and motor priors in the context of the size-weight illusion. Experimental Brain Research, 205, 283-288.
8. Chang, E. C., Flanagan, J. R., & Goodale, M. A. (2008). The intermanual transfer of anticipatory force control in precision grip lifting is not influenced by the perception of weight. Experimental Brain Research, 185, 319-329.
9. Charpentier, A. (1891). Analyse expérimentale: De quelques éléments de la sensation de poids. Archive de Physiologie Normale et Pathologique, 3, 122-135.
10. Chouinard, P. A., Large, M. E., Chang, E. C., & Goodale,M. A. (2009). Dissociable neural mechanisms for determining the perceived heaviness of objects and the predicted weight of objects during lifting: An fMRI investigation of the size-weight illusion. Neuroimage, 44, 200-212.
11. Elliott, D. (1990). Intermittent visual pickup and goal directed movement: A review. Human Movement Science, 9, 531-548.
12. Ellis, R. R., & Lederman, S. J. (1993). The role of haptic versus visual volume cues in the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 315-324.
13. Ernst, M. O. (2009). Perceptual learning: Inverting the size-weight illusion. Current Biology, 19, R23-R25.
14. Ernst, M. O., & Bulthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 162-169.
15. Flanagan, J. R., & Beltzner, M. A. (2000). Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size-weight illusion. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 737-741.
16. Flanagan, J. R., Bittner, J. P., & Johansson, R. S. (2008). Experience can change distinct size-weight priors engaged when lifting objects and judging their weights. Current Biology, 18, 1742-1747.
17. Gescheider, G. (1997). Psychophysics: The fundamentals (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Gordon, A. M., Westling, G., Cole, K. J., & Johansson, R. (1993). Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects. Journal of Neurophysiology, 69, 1789-1796.
19. Grandy, M. S., & Westwood, D. A. (2006). Opposite perceptual and sensorimotor responses to a size- weight illusion. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95, 3887-3892.
20. Hartcher-O'Brien, J., Gallace, A., Krings, B., Koppen, C., & Spence, C. (2006). When vision 'extinguishes' touch in neurologically-normal people: Extending the Colavita visual dominance effect. Experimental Brain Research, 186, 643-658.
21. Heath, M. (2005). Role of limb and target vision in the online control of memory-guided reaches. Motor Control, 9, 281-309.
22. Johansson, R. S., & Flanagan, J. R. (2009). Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 345-359.
23. Johansson, R. S., & Westling, G. (1984). Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Experimental Brain Research, 56, 550-564.
24. Kawai, S., Henigman, F.,MacKenzie, C. L., Kuang, A. B.,& Faust, P. H. (2007). A reexamination of the size-weight illusion induced by visual size cues. Experimental Brain Research, 179, 443-456.
25. Kording, K. P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004). Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature, 427, 244-247.
26. Loh, M. N., Kirsch, L., Rothwell, J. C., Lemon, R. N., & Davare, M. (2010). Information about the weight of grasped objects from vision and internal models interacts within the primary motor cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 6984-6990.
27. Luck, S. J. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
28. Masin, C. M., & Crestoni, L. (1988). Experimental demonstration of the sensory basis of the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 309-312.
29. Sarlenga, F., Baud-Bovy, G., & Danion, F. (2010). Delayed visual feedback affect both manual tracking and grip force control when transporting a hand-held object. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104, 627-640.
30. Striemer, C., Chapman, C., & Goodale, M. A. (2009). 'Real-time' obstacle avoidance in the absence of primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15996-16001.
31. Vaillancourt, D. E., Haibach, P. S., & Newell, K. M. (2006). Visual angle is the critical variable mediating gain-related effects in manual control. Experimental Brain Research, 173, 742-750.
32. Westwood, D. A., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action. Spatial Vision, 16, 243-254.
33. Zwislocki, J. J., & Goodman, D. A. (1980). Absolute scaling of sensory magnitudes: A validation. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 28-38.