Process-focused analysis in transboundary water governance research

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 299-308

  Suhardiman, Diana ^a   Giordano, Mark ^b  

^a INTERNATIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE   (Laos)

^b INTERNATIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE   (Sri Lanka)

Author keywords

Hydro hegemony; Networks; Power asymmetry; Room for manoeuvre; Transboundary waters

Indexed keywords

ASYMMETRY; DECISION MAKING; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; NEGOTIATION PROCESS; NETWORK DESIGN; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; POWER RELATIONS; RESEARCH WORK; TRANSBOUNDARY COOPERATION; WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84865805070     PISSN: 15679764     EISSN: 15731553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10784-012-9176-z     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bakker, K. (1999). The politics of hydropower: Developing the Mekong. Political Geography, 18, 209-232.
2. Bangkok Post. (2011). Thai greens step up campaign against Laos' Xayabury dam. February 2.
3. Bhaduri, A., & Barbier, E. B. (2008). Political altruism of transboundary water sharing. The B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 8: Issue 1 (Topics), 32, 1-28.
4. Brochmann, M., & Gleditsch, N. P. (2006). Conflict, cooperation and good governance in international river basins. International conference-governance and the global water system: Institutions, actors, scales of water governance facing the challenges of global change. Global water systems project, Bonn, Germany, 20-23 June 2006.
5. Conca, K. (2006). Governing water: Contentious transnational politics and global institutional building. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
6. Dellapenna, J. (1994). Treaties as instruments for managing Internationally-shared water resources: Restricted sovereignty vs. community of property. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 26, 25-56.
7. Delli-Priscoli, J. (1996). Conflict resolution, collaboration and management. International water resource issues. Alternative dispute resolution series. Working paper 6. Institute for Water Resources, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC, 48 pp.
8. Dieperink, C. (2011). International water negotiations under asymmetry. Lessons from the Rhine chlorides dispute settlement (1931-2004). International Environmental Agreements, 11, 139-157.
9. Earle, A., Jagerskog, A., & Ojendal, J. (2010). Transboundary water management: Principles and practice. London: Earthscan.
10. Falkenmark, M., & Folke, C. (2002). The ethics of socio-ecohydrological catchment management: Towards hydrosolidarity. Hydrology and Earth Systems Science, 6(1), 1-9.
11. Furlong, K. (2006). Hidden theories, troubled waters: International relations, the territorial trap and the Southern African development community's transboundary waters. Political Geography, 25, 438-458.
12. Glassman, J. (2001). From Seattle (and Ubon) to Bangkok: The scales of resistance to corporate globalisation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19, 513-533.
13. Goldensohn, M. D. (1994). Participation and empowerment: An assessment of water user associations in Asia and Egypt. Virginia, USA: Irrigation Support Project for Asia and the Near East.
14. Grey, D., & Sadoff, C. (2006). Water for growth and development (thematic documents of the IV World Water Forum). Mexico City, Mexico: Comision Nacional del Agua.
15. Hirsch, P., & Cheong, G. (1996). Natural resources management in the Mekong river basin: Perspectives for Australian Development Cooperation. Sydney: AusAID and University of Sydney.
16. Hirsch, P., & Jensen, K. M. (2006). National interests and transboundary water governance in the Mekong. Draft report. Sidney: Australian Mekong Research Centre.
17. Karkkainen, B. C. (2002). Post-sovereign environmental governance: The collaborative problem solving model. In E. Biermann, R. Brohm,& K. Dingwerth (Eds.), Global environmental change and the Nation State (pp. 206-216). Postdam, Germany, Postdam Institute for Climate Impact research.
18. Landovsky, J. (2006). Institutional assessment of transboundary water resources management. Human development report 2006. Occasional paper: Human Development Report Office, New York, USA.
19. Lautze, J., & Giordano, M. (2007). Demanding supply management and supplying demand management: Transboundary waters in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Environment and Development, 16, 290-306.
20. McCaffrey, S. (1997). Water scarcity: Institutional and legal responses. In E. H. P. Brans, E. J. De Haan, A. Noelkaemper, & N. Rinzema (Eds.), The scarcity of water: Emerging legal and policy responses (pp. 43-58). London: Kluwer Law International Ltd.
21. Mitchell, R. B. (2003). International environmental agreements: A survey of their features, formation, and effects. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 429, 438-439.
22. Molle, F., & Hoanh, C. T. (2009). Implementing integrated river basin management: Lessons from the Red River Basin, Vietnam. IWMI Research Report No. 131. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IWMI.
23. Molle, F., Wester, P., & Hirsch, P. (2010). River basin closure: Processes, implications and responses. Agricultural Water Management, 97(4), 569-577.
24. Raadgever, G. T., Mostert, E., Kranz, N., Interwies, E., & Timmerman, J. G. (2008). Assessing management regimes in transboundary river basins: Do they support adaptive management? Ecology and Society, 13, 1-14.
25. Sadoff, C., & Grey, D. (2002). Beyond the river: The benefits of cooperation on international rivers. Water Policy, 4, 389-403.
26. Sneddon, C., & Fox, C. (2006). Rethinking transboundary waters: A critical hydropolitics of the Mekong basin. Political Geography, 25, 181-202.
27. Sneddon, C., & Fox, C. (2007). Transboundary river basin agreements in the Mekong and Zambezi basins: Enhancing environmental security or securitizing the environment? International Environmental Agreements, 7, 237-261.
28. Suhardiman, D., Giordano, M., & Molle., F. (2012). Scalar disconnect: The logic of transboundary water governance in the Mekong. Society and Natural Resources, 25(6), 572-586.
29. Swyngedouw, E. (2003). Globalization or glocalisation? Networks, territories and re-scaling. Reader in Economic Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Wise, C. R. (2010). Organizations of the future: Greater hybridization coming. Public Administration Review, 164-166.
31. Wolf, A., Yoffe, S., & Giordano, M. (2003). Basins at risk: The determinants of conflict and cooperation over international transboundary waters. Water Policy, 5, 31-62.
32. Zawahri, N. A., & Hensengerth, O. (2012). Domestic environmental activists and the governance of the Ganges and Mekong Rivers in India and China. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. doi: 10. 1007/s10784-012-9179-9.
33. Zeitoun, M., & Mirumachi, N. (2008). Transboundary water interaction I: Reconsidering conflict and cooperation. International Environmental Agreements, 8, 297-316.
34. Zeitoun, M., Mirumachi, N., & Warner, J. (2011). Transboundary water interaction II: The influence of 'soft' power. International environmental agreements 11, 159-178 (this issue).
35. Zeitoun, M., & Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-Hegemony: A framework for analysis of transboundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8, 435-460.