Epigenetic changes associated with oocyte aging

Science China Life Sciences

Volumn 55, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 670-676

  Liang, XingWei ^a,b   Ma, JunYu ^a   Schatten, Heide ^c   Sun, QingYuan ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (China)

^b Chungbuk National University   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

advanced maternal age; DNA methylation; fertility; histone modification; postovulatory oocyte aging

Indexed keywords

HISTONE;

ACETYLATION; AGING; ANIMAL; DNA METHYLATION; FEMALE; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; HUMAN; MATERNAL AGE; METABOLISM; METHYLATION; OOCYTE; PATHOLOGY; REVIEW;

ACETYLATION; AGING; ANIMALS; DNA METHYLATION; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; HISTONES; HUMANS; MATERNAL AGE; METHYLATION; OOCYTES;

EID: 84865809311     PISSN: 16747305     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-012-4354-3     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Jones K T. Meiosis in oocytes: predisposition to aneuploidy and its increased incidence with age. Hum Reprod Update, 2008, 14: 143-158.
2. Wang Z B, Schatten H, Sun Q Y. Why is chromosome segregation error in oocytes increased with maternal aging? Physiology (Bethesda), 2011, 26: 314-325.
3. Wang Q, Sun Q Y. Evaluation of oocyte quality: morphological, cellular and molecular predictors. Reprod Fertil Dev, 2007, 19: 1-12.
4. Austin C R. In: Whittaher J R, ed. Concepts of Development. Sinauer Associates Inc., 1974.
5. Kikuchi K, Naito K, Noguchi J, et al. Maturation/M-phase promoting factor: a regulator of aging in porcine oocytes. Biol Reprod, 2000, 63: 715-722.
6. Miao Y L, Kikuchi K, Sun Q Y, et al. Oocyte aging: cellular and molecular changes, developmental potential and reversal possibility. Hum Reprod Update, 2009, 15: 573-585.
7. Tatone C, Amicarelli F, Carbone M C, et al. Cellular and molecular aspects of ovarian follicle aging. Hum Reprod Update, 2008, 14: 131-142.
8. Ma J Y, Liang X W, Schatten H, et al. Active DNA demethylation in mammalian preimplantation embryos: new insights and new perspectives. Mol Hum Reprod, 2012, 18: 333-340.
9. Reik W, Dean W, Walter J. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science, 2001, 293: 1089-1093.
10. Verona R I, Mann M R, Bartolomei M S. Genomic imprinting: intricacies of epigenetic regulation in clusters. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 2003, 19: 237-259.
11. Bartolomei M S, Ferguson-Smith A C. Mammalian genomic imprinting. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2011, 3: a002592.
12. Reik W. Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature, 2007, 447: 425-432.
13. Hiura H, Obata Y, Komiyama J, et al. Oocyte growth-dependent progression of maternal imprinting in mice. Genes Cells, 2006, 11: 353-361.
14. La Salle S, Mertineit C, Taketo T, et al. Windows for sex-specific methylation marked by DNA methyltransferase expression profiles in mouse germ cells. Dev Biol, 2004, 268: 403-415.
15. Lucifero D, La Salle S, Bourc'his D, et al. Coordinate regulation of DNA methyltransferase expression during oogenesis. BMC Dev Biol, 2007, 7: 36.
16. Lucifero D, Mann M R, Bartolomei M S, et al. Gene-specific timing and epigenetic memory in oocyte imprinting. Hum Mol Genet, 2004, 13: 839-849.
17. Bestor T H. The DNA methyltransferases of mammals. Hum Mol Genet, 2000, 9: 2395-2402.
18. Branco M R, Oda M, Reik W. Safeguarding parental identity: Dnmt1 maintains imprints during epigenetic reprogramming in early embryogenesis. Genes Dev, 2008, 22: 1567-1571.
19. Allfrey V G, Faulkner R, Mirsky A E. Acetylation and methylation of histones and their possible role in the regulation of RNA synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1964, 51: 786-794.
20. Gutierrez R M, Hnilica L S. Tissue specificity of histone phosphorylation. Science, 1967, 157: 1324-1325.
21. Huletsky A, Niedergang C, Frechette A, et al. Sequential ADP-ribosylation pattern of nucleosomal histones. ADP-ribosylation of nucleosomal histones. Eur J Biochem, 1985, 146: 277-285.
22. Nathan D, Ingvarsdottir K, Sterner D E, et al. Histone sumoylation is a negative regulator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and shows dynamic interplay with positive-acting histone modifications. Genes Dev, 2006, 20: 966-976.
23. Koprinarova M A, Russev G C. Dynamics of histone H4 acetylation during the cell cycle. Cell Cycle, 2008, 7: 414-416.
24. Rada-Iglesias A, Enroth S, Andersson R, et al. Histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation in adult differentiated colon associated to cancer DNA hypermethylation. Epigenetics, 2009, 4: 107-113.
25. Xu D, Bai J, Duan Q, et al. Covalent modifications of histones during mitosis and meiosis. Cell Cycle, 2009, 8: 3688-3694.
26. Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell, 2007, 128: 693-705.
27. Strahl B D, Allis C D. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature, 2000, 403: 41-45.
28. Wang N, Tilly J L. Epigenetic status determines germ cell meiotic commitment in embryonic and postnatal mammalian gonads. Cell Cycle, 2010, 9: 339-349.
29. Gu L, Wang Q, Sun Q Y. Histone modifications during mammalian oocyte maturation: dynamics, regulation and functions. Cell Cycle, 2010, 9: 1942-1950.
30. Jiang G J, Wang K, Miao D Q, et al. Protein profile changes during porcine oocyte aging and effects of caffeine on protein expression patterns. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6: e28996.
31. Yue M X, Fu X W, Zhou G B, et al. Abnormal DNA methylation in oocytes could be associated with a decrease in reproductive potential in old mice. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2012, 29: 643-650.
32. Lopes F L, Fortier A L, Darricarrere N, et al. Reproductive and epigenetic outcomes associated with aging mouse oocytes. Hum Mol Genet, 2009, 18: 2032-2044.
33. Holinka C F, Tseng Y C, Finch C E. Reproductive aging in C57BL/6J mice: plasma progesterone, viable embryos and resorption frequency throughout pregnancy. Biol Reprod, 1979, 20: 1201-1211.
34. Manosalva I, Gonzalez A. Aging changes the chromatin configuration and histone methylation of mouse oocytes at germinal vesicle stage. Theriogenology, 2010, 74: 1539-1547.
35. Ooga M, Inoue A, Kageyama S, et al. Changes in H3K79 methylation during preimplantation development in mice. Biol Reprod, 2008, 78: 413-424.
36. Park K E, Magnani L, Cabot R A. Differential remodeling of mono- and trimethylated H3K27 during porcine embryo development. Mol Reprod Dev, 2009, 76: 1033-1042.
37. Hou J, Liu L, Zhang J, et al. Epigenetic modification of histone 3 at lysine 9 in sheep zygotes and its relationship with DNA methylation. BMC Dev Biol, 2008, 8: 60.
38. Racedo S E, Wrenzycki C, Lepikhov K, et al. Epigenetic modifications and related mRNA expression during bovine oocyte in vitro maturation. Reprod Fertil Dev, 2009, 21: 738-748.
39. Qiao J, Chen Y, Yan L Y, et al. Changes in histone methylation during human oocyte maturation and IVF-or ICSI-derived embryo development. Fertil Steril, 2010, 93: 1628-1636.
40. Akiyama T, Nagata M, Aoki F. Inadequate histone deacetylation during oocyte meiosis causes aneuploidy and embryo death in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006, 103: 7339-7344.
41. Manosalva I, Gonzalez A. Aging alters histone H4 acetylation and CDC2A in mouse germinal vesicle stage oocytes. Biol Reprod, 2009, 81: 1164-1171.
42. van den Berg I M, Eleveld C, van der Hoeven M, et al. Defective deacetylation of histone 4 K12 in human oocytes is associated with advanced maternal age and chromosome misalignment. Hum Reprod, 2011, 26: 1181-1190.
43. Lucifero D, Mertineit C, Clarke H J, et al. Methylation dynamics of imprinted genes in mouse germ cells. Genomics, 2002, 79: 530-538.
44. Li J Y, Lees-Murdock D J, Xu G L, et al. Timing of establishment of paternal methylation imprints in the mouse. Genomics, 2004, 84: 952-960.
45. Liang X W, Zhu J Q, Miao Y L, et al. Loss of methylation imprint of SNRPN in postovulatory aging mouse oocyte. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2008, 371: 16-21.
46. Imamura T, Kerjean A, Heams T, et al. Dynamic CpG and non-CpG methylation of the Peg1/Mest gene in the mouse oocyte and preimplantation embryo. J Biol Chem, 2005, 280: 20171-20175.
47. Tarin J J, Perez-Albala S, Aguilar A, et al. Long-term effects of postovulatory aging of mouse oocytes on offspring: a two-generational study. Biol Reprod, 1999, 61: 1347-1355.
48. Tarin J J, Perez-Albala S, Perez-Hoyos S, et al. Postovulatory aging of oocytes decreases reproductive fitness and longevity of offspring. Biol Reprod, 2002, 66: 495-499.
49. Liang X W, Ge Z J, Guo L, et al. Effect of postovulatory oocyte aging on DNA methylation imprinting acquisition in offspring oocytes. Fertil Steril, 2011, 96: 1479-1484.
50. Huang J C, Yan L Y, Lei Z L, et al. Changes in histone acetylation during postovulatory aging of mouse oocyte. Biol Reprod, 2007, 77: 666-670.
51. Liu N, Wu Y G, Lan G C, et al. Pyruvate prevents aging of mouse oocytes. Reproduction, 2009, 138: 223-234.
52. Cui M S, Wang X L, Tang D W, et al. Acetylation of H4K12 in porcine oocytes during in vitro aging: potential role of ooplasmic reactive oxygen species. Theriogenology, 2011, 75: 638-646.
53. Yoshida M, Kijima M, Akita M, et al. Potent and specific inhibition of mammalian histone deacetylase both in vivo and in vitro by trichostatin A. J Biol Chem, 1990, 265: 17174-17179.
54. De La Fuente R, Viveiros M M, Wigglesworth K, et al. ATRX, a member of the SNF2 family of helicase/ATPases, is required for chromosome alignment and meiotic spindle organization in metaphase II stage mouse oocytes. Dev Biol, 2004, 272: 1-14.
55. Wang Q, Yin S, Ai J S, et al. Histone deacetylation is required for orderly meiosis. Cell Cycle, 2006, 5: 766-774.
56. Pan H, Ma P, Zhu W, et al. Age-associated increase in aneuploidy and changes in gene expression in mouse eggs. Dev Biol, 2008, 316: 397-407.
57. Hamatani T, Falco G, Carter M G, et al. Age-associated alteration of gene expression patterns in mouse oocytes. Hum Mol Genet, 2004, 13: 2263-2278.
58. Ratnam S, Mertineit C, Ding F, et al. Dynamics of Dnmt1 methyltransferase expression and intracellular localization during oogenesis and preimplantation development. Dev Biol, 2002, 245: 304-314.
59. Hirasawa R, Chiba H, Kaneda M, et al. Maternal and zygotic Dnmt1 are necessary and sufficient for the maintenance of DNA methylation imprints during preimplantation development. Genes Dev, 2008, 22: 1607-1616.
60. Kurihara Y, Kawamura Y, Uchijima Y, et al. Maintenance of genomic methylation patterns during preimplantation development requires the somatic form of DNA methyltransferase 1. Dev Biol, 2008, 313: 335-346.
61. Mohan K N, Ding F, Chaillet J R. Distinct roles of DMAP1 in mouse development. Mol Cell Biol, 2011, 31: 1861-1869.
62. Zhang L, Lu D Y, Ma W Y, et al. Age-related changes in the localization of DNA methyltransferases during meiotic maturation in mouse oocytes. Fertil Steril, 2011, 95: 1531-1534.
63. Lees-Murdock D J, Shovlin T C, Gardiner T, et al. DNA methyltransferase expression in the mouse germ line during periods of de novo methylation. Dev Dyn, 2005, 232: 992-1002.
64. Wood A J, Oakey R J. Genomic imprinting in mammals: emerging themes and established theories. PLoS Genet, 2006, 2: e147.
65. Suo L, Meng Q G, Pei Y, et al. Changes in acetylation on lysine 12 of histone H4 (acH4K12) of murine oocytes during maternal aging may affect fertilization and subsequent embryo development. Fertil Steril, 2010, 93: 945-951.
66. Yu J N, Wang M, Wang D Q, et al. Chromosome changes of aged oocytes after ovulation. Yi Chuan, 2007, 29: 225-229.