A hierarchical model of e-government service capability: An empirical analysis

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 564-572

  Hu, Guangwei ^a,b   Shi, Jin ^a   Pan, Wenwen ^c   Wang, Jie ^d  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^c Nanjing College for Population Program Management ^*  (China)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY NORTHWEST   (United States)

Author keywords

Capability management; E gov service; Empirical analysis; Mediation effect; SEM; Service capability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866295482     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Amit R., Schoemaker P.J. The competitive dynamics of capabilities: Developing strategic assets for multiple futures. Wharton on dynamic competitive strategy 1997, 368-394. Wiley, New York. G. Day, D. Reibstein (Eds.).
2. Anbazhagan M., Nagarajan A. Understanding quality of service for web services Retrieved 2010, 12/6, from:. http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-quality.html.
3. Augier M., Teece D.J. Strategy as evolution with design: The foundations of dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in the economic system. Organization Studies 2008, 29(8-9):1187-1208.
4. Baker D.L. Advancing e-government performance in the United States through enhanced usability benchmarks. Government Information Quarterly 2009, 26(1):82-88.
5. Baldrige National Quality Program Criteria for performance excellence Retrieved 2006, 10/2, from. http://www.quality.nist.gov.
6. Barki H., Rivard S., Talbot J. An integrative contingency model of software project risk management. Journal of Management Information Systems 2001, 17(4):37-69.
7. Barney J.B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 1991, 17(1):99-120.
8. Bharadwaj A.S. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly 2000, 24(1):169-196.
9. Bon J.V. Foundations of IT service management, based on ITIL 2007, Van Haren Publishing, Zaltbommel.
10. Carter L., Bélanger F. The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal 2005, 5(1):5-25.
11. Chen C.W. Impact of quality antecedents on taxpayer satisfaction with online tax-filing systems: An empirical study. Information Management 2010, 47(5-6):308-315.
12. Chou T.-C., Chang P.-L., Cheng Y.-P., Tsai C.-T. A path model linking organizational knowledge attributes, information processing capabilities, and perceived usability. Information Management 2007, 44(4):408-417.
13. Cresswell M.C., Pardo T.A., Canestraro D.S. Digital capability assessment for egovernment: A multi-dimensional approach. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2006, 4084:293-304.
14. Delone W.H., McLean E.R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 2003, 19(4):9-30.
15. Dias G.P., Rafael J.A. A simple model and a distributed architecture for realizing one-stop e-government. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2007, 6(1):81-90.
16. Dutta S., Narasimhan O., Rajiv S. Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: Methodology and empirical application. Strategic Management Journal 2005, 26(3):277-285.
17. EIPA Common assessment framework Retrieved 2010, 21/01, from. http://www.eipa.eu/en/topic/show/&tid=191.
18. Evans D.Y., David C. E-government: Evolving relationship of citizens and government, domestic, and international development. Government Information Quarterly 2006, 23(2):207-235.
19. Gouscos D., Kalikakis M., Legal M., Papadopoulou S. A general model of performance and quality for one-stop e-government service offerings. Government Information Quarterly 2007, 24(4):860-885.
20. Gronlund A. e-democracy: In search of tools and methods for effective participation. Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis 2003, 12(2-3):93-100.
21. Halchin L.E. Electronic government: Government capability and terrorist resource. Government Information Quarterly 2004, 21(4):406-419.
22. Helfat C.E., Peteraf M.A. The dynamic resource based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal 2003, 24(10):997-1010.
23. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 1999, 6(1):1-55.
24. Hu G., Pan W., Lu M., Wang J. Electronic government services integration degree: An empirical study. 2008 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing 2008, (WiCOM 2008).
25. Hu G., Zhong W., Mei S. Electronic public service (EPS) and its implementation in Chinese local governments. International Journal of Electronic Governance 2008, 1(2):118-138.
26. Hung S.Y., Chang C.M., Yu T.J. Determinants of user acceptance of the e-government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly 2006, 23(1):97-122.
27. IBM IBM information on demand: Unlocking the business value of information for competitive advantage Information on demand Retrieved 2010, 18/10, from. http://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/data/pubs/papers/iod-2.pdf.
28. Jaeger P.T., Thompson K.M. Social information behavior and the democratic process: Information poverty, normative behavior, and electronic government in the United States. Library and Information Science Research 2004, 26(1):94-107.
29. Kim T.H., Im K.H., Park S.C. Intelligent measuring and improving model for customer satisfaction level in e-government. Proceedings of Electronic Government: The 4th International Conference, EGOV 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 2005.
30. Kim S., Lee H. Organizational factors affecting knowledge sharing capabilities in e-government: An empirical study. Proceedings of the 2004 Annual National Conference on Digital Government Research 2004, 281-293.
31. Koh C.E., Prybutok V.R., Zhang X. Measuring e-government readiness. Information Management 2008, 45(8):540-546.
32. Landrum H., Prybutok V.R., Zhang X. A comparison of Magal's service quality instrument with SERVPERF. Information Management 2007, 44(1):104-113.
33. Larsen E., Rainie L. The rise of the e-citizen: How people use government agencies' Websites. Washington DC7 Pew Internet and American Life Project Retrieved 2010, 18/10, from. http://www.fcw.gov.
34. Layne K., Lee J.W. Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly 2001, 18(2):122-136.
35. Lyytinen K., Robey D. Learning failure in information systems development. Information Systems Journal 1999, 9(2):85-101.
36. Ma L., Chung J., Thorson S. E-government in China: Bringing economic development through administrative reform. Government Information Quarterly 2005, 22(1):20-37.
37. McDonald R.P., Ho M.R. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis. Psychological Methods 2002, 7:64-82.
38. McNaughton B., Ray P., Lewis L. Designing an evaluation framework for IT service management. Information Management 2010, 47(4):219-225.
39. Meo P.D., Quattrone G., Ursino D. A multiagent system for assisting citizens in their search of e-government services. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part C, Applications and Reviews 2008, 38(5):686-698.
40. Papadomichelaki X.B.M., Halaris C., Apostolou D., Mentzas G. A review of quality dimensions in e-government services. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2006, 4084:128-138.
41. Raine-Eudy R. Using structural equation modeling to test for differential reliability and validity: An empirical demonstration. Structural Equation Modeling 2000, 7(1):124-141.
42. Segars A.H., Grover V. Profiles of strategic information systems planning. Information Systems Research 1999, 10(3):199-232.
43. Steyaert J.C. Measuring the performance of electronic government services. Information Management 2004, 41(3):369-375.
44. Teece D.J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 2007, 28(13):1319-1350.
45. UNDESA UN e-government survey 2010: Leveraging e-government at a time of financial and economic crisis Retrieved 2010, 04/12, from. http://www2.unpan.org/egovkb/global_reports/10report.htm.
46. Wang C.L., Ahmed P.K. Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 2007, 9(1):31-51.
47. Wang Y.-S., Liao Y.-W. Assessing egovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government Information Quarterly 2008, 25(4):717-733.
48. Webb H.W., Webb L.A. Sitequal: An integrated measure of web site quality. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 2004, 17(6):430-440.
49. West D.M. Global e-government Retrieved 2005, 12/08, from. http://www.insidepolitics.org/egovt05int.pdf.
50. West D.M. Global e-government Retrieved 2006, 06/07, from. http://www.fundap.sp.gov.br/ti/ht/artigos/global%20egovt06int.pdf.
51. Wimmer M.A., Traunmuller R. Perspectives e-government 2020: Results and conclusions from the EC Roadmap 2020 Project. 2008 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From theory to applications 1-5 2008, 174-177. 2649.