Hegemony and asymmetry: Multiple-chessboard games on transboundary rivers

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 215-229

  Warner, Jeroen ^a   Zawahri, Neda ^b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Asymmetry; Hegemony; Hydropolitics; Transboundary rivers; Two level games

Indexed keywords

ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; GEOPOLITICS; HEGEMONY; LAW ENFORCEMENT; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLITICAL CHANGE; POLITICAL CONFLICT; RIVER; TRANSBOUNDARY COOPERATION;

EID: 84865833557     PISSN: 15679764     EISSN: 15731553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10784-012-9177-y     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the republic. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
2. Aydin, M. (2003). Securitization of history and geography. Understanding of security in Turkey. Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 3(2), 163-184.
3. Balaban, S. (2006). Dynamics of three level games and implications for policy making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association. http://www. allacademic. com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/6/9/0/5/pages69050/p69050-2. php.
4. Bernauer, T., & Kuhn, P. (2010). Is there an environmental version of the Kantian peace? Insights from water pollution in Europe. European Journal of International Relations, 16(1), 77-102.
5. Bressers, J., & Lulofs, K. (2010). Governance and complexity in water management. Creating cooperation through boundary spanning. London: Edward Arnold.
6. Burton, J. W. (1972). World society. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Crow, B., & Singh, N. (2000). Impediments and innovations in international rivers: The waters of South Asia. World Development, 28(11), 1907-1925.
8. Currie-Alder, B. (2007). Unpacking participatory NRM: Distinguishing resource capture from democratic governance. In J. Warner (Ed.), Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated water management. Aldershot: Ashgate.
9. Daoudy, M. (2009). 'Asymmetric power. Negotiating Water in the Euphrates and Tigris', International Negotiation, 14, 359-389.
10. de Vries, J. (2008). Breaking the deadlock. Lessons from cross-border spatial projects in Flanders and The Netherland. disP, 172, 48-62.
11. Dieperink, C. (2011). 'International water negotiations under asymmetry, lessons from the Rhine chlorides dispute settlement (1931-2004)'. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11(2), 139-157.
12. Edmunds, D., & Wollenberg, E. (2001). A strategic approach to multistakeholder negotiations. Development and Change, 32(2), 231-253.
13. Gerlak, A., Lautze, J., & Giordano, M. (2011). Water resources data and information exchange in transboundary water treaties. International Environmental Agreements, 11, 179-199.
14. Giordano, M. A., & Wolf, A. T. (2003). Sharing waters: Post-Rio international water management. Natural Resources Forum, 27, 163-171.
15. Haufler, V. (1993). Crossing the boundary between public and private. In V. Rittberger (Ed.), Regime theory and international relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16. Haugaard, M. (2006). Conceptual confrontation. In M. Haugaard & H. H. Lentner (Eds.), Hegemony and power: Consensus and coercion in contemporary politics. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
17. Huitema, D., & Meijerink, S. (2010). Realizing water transitions: the role of policy entrepreneurs in water policy change. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 26.
18. Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. London, UK and Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
19. Kistin, E. J. (2006). Qualifying cooperation over transboundary waters. Water for Africa paper. http://splash. bradford. ac. uk/files/myFile_Kistin%20seminar%206. pdf.
20. Knopf, J. W. (1994). Beyond two-level games: Domestic-international interaction in the intermediate-range nuclear forces negotiations. International Organization, 47(4), 599-628.
21. Le Marquand, D. (1977). International rivers: The politics of cooperation. Vancover: West Water Research Centre, University of British Colombia.
22. Lowi, M. R. (1993). Water and power: The politics of a scarce resource in the Jordan River basin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
24. Milner, H. V. (1997). Interests, institutions, and information: domestic politics and international relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25. Milner, H., & Moravcsik, A. (Eds.). (2009). Power, interdependence and non-state actors in world politics: Research frontiers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26. Mirumachi, N. and J. A. Allan (2007). Revisiting transboundary Water. power, conflict, cooperation and the political economy. Proceedings from CAIWA international conference on adaptive and integrated water management: Coping with scarcity, November 12-15, 2007, Basel, Switzerland.
27. Morin, J. F. (2010). The two-level game of transnational networks: The case of the access to medicines campaign. SSRN Working paper series; Available at SSRN: http://ssrn. com/abstract=1576433.
28. Morrow, A., & Al-Omrani, K. Moussa (2010). Upstream states challenge Egypt over Nile waters. 15 June. Online: ipsnews. net/news. asp?idnews=51823. Last consulted 23 March 2012.
29. Nye, J. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Basic Books.
30. Ohlsson, L. (1995). Hydropolitics. London: Zed Books.
31. Ohlsson, L., and Turton, A. R. (1999). The turning of a screw: social resource scarcity as a bottle-neck in adaption to water scarcity. SOAS Occasional Paper No. 19. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
32. Prys, M. (2008). Developing a contextually relevant concept of regional hegemony: The case of South Africa, Zimbabwe and 'Quiet Diplomacy,' GIGA working paper No. 77, 2008.
33. Putnam, R. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42, 427-460.
34. Scott, J. (1995). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Connecticut: Yale University Press.
35. Shapland, G. (1995). Policy options for downstream states in the Middle East. In J. A. Allan & C. Mallat (Eds.), Water in the Middle East: Legal, political and commercial implications (pp. 301-323). London: IB Tauris.
36. Sosland, J. K. (2007). Cooperating rivals: The riparian politics of the Jordan River basin. New York, USA: State University of New York Press.
37. Starr, J., & Stoll, D. (1988). The politics of scarcity. Water in the Middle East. Boulder: Westview Press.
38. Tir, J., & Ackerman, J. (2009). Politics of formalized river cooperation. Journal of Peace Research, 46(5), 623-640.
39. Tir, J., & Stinnett, D. (2011). The institutional design of riparian treaties: The role of river issue. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(4), 606-631.
40. Trondalen, J. M. (2009). Climate change, water security, and possible remedies for the Middle East. The United Nations World Water Assessment Programs. http://unesdoc. unesco. org/images/0018/001818/181886e. pdf.
41. Warner, J. (2004). Mind the GAP-working with Buzan: The Illisu Dam as a security issue. SOAS water issues study group, school of oriental and African Studies/King's College: London (Occasional Paper 67).
42. Warner, J. (2008). Contested hydro-hegemony/hydraulic control and security in Turkey. Water Alternatives, 1(2), 271-288.
43. Warner, J. (2010). Hydrohegemonic politics: A crossroads on the Euphrates-Tigris? In K. Wegerich & J. Warner (Eds.), The politics of water. London: Routledge.
44. Warner, J., & van Buuren, A. (2009). Multi-stakeholder learning and fighting on the river Scheldt. International Negotiation, 14(2), 419-440.
45. Watson, A. (2007). Hegemony and history. London: Routledge.
46. Wegerich, K., & Warner, J. (Eds.). (2010). The politics of water. London: Routledge.
47. Weiss, J. C. (2010). Autocratic Audiences, international bargaining, and nationalist protest in China. http://www9. georgetown. edu/faculty/jrv24/Weiss_08. pdf.
48. Werners, S. E., Warner, J., & Roth, D. (2010). Opponents and supporters of water policy change in the Netherlands and Hungary. Water Alternatives, 3(1), 26-47.
49. Wesselink, A., Warner, J., & M. Kok (2011). You gain some funding, you lose some freedom: The ironies of better flood protection in Limburg (The Netherlands). Paper presented during the interpretative studies association annual conference 20011 in Cardiff, July 2011.
50. Williams, P. (2002). The competent boundary spanner. Public Administration, 80(1), 103-124.
51. Williams, P. (2003). The security politics of enclosing transboundary river water resources. Paper presented at the International Conference on Resource Politics and Security in a Global Age, University of Sheffield (UK), June 26-28, 2003.
52. Wolf, A. (1995). Hydropolitics along the Jordan river. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
53. Wolf, A. (1998). Conflict and cooperation along international waterways. Water Policy, 1(2), 251-265.
54. Zawahri, N. (2006). Stabilising Iraq's water supply: What the Euphrates and Tigris can learn from the Indus. Third World Quarterly, 27(6), 1041-1058.
55. Zawahri, N. (2008). International rivers and national security: The Euphrates, Ganges-Brahmaputra, Indus, Tigris, and Yarmouk Rivers. Natural Resources Forum, 32, 280-289.
56. Zawahri, N. (2010). Governing the Jordan river system: History, challenges, and outlook (pp. 127-147). Water Resources: Journal of Transboundary.
57. Zawahri, A., Dinar, S., & Mitchell, S. (2011). Facilitating treaty formation to govern international rivers. International Studies Quarterly, 55(3), 803-807.
58. Zawahri, N., & Mitchell, S. (2011). Fragmented governance of international rivers: Negotiating Bilateral versus Multilateral Treaties. International Studies Quarterly, 55(3), 835-858.
59. Zeitoun, M., Mirumachi, N., & Warner, J. (2011). Transboundary water interaction II: Soft power underlying conflict and cooperation. International Environmental Agreements, 11, 159-178.
60. Zeitoun, M., & Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-hegemony: A framework for analysis of transboundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8, 435-460.