Governing Iberian Rivers: From bilateral management to common basin governance?

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 251-268

  Lopes, Paula Duarte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

European Union; Hydro hegemony; Portugal; Sovereignty; Spain; Water governance

Indexed keywords

BILATERAL AGREEMENT; EUROPEAN UNION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; RIVER WATER; SOVEREIGNTY; TRANSBOUNDARY COOPERATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER RESOURCE;

IBERIAN PENINSULA; PORTUGAL; SPAIN;

EID: 84865829557     PISSN: 15679764     EISSN: 15731553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10784-012-9175-0     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ackerman, J., & Tir, J. (2003). To share or not to share: Conditions affecting signing of river-managing treaties between riparian states. Paper presented at the international studies association annual convention, Portland, United States of America, February 25 to March 1, 2003.
2. Alam, U. (2002). Questioning the water wars rational: A case study of the Indus Waters Treaty. The Geographical Journal, 168(4), 354-364.
3. Almeida, A. B. d., Portela, M. M., & Machado, M. (2009). A case of transboundary water agreement-the Albufeira Convention. STRIVER Technical Brief No. 9.
4. Bakker, K. J. (2003). An uncooperative commodity: Privatizing Water in England and Wales (Oxford Geographical and Environmental Studies). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Barraqué, B. (Ed.). (1995). As Políticas da Água na Europa. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget.
6. Barraqué, B., & Mostert, E. (2006). Transboundary river basin management in Europe. Human Development Report Office, Occasional Paper 21.
7. Blatter, J., & Ingram, H. (Eds.). (2001). Reflection on water: New approaches to transboundary conflicts and cooperation. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press.
8. Bukowski, J. J. (2011). Sharing water on the Iberian Peninsula: A Europeanisation approach to explaining transboundary cooperation. Water Alternatives, 4(2), 171-196.
9. Cascão, A. E. (2008). Ethiopia-challenges to Egyptian hegemony in the Nile basin. Water Policy, 10(S2), 13-28.
10. CNPGB n/a. Barragem de Alqueva. Comissão Nacional Portuguesa das Grandes Barragens. http://cnpgb. inag. pt/gr_barragens/gbportugal/Alqueva. htm. Accessed July 26, 2010.
11. Collier, U., Golub, J., & Kreher, A. (Eds.). (1997). Subsidiarity and shared responsibility: New challenges for EU environmental policy. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
12. Conca, K. (2005). Governing water: Contentious transnational politics and global institution building. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Correia, F. N. (1991). A problemática da água no contexto do ambiente em Portugal. In: MARN (Ed.), Livro Branco sobre o Estado do Ambiente em Portugal-Anexos. Lisboa: Ministério do Ambiente e Recursos Naturais.
14. Correia, F. N. (1996). O que separa também une. In Proceedings of the Conferência Portugal-Espanha "O que separa também une" (pp. 91-112). Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa.
15. Cunha, L. V. d. (1996). Recursos Hídricos Luso-Espanhóis. O passado e o futuro. Paper presented at the III Congresso da Associação Portuguesa de Recursos Hídricos, Lisboa.
16. Daoudy, M. (2008). Hydro-hegemony and international water law: Laying claims to water rights. Water Policy, 10(S2), 89-102.
17. Ekers, M., & Loftus, A. (2008). The power of water: Developing dialogues between Foucault and Gramsci. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(4), 698-718.
18. European Environment Agency (2010). The European environment: State and outlook 2010 http://www. eea. europa. eu/soer. Consulted April 2, 2012.
19. Falkenmark, M., & Folke, C. (2002). The ethics of socio-ecohydrological catchment management: Towards hydrosolidarity. Hydrology and Earth Systems Science, 6(1), 1-9.
20. Fowler, M. R., & Bunck, K. M. (1995). Law, power and the sovereign state: The evolution and application of the concept of sovereignty. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
21. Freire, M. R., & Lopes, P. D. (2008). Reconceptualizar a paz e a violência: Uma análise crítica. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 82, 13-29.
22. Gerlak, A. K., Lautze, J., & Giordano, M. (2011). Water resources data and information exchange in transboundary water treaties. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11, 179-199.
23. Gutiérrez, R. (2006). Between knowledge and politics: The role of Técnicos in the Brazilian water management reform. PhD dissertation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University.
24. INAG. (2004). Plano Nacional da Água (Vol. I). Lisboa: Instituto Nacional da Água.
25. Jägerskog, A. (2002). Contributions of Regime Theory in Understanding Interstate Water Cooperation: Lessons Learned in the Jordan River Basin. In A. R. Turton & R. Henwood (Eds.), Hydropolitics in the developing world: A Southern African perspective (pp. 73-78). Pretoria: African Water Issues Research Unit (AWIRU).
26. Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press.
27. Krasner, S. D. (1983). Structural causes and regimes consequences: regimes as intervening variables. In S. D. Krasner (Ed.), International regimes (pp. 1-22). Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press.
28. Kreijen, G. (Ed.). (2002). State, sovereignty and international governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Lipper, J. (1967). Equitable utilization. In A. H. Garretson, R. D. Hayton, & C. J. Olmstead (Eds.), The law of international drainage basin. Dobbs Ferry: Oceana Publications.
30. Lopes, P. D. (2001). As políticas da água de Foz Côa. In M. E. Gonçalves (Ed.), O caso de Foz Côa: um laboratório de análise socio-política (pp. 65-102). Lisboa: Edições 70.
31. Lopes, P. D. (2009). Sharing water: Evolution, threats and challenges. Lusotopie, 16(1), 177-192.
32. Lopez-Gunn, E. (2009). Agua para todos: A new regionalist hydraulic paradigm in Spain. Water Alternatives, 2(3), 370-394.
33. MOPMA. (1993). Plan Hidrológico Nacional. Memoria. Madrid: Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Medio Ambiente.
34. Saleh, S. M. K. (2008). Hydro-hegemony in the Nile basin: A sudanese perspective. Water Policy, 10(S2), 29-49.
35. Saramago, J. (2008). Espanha quer mais água de Alqueva. Correio da Manhã.
36. Shiva, V. (2002). Water wars: Privatization, pollution and profit. Cambridge: South End Press.
37. Suhardiman, D., and Giordano, M. (2012). Process-focused analysis in transboundary water governance research. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. doi: 10. 1007/s10784-012-9176-z.
38. Swyngedouw, E. (1999). Modernity and hybridity: Regeneracionismo, the production of nature and the Spanish waterscape, 1890-1930. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(3), 443-465.
39. Swyngedouw, E. (2007). Technonatural revolutions: The scalar politics of Franco's hydrosocial dream for Spain 1939-1975. Transactions Institute British Geographers, 32(1), 9-28.
40. Vlachos, E., & Correia, F. N. (Eds.). (2000). Shared water systems and transboundary issues, with special emphasis on the Iberian Peninsula. Lisboa: Fundação Luso-Americana para o Desenvolvimento.
41. Warner, J. (2004). Plugging the GAP-working with Buzan: The Illisu Dam as a security issue. SOAS Water Issues Study Group, Occasional Paper 67.
42. Warner, J. (2005). Hydro-hegemony as a layered cake: Hydro-hegemonic strategies in the case of Turkey. Paper presented at the First Workshop on Hydro-Hegemony: London Water Research Group, University of London. 2005.
43. Warner, J. (2008). Contested hydrohegemony: Hydraulic control and security in Turkey. Water Alternatives, 1(2), 271-288.
44. Warner, J. (2012). The struggle over Turkey's Ili{dotless}su dam: Domestic and international security linkages. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. doi: 10. 1007/s10784-012-9178-x.
45. Warner, J., & Zawahri, N. (2012). Hegemony and asymmetry: Multiple-chessboard games on transboundary rivers. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. doi: 10. 1007/s10784-012-9177-y.
46. Wegerich, K. (2008). Hydro-hegemony in the Amu Darya Basin. Water Policy, 10(S2), 71-88.
47. Williams, P. (2003). The security politics of enclosing transboundary river water resources. Paper presented at the conference on resource politics and security in a global age, University of Sheffield.
48. Wolf, A. T. (1995). Hydropolitics along the Jordan River: Scarce water and Its impacts on the Arab-Israeli conflict. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
49. Wolf, A. (2003). 'Water Wars' and Other Tales of Hydromythology. In B. McDonald & D. Jehl (Eds.), Whose water is it? The unquenchable thirst of a water-hungry world (pp. 109-124). Washington D. C.: National Geographic.
50. Woodhouse, M., & Zeitoun, M. (2008). Hydro-hegemony and international water law: Grappling with the gaps of power and law. Water Policy, 10(S2), 103-119.
51. Zawahri, N. A., & Hensengerth, O. (2012). Domestic environmental activists and the governance of the Ganges and Mekong Rivers in India and China. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. doi: 10. 1007/s10784-012-9179-9.
52. Yoffe, S. B. (2001). Basins at risk: Conflict and cooperation over international freshwater resources. PhD Dissertation. Portland: Oregon State University.
53. Zeitoun, M., & Allan, J. A. (2008). Applying hegemony and power theory to transboundary water analysis. Water Policy, 10(2), 3-12.
54. Zeitoun, M., & Mirumachi, N. (2011). Transboundary water interaction I: Reconsidering conflict and cooperation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8, 297-316.
55. Zeitoun, M., Mirumachi, N., & Warner, J. (2011). Transboundary water interaction II: The influence of 'soft' power. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11, 159-178.
56. Zeitoun, M., & Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-hegemony-a framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8, 435-460.