Contested hydrohegemony: Hydraulic control and security in Turkey

Water Alternatives

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 271-288

  Warner, Jeroen ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Hegemony; Hydropolitics; Multi level governance; Tigris; Turkey

Indexed keywords

EID: 55649116065     PISSN: 19650175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Aydin, M. 2003. Securitization of history and geography: Understanding of security in Turkey. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 3(2): 163-184.
2. Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M.S. 1970. Power and poverty: Theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Bakker, K. 1999. The politics of hydropower: Developing the Mekong. Political Geography 18 (2): 209-232.
4. Bari, Z. 1977. Syrian-Iraqi disputes over the river Euphrates. International Studies 16(2): 227-244.
5. Beaumont, P. 1991. Transboundary water disputes in the Middle East. Paper presented at an international conference on transboundary waters in the Middle East: Prospects for Regional Cooperation. Bilkent University, Ankara, September 2-3.
6. Beetham, D. 1991. The legitimation of power. Basingstoke, UK: MacMillan.
7. Bially Mattern, J. 2005. Why 'soft power' isn't so soft. Representational force and the sociolinguistic construction of attraction in world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33(3): 583-612.
8. Bidaseca, K. 2004. La lucha por no silenciar el río y por recuperar el control del agua. Resistencias locales y globales en Narmada y Cochabamba. In Warner, J. and Moreyra, A. (Eds), Conflictos y participación. Uso múltiple del agua, pp. 59-73. Montevideo: Nordan.
9. Biersteker, T.J. 1992. The "triumph" of neoclassical economics in the developing world: Policy convergence and bases of governance in the international economic order. In Rosenau, J.N. and Czempiel E.-O. (Eds), Governance without government: Order and change in world politics, pp. 102-131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Brennsell, A. 2005. Ilisu staudamm zu verkaufen. Tageszeitung taz, September 24. www.taz.de/pt/2005/09/24/a0152.nf/text.ges,1%20.
11. nd edition.
12. Cox, R.W. 1981. Social forces, states and world orders. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10(2): 126-55.
13. Daoudy, M. 2004. Turkey and Syria in water diplomacy 1962-2003, In Zereini, F. and Jaeschke, W. (Eds), Water in the Middle East and in North Africa: Resources, protection and management, pp. 319-332. New York: Springer.
14. Daoudy, M. 2005. Turkey and the region: Testing the links between power asymmetry and hydro-Hegemony. Presentation given at First Workshop on Hydro-hegemony, 21/22 May 2005, King's College London, London.
15. Davidson-Harden, A.; Naidoo, A. and Harden, A. 2007. The geopolitics of the water justice movement. Peace, Conflict and Development 11(11): 1-34.
16. Day, R.J.F. 2006. Gramsci is dead. Anarchist currents in the newest social movements. London: Pluto Press.
17. Dinar, S. 2008. Asymmetry and bargaining power in international environmental negotiations: The case of transboundary water. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 49th Annual Convention 'Bridging Multiple Divides', Hilton San Francisco, CA, USA, 26 March 2008. www.allacademic.com/meta/p253778_index.html.
18. Elsner, J. 1998. Imperial Rome and Christian triumph. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Ferguson, J. 1995. The anti-politics machine. "Development," depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Ferguson, N. 2003. Hegemony or empire? New York Times, August 19.
21. Foucault, M. 1991. Governmentality. In Burchell, G.; Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (Eds), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, pp. 87-104. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22. GAP-RDA. 1989. South-eastern Anatolia project master plan study. Nippon Koei Co. Ltd and Yuksel Proje A.S.; Ankara, Turkey.
23. Gramsci, A. 1971 [1922]. Selections from the prison notebooks. Edited and translated by Q. Hoare and G.N. Smith. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
24. nd Israeli-Palestinian International Conference, 10-14 October 2004. www.ipcri.org/watconf/papers/george.pdf.
25. Guner, S. 1997. The Turkish-Syrian war of attrition: The water dispute. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 20(1): 105-116.
26. Haugaard, M. and Lentner, H.H. 2006. Hegemony and power. Consensus and coercion in contemporary politics. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
27. Hermans, L. 2005. Actor analysis for water resources management. Putting the promise into practice. PhD thesis. Delft University, the Netherlands.
28. Jacoby, T. 2005. Semi-authoritarian incorporation and autocratic militarism in Turkey, Development and Change 36(4): 641-665.
29. Kaya, I. 1998. The Euphrates-Tigris basin. An interview and opportunities for cooperation under international law, Conflict resolution and transboundary water resources, Aridlands newsletter 44(Fall/Winter), http://ag.arizona.edu/oals/aln/aln44/kaya.
30. Kazan, I. 2005. Turkey: Where geopolitics still matters. Contemporary Security Policy 26(3): 588-604.
31. Kenon, H. 2003. Deal to buy water from Turkey finalized. Jerusalem Post, July 23.
32. Kibaroǧlu, A. 1996. Prospects for cooperation in the Euphrates-Tigris Basin. In Howsam, P. and Carter, R. (Eds), Water policy: Allocation and management in practice, pp. 31-39. London: E & FN Spon.
33. Kibaroǧlu, A. 2002. Building bridges between key stakeholders in the irrigation sector: GAP-RDA's operation and maintenance model. In Unver, O. and Gupta, R.K. (Eds), Water resources management: Crosscutting issues, pp. 171-192. Ankara: METU Press.
34. Kibaroǧlu, A. 2003. Settling the dispute over the water resources in the Euphrates-Tigris river basin. Stradigma, Middle East-Journal of Strategy and Analysis 6: 1-11, www.stradigma.com/turkce/temmuz2003/index.html.
35. Kibaroǧlu, A.; Klaphake, A.K.; Scheumann, W. and Carius, A. 2005. Cooperation on Turkey's transboundary resources. Status report commissioned by the German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, Berlin. F+E Project No. 903 19 226.
36. Kindleberger, C.P. 1981. Dominance and leadership in the international economy: Exploitation, public goods, and free rides. International Studies Quarterly 25(2): 242-254.
37. Kolars, J.F. and Mitchell, W.A. 1991. The Euphrates river and the Southeast Anatolia development project. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
38. Lipset, S.M. 1958. Some social requisites of democracy. American Political Science Review 53(1): 69-105.
39. Lowi, M. 1993. Water and power: The politics of a scarce resource in the Jordan river basin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Lukes, S. 1974. Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.
41. Lustick, I.S. 2002. Hegemony and the riddle of nationalism: The dialectics of nationalism and religion in the Middle East. Logos 1(3): 18-44.
42. MacQuarrie, P. 2004. Water security in the Middle East. Growing conflict over development in the Euphrates-Tigris basin. MSc thesis. Trinity College, Dublin.
43. Mearsheimer, J. 2001. The tragedy of great power politics. New York: WW Norton.
44. Meijerink S, 2008. Explaining continuity and change in international policies: Issue linkage, venue change, and learning on policies for the river Scheldt estuary 1967-2005. Environment and Planning A 40(4): 848-866.
45. Middle East Policy. 2007. Turkey's geopolitical role: The energy angle. March 22.
46. Middle East Times. 2006. Turkey, Israel scrap water project. April 7.
47. Migdal, J.S. 1988. Strong societies and weak states: State-society relations and state capabilities in the Third World. Princeton, NY, US: Princeton University Press.
48. Molle, F. 2006. Planning and managing water resources at the river basin level: Emergence and evolution of a concept. Comprehensive Assessment Research Report No. 16. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute.
49. Monbiot, G. 1999. Close down the export credit guarantee department. The Guardian, October 14.
50. Mutlu, S. 1996. The Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP) of Turkey: Its context, objectives, and prospects. Orient 37(1): 59-86.
51. Nye, J.S. 1990. Born to lead. The changing nature of American power. New York: Basic Books.
52. Overbeek, H. 1990. Global capitalism and national decline: The Thatcher decade in perspective. London: Unwin Hyman.
53. Petrella, R. 1998. Le manifeste de l'eau: Pour un contrat mondial. Bruxelles: Labor.
54. Peuch, J.-C. 2003. Turkey opens a second front. Asia Times, February 6.
55. Pijl, K. van der. 1992. Wereldorde en machtspolitiek: Visies op internationale betrekkingen van Dante tot Fukuyama. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
56. Reyes Gaskin, R. 2005. Distorted governmentality: The embedded biopolitics of dam resettlement. Journal of Politics & Society 16: 69-87, www.helvidius.org/files/2005/2005_Reyes-Gaskin.pdf.
57. Ronayne, M. 2005. The cultural and environmental impact of large dams in southeast Turkey: Fact-finding mission report. Kurdish Human Rights Project. www.khrp.org.
58. Rush, M. 1992. Politics and society. An introduction to political sociology. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
59. Schulz, M. 1995. A hydropolitical security complex: The case of Euphrates-Tigris. In Ohlsson, L. (Ed), Water resources: The politics of conflict, pp. 91-122. London: Zed Books.
60. Selby, J. 2003. Dressing up domination as 'co-operation': The case of Israeli-Palestinian water relations. Review of International Studies 29(1): 121-138.
61. Shiva, V. 2003. Bechtel and blood for water: War as an excuse for enlarging corporate rule. www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/after/2003/0512bechtelrule.htm .
62. Shoup, D. 2006. Can archaeology build a dam? Sites and politics in Turkey's Southeast Anatolia Project. Journal of Mediterranean Archeology 19(2): 231-258.
63. Snidal, D. 1985. Limits of hegemonic stability theory. International Organization 39(4): 579-615.
64. Starr, J.R. 1991. Water wars. Foreign Policy 82(Spring): 17-36.
65. Sun Tzu. 1988. The art of war. Translated by Thomas F. Cleary. Boston: Shambala Dragon.
66. Swyngedouw, E. 1999. Modernity and hybridity: Nature, Regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890-1930. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89(3): 443-465.
67. Syrian Arab Republic. 1999. Official Letter of Complaint from Syria to Turkey with regards to the Ilisu Dam.
68. Tilly, C. 1990. Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990-1992. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
69. Trottier, J. 1999. Hydropolitics in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Jerusalem: PASSIA.
70. Trottier, J. n.d. Exploring the making of the water war and water peace belief within the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. PC-CP Report. Paris: UNESCO, http://webworld.unesco.org/water/wwap/pccp/cd/pdf/history_future_shared_ water_resources/water_wars_hegemonic_concept.pdf.
71. Vidal, J. 2004. Israeli 'water for arms' deal with Turkey. The Guardian, January 6.
72. Warner, J. 2000. Global environmental security. In Stott, P. and Sullivan, S. (Eds), Political ecology. Science, myth and power, pp. 247-265. London: Edward Arnold.
73. Warner, J. 2004. Mind the GAP? Working with Buzan: The Ilisu dam as a security issue. SOAS Water Issues Group, Occasional Paper No. 67. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.
74. Warner, J.; Wester, P. and Bolding, A. 2008. Going with the flow: River basins as the natural units for water management? Water Policy 10(2): 121-138.
75. Weber, M. 1947. The theory of social and economic organisations. New York: Free Press.
76. Wegerich, K. 2008. Hydro-hegemony in the Amu Darya Basin. Water Policy 10(S2): 71-88.
77. Wells, L.C. 2003. The politics of water in the Middle East. Sentient Times, June 3. www.sentienttimes.com/03/june_july_03/waterT.html.
78. Williams, P. 2003a. Global (mis)governance of regional water relations. International Politics 40(1): 149-158.
79. Williams, P. 2003b. The security politics of enclosing transboundary river water resources. Paper given at the conference 'Resource politics and security in a global age', University of Sheffield, 26-28 June 2003.
80. Wittfogel, K.A. 1959 [1957]. Oriental despotism: A comparative study of total power. New Haven: Yale University Press.
81. World Commission on Dams. 2000. Dams and development. A new framework for decision-making. London: Earthscan.
82. Yavuz, E. 2008. Turkey, Iraq, Syria to initiate water talks. Today's Zaman, March 12.
83. Zawahri, N. 2006. Stabilising Iraq's water supply: What the Euphrates and Tigris rivers can learn from the Indus. Third World Quarterly 27(6): 1041-1058.
84. Zeitoun, M. and Warner, J. 2006 Hydro-hegemony: A framework for analysis of transboundary water conflicts. Water Policy 8(5): 435-460.
85. Zürcher, E.-J. 1998 [1993]. Turkey: A modern history. London: IB Tauris.