Language in Science Classrooms: An Analysis of Physics Teachers' Use of and Beliefs About Language

Research in Science Education

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 849-873

  Oyoo, Samuel Ouma ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Continuing professional development of physics teachers; Initial preparation of physics teachers; Language of instruction; Physics teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865825959     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11165-011-9228-3     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Abagi, J., Cleghorn, A., & Merritt, M. (1988). Language use in standard three: science instruction in urban and rural Kenyan schools. Kenya Journal of Education, 4(1), 118-145.
2. Abdi-Kadir, J., & Hardman, F. (2007). The discourse of whole class teaching: a comparative study of Kenyan and Nigerian Primary English lessons. Language and Education, 21(1), 1-15.
3. Asoko, H. (2000). Learning to teach science in primary schools. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 79-93). Buckingham: Open University Press.
4. Bali, S. K., Drenth, P. J. D., van der Flier, H., & Young, W. C. E. (1984). Contribution of aptitude tests to the prediction of school performance in Kenya: A longitudinal study. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
5. Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1995). Communication and learning Revisited: making meaning through talk. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers Heinemann.
6. Barnes, D., Britton, J., & Rosen, H. (1969). Language, the learner and the school. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
7. rd(New) edition. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.
8. Bauer, A., Brust, F., & Hubbert, J. (2002). Entrepreneurship: a case study in African enterprise growth-expanding private education in Kenya: Mary Okelo and Makini Schools. New York: Columbia Business School.
9. Bearne, E. (1999). Conclusion: language in use-from policy to practice. In E. Bearne (Ed.), Use of language across the secondary curriculum (pp. 234-269). London: Routledge.
10. Bleicher, R. E., Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (2003). Opportunities to talk in a high school chemistry classroom. Research in Science Education, 33(3), 319-339.
11. Brock-Utne, B., & Holmarsdottir, H. B. (2003). Language policies and practices-some preliminary results from a project in Tanzania and South Africa. In B. Brock-Utne, Z. Desai, & M. Qorro (Eds.), Language of Instruction in Tanzania and South Africa (LOITASA (pp. 80-101). Dar es Salaam: E & D Limited.
12. Bulman, L. (1988). Teaching language and study skills in secondary science. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
13. Cassels, J. R. T., & Johnstone, A. H. (1980). Understanding of non-technical words in science. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
14. Cassels, J. R. T., & Johnstone, A. H. (1985). Words that matter in science. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
15. Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
16. Cleghorn, A. (1992). Primary level science in Kenya: constructing meaning through English and indigenous languages. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3(4), 311-323.
17. Cleghorn, A., Merrit, M., & Abagi, J. O. (1989). Language policy and science instruction in Kenyan primary schools. Comparative Education Review, 33(1), 21-39.
18. Driver, R. (1989). Changing conceptions. In P. Adey, J. Bliss, J. Head, & M. Shayer (Eds.), Adolescent development and school science (pp. 79-99). Lewes: Falmer.
19. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. H. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
20. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.
21. Farell, M. P., & Ventura, F. (1998). Words and understanding in physics. Language and Education, 12(4), 243-54.
22. Fensham, P. J. (2004). Defining an identity: The evolution of science education as a field of research. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
23. Flanders, N. (1970). Analysing teaching behaviour. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
24. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2003). The Interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed., pp. 61-106). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
25. Gardner, P. L. (1971). Project SWNG-Scientific words: New Guinea. A Research Monograph. Melbourne: Faculty of Education, Monash University.
26. Gardner, P. L. (1972). 'Words in Science': An investigation of non-technical vocabulary difficulties amongst Form I, II, III and IV science students in Victoria. Melbourne: Australian Science Education Project.
27. Gardner, P. L. (1977a). Logical connectives in science: An investigation of difficulties in comprehending logical connectives in both scientific and everyday contexts amongst junior secondary school students in Victoria. Melbourne: A Research Monograph: Faculty of Education, Monash University.
28. Gardner, P. L. (1977b). Logical connectives in science: a summary of the findings. Research in Science Education, 7, 9-24.
29. George, J. (1999). Worldview analysis of knowledge in a rural village: implications for science education. Science Education, 83(1), 77-96.
30. Gibbons, P. (1998). Classroom talk and the learning of new registers in a second language. Language and Education, 12(2), 99-118.
31. Gyllenpalm, J., Wickman, P., & Holmgren, S. (2010). Teachers' language on scientific inquiry: methods of teaching or methods of inquiry? International Journal of Science Education, 32(9), 1151-1172.
32. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing in science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
33. Hand, B., Yore, L. D., Jagger, S., & Prain, V. (2010). Connecting research in science literacy and classroom practice: a review of science teaching journals in Australia, the UK and the United States, 1998-2008. Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 45-68.
34. Henderson, J., & Wellington, J. (1998). Lowering the language barrier in learning and teaching science. School Science Review, 79(288), 35-46.
35. Hodson, D. (1999). Going beyond cultural pluralism: science education for socio-political action. Science Education, 83(6), 775-796.
36. Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science: Language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values. Rotterdam: Sense.
37. Hodson, D., & Hodson, J. (1998). From constructivism to social constructivism: a Vygotskian perspective on teaching and learning science. School Science Review, 79(289), 33-41.
38. Högström, P., Ottander, C., & Benckert, S. (2010). Lab work and learning in secondary school chemistry: the importance of teacher and student interaction. Research in Science Education, 40, 505-523.
39. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
40. Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2003). Individual and sociocultural views on learning in science education. Science and Education, 12, 91-113.
41. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood: Abex.
42. Macintyre, C. (2000). The art of action research in the classroom. London: David Fulton Publishers.
43. Marshall, S., & Gilmour, M. (1991). Problematical words and concepts in physics education: a study of Papua New Guinean students' comprehension of non-technical words used in science. Physics Education, 25(6), 330-337.
44. Marshall, S., Gilmour, M., & Lewis, D. (1991). Words that matter in science and technology: a study of Papua New Guinean students' comprehension of non-technical words used in science and technology. Research in Science and Technological Education, 9(1), 5-16.
45. Matthews, M. R. (1998). Introductory comments on philosophy and constructivism in science education. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), Constructivism in science education (pp. 1-10). Dordretcht: Kluwer.
46. Meyer, J. P. (1993). The educational system of Kenya. Milwaukee: Educational Credentials Evaluators, Inc.
47. Miller, G. (1999). On knowing a word. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 1-19.
48. Miller, J. (2009). Teaching refugee learners with interrupted education in science: Vocabulary, literacy and pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 571-592.
49. Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2000). Analysing discourse in the science classroom. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 126-142). Buckingham: Open University.
50. Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
51. Murphy, G. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge: MIT.
52. Njeru, E., & Orodho, J. (2003). Access and participation in secondary school education in Kenya: emerging issues and policy implications. Policy Brief - Institute of Policy Analysis and Research, 9(6), 2.
53. Ogborn, J., Kress, G., Martins, I., & McGillicuddy, K. (1996). Explaining science in the classroom. Buckingham: Open University Press.
54. Oyoo, S. O. (2000). Understanding of Some Non-Technical Words in Science and Suggestions for Effective Use of Language in Science Classrooms. M. Ed (Science Education) dissertation; School of Education: University of Leeds, England, United Kingdom.
55. Oyoo, S. O. (2004). Effective teaching of science: The impact of physics teachers' classroom language. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Education: Monash University, Australia.
56. Oyoo, S. O. (2007). Rethinking proficiency in the language of instruction (English) as a factor in the difficulty of school science. The International Journal of Learning, 14(4), 231-242.
57. Oyoo, S. O. (2008). Attention to female students' 'lower' outcomes in science as social construction of a negative perception of their ability in school science. The International Journal of Learning, 15(11), 271-286.
58. Oyoo, S. O. (2009). Beyond general proficiency in language of instruction: Towards the appropriate perspective on language for effective learning in African science classrooms. In M. Shafer and C. MacNamara (Eds.), Proceedings (Refereed) of the 17th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (SAARMSTE 2009), 19-22 January 2009, Rhodes University, Republic of South Africa. Book Version, Vol. 1 (Long Papers, pp. 197-212); ISBN 978-92-990043-6-4; CD Version ISBN # 978-92-990043-6-4.
59. Oyoo, S. O. (2010a). Attracting more girls to school physics in Kenya: findings in a 'distance' study. The International Journal of Learning, 17(10), 1-21.
60. Oyoo, S. O. (2010b). Science teacher effectiveness as a condition for successful science education in Africa: a focus on Kenya. The International Journal of Learning, 17(9), 469-484.
61. Pickersgill, S., & Lock, R. (1991). Student understanding of selected non-technical words in science. Research in Science and Technological Education, 9(1), 71-79.
62. Porter, A. C. (2002). Presidential address-Measuring the content of instruction: uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 3-14.
63. Porter, A. C., Floden, R., Freeman, D., Schmidt, W., & Schwille, J. (1998). Content determinants in elementary school mathematics. In D. A. Grouws & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective teaching (pp. 96-113). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
64. Prophet, B., & Towse, P. (1999). Pupils' understanding of some non-technical words in science. School Science Review, 81(295), 79-86.
65. Republic of Kenya. (1999). Totally Integrated Quality Education and Training (TIQET): Report of the commission of inquiry into the education system of Kenya-learning and moving together into the 21st century and the third millennium. Nairobi: Government Printer.
66. Rodrigues, S., & Thompson, I. (2001). Cohesion in science lesson discourse: clarity, relevance and sufficient information. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 929-940.
67. Schwille, J. R., Porter, A. C., Belli, G., Floden, R. E., Freeman, D. J., Knappen, L. B., et al. (1983). Teachers as policy brokers in the content of elementary school mathematics. In L. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook on teaching and policy analysis (pp. 370-391). New York: Longman.
68. Scott, P. H. (1998). Teacher talk and meaning making in science classrooms: a Vygotskian analysis and review. Studies in Science Education, 32, 45-80.
69. Sutton, C. (1992). Words, science and learning. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
70. Sutton, C. (1998). Science as conversation: Come and see my air pump. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way? (pp. 174-191). London: Routledge.
71. Tharp, R., & Gallimore, R. (1988). A theory of teaching as assisted performance. In R. Tharp & R. Gallimore (Eds.), Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning and schooling in social context (Chapter 3, pp. 27-43). New York: Cambridge University Press.
72. Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge and co-participation in science classrooms. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 215-234). Dordrecht: Kluwer Educational Publishers.
73. Tytler, R. (2003). A window for a purpose: developing a framework for describing effective science teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 33, 273-298.
74. Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT.
75. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
76. Wallen, N. E., & Fraenkel, J. R. (2001). Educational research: A guide to the process (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
77. Wanzare, Z. O. (2007). The transition process: The early years of being a teacher. In T. Townseed & R. Bates (Eds.), Handbook of teacher education: Globalisation, standards and professionalism in times of change (pp. 343-364). Dordrecht: Springer.
78. Wellington, J. (1994). Language in science education. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Secondary science: Contemporary issues and practical approaches (pp. 168-190). London: Routledge.
79. Wickman, P. -O., & Östman, L. (2002). Learning as a discourse change: a sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86(5), 604-623.
80. Wilson, J. (1999). Using words about thinking: content analyses of chemistry teachers' classroom talk. International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1067-1084.
81. Yore, L. D., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: language and science literacy-empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 291-314.
82. Yore, L., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689-727.
83. Yussuffu, A. (1990). Using the Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE) for university admission abroad. Nairobi: Kenya National Examinations Council.