Bourdieu, International Relations, and European security

Theory and Society

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 451-478

  Berling, Trine Villumsen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Doxic battles; NATO; Theory practice; Think tanks

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865600346     PISSN: 03042421     EISSN: 15737853     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11186-012-9175-7     Document Type: Article

References (133)

1. Adler, E. (1997a). Imagined (security) communities: cognitive regions in international relations. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 26(2), 249-278.
2. Adler, E. (1997b). Seizing the middle ground: constructivism in world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 3(3), 319-363.
3. Adler, E. (2002). Constructivism and international relations. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. A. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (pp. 95-118). London: Sage.
4. Adler, E., & Barnett, M. (Eds.). (1998). Security communities. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Adler-Nissen, R. (2009). The diplomacy of opting Out: a Bourdieudian approach to national integration strategies. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(3), 663-684.
6. Adler-Nissen, R. (2011). Opting out of an ever closer union: the integration doxa and the management of sovereignty. West European Politics, 34(5), 1092-1113.
7. Art, R. J. (1996). American foreign policy and the fungibility of force. Security Studies, 5(4), 7-42.
8. Art, R. J. (1999). Force and fungibility reconsidered. Security Studies, 8(4), 183-189.
9. Ashley, R. K. (1984). The poverty of neo-realism. International Organization, 38(2), 225-286.
10. Ashley, R. K. (1987). The geopolitics of geopolitical space: toward a critical social theory of International relations. Alternatives, 12(14), 403-434.
11. Ashley, R. K. (1988). Untying the sovereign state: a double reading of the Anarchy Problematique. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17(2), 227-262.
12. Ashley, R. K. (1989). Imposing international purpose: Notes on a problematic of governance. In E. O. Czempiel & J. N. Rosenau (Eds.), Global changes & theoretical challenges. Approaches to world politics for the 1990s (pp. 251-290). Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.
13. Baldwin, D. A. (1989). Paradoxes of power. New York, N. Y.: Basil Blackwell.
14. Baldwin, D. A. (1999). Force, fungibility, and influence. Security Studies, 8(4), 173-183.
15. Baldwin, D. A. (2002). Power and international relations. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. A. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (pp. 177-191). London & Thousand Oaks: Sage.
16. Behnke, A. (2000). Inscriptions of Imperial Order: NATO's Mediterranean Initiative. The International Journal of Peace Studies, 5(1), available at http://www. gmu. edu/academic/ijps/vol5_1/behnke. htm (accessed 30 August 2007).
17. Berling, T. V. (2011). Science and Securitization. Objectivation, the authority of the speaker, and mobilization of scientific facts. Security Dialogue, 42, 4-5.
18. Berling, T. V. (2012). Knowledges. In R. Adler-Nissen (Ed.), Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR. London: Routledge.
19. Berling, T. V. (forthcoming). The International Political Sociology of Security: Rethinking Theory and Practice (New International Relatiions). London: Routledge.
20. Bigo, D. (2000). Liaison officers in Europe: new officers in the European security field. In J. Sheptycki (Ed.), Issues in transnational policing (pp. 67-99). London: Routledge.
21. Bigo, D. (2002). Security and immigration: toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 27(1), 63-92.
22. Bigo, D. (2005). Frontier controls in the European union: Who is in control? In D. Bigo & E. Guild (Eds.), Controlling frontiers: Free movement into and within europe (pp. 49-99). Aldershot: Ashgate.
23. Bigo, D. (2006). Globalized-in-security: The Field and the Ban-opticon. In J. Solomon, & N. Sakai (Eds.), Translation, Biopolitics and Colonial Difference (vol. 4 ed., pp. 109-157). Hong Kong: Traces: a multilingual series of cultural Theory.
24. Bigo, D., & Guild, E. (2005). Policing at a distance: Schengen visa policies. In D. Bigo & E. Guild (Eds.), Controlling frontiers: free movement into and within Europe (pp. 233-263). Aldershot: Ashgate.
25. Bigo, D., & Walker, R. B. J. (2007). Political sociology and the problem of the International. Millenium - Journal of International Studies, 35(3), 725-739.
26. Bilski, A. (1995). Islamic Fundamentalism. Maclean's.
27. Bourdieu, P. (1971). Intellectual field and creative project. In M. F. D. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education (pp. 166-188). London: Collier-Macmillian.
28. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Bourdieu, P. (1986 [1979]). Dinstinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. New York & London: Routledge.
30. Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
31. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
32. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production, or: the economic world reversed. In R. Johnson (Ed.), The field of cultural production. Essays on Art and literature (pp. 29-74). Cambridge: Polity Press.
33. Bourdieu, P. (1998). The state nobility. Cambridge & Oxford: Polity Press.
34. Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
35. Bourdieu, P. (2005). The social structures of the economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
36. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
37. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (2004 [1996]). Refleksiv sociologi - mål og midler. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Publishers.
38. Breitenbauch, H. Ø. (2008). Cartesian Limbo. A Formal Approach to the Study of Social Sciences: International Relations in France. Copenhagen, PhD Series 2008/3: University of Copenhagen.
39. Büger, C., & Gadinger, F. (2007). Reassembling and dissecting: International relations practice from a science studies perspective. International Studies Perspectives, 8(1), 90-110.
40. Büger, C., & Villumsen, T. (2007). Beyond the Gap: relevance, fields of practice and the securitizing consequences of (democratic peace) research. Journal of International Relations and Development, 10(4), 417-448. doi: 10. 1057/palgrave. jird. 1800136.
41. Buzan, B. (1983). People, states and fear: The national security problem in international relations. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
42. Buzan, B., & Hansen, L. (2009). The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Buzan, B., de Wilde, J., & Wæver, O. (1998). Security: a New framework for analysis. Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner.
44. Calhoun, C. (2003). Pierre Bourdieu. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to major classical social theorists (pp. 274-309). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
45. Carvalho-Rodrigues, F. (2001). NATO's science programmes: origins and influence. Technology in Society, 23(3), 375-381.
46. Chalmers, M. (1990). Beyond the alliance system. World Policy Journal, 7(2), 215-250.
47. Ciuta, F. (2002). The end(s) of NATO: security, strategic option and narrative transformation. Contemporary Security Policy, 23(1), 35-62.
48. Cox, M. (2005). Beyond the West: terrors in Transatlantia. European Journal of International Relations, 11(2), 203-233.
49. Cox, M. (2006). Let's Argue about the west: reply to Vincent Pouliot. European Journal of International Relations, 12(1), 129-134.
50. Crossley, N. (2004). On Systematically Distorted Communication. Bourdieu and the Socioanalysis of Publics. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 88-112.
51. De Santis, H. (1991). The Graying of NATO. The Washington Quarterly, 14(autumn), 51-65.
52. Dezalay, Y., & Garth, B. G. (2002). The Internationalization of Palace Wars. Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
53. Dezalay, Y., & Garth, B. G. (2006). From the cold war to Kosovo: The rise and renewal of the field of international human rights. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 231-255.
54. Droziak, W. (1995). NATO turns attention to Islamic Extremists. International Herald Tribune.
55. Duffield, J. S. (1994). NATO's Functions after the cold war. Political Science Quarterly, 109(5), 763-787.
56. Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for relational sociology. The American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281-317.
57. Emirbayer, M., & Johnson, V. (2008). Bourdieu and organizational analysis. Theory and Society, 37(1), 1-44.
58. Eriksson, J., & Sundelius, B. (2005). Molding minds that form policy: how to make research useful. International Studies Perspectives, 6(1), 51-72.
59. Everts, S. (2004). An asset but not a model: Turkey, the EU and the Wider Middle East. London: Centre for European Reform Briefing Note.
60. Fierke, K. M., & Wiener, A. (1999). Constructing Institutional interests: EU and NATO enlargement. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(5), 721-742.
61. Fisher, D. (1990). Homo academicus. Journal of Higher Education, 61(5), 581-591.
62. Fisk, R. (1999). The West's Fear of Islam is no Excuse for Racism. The Independent, 3 November, 1-3.
63. Garfield, E. (1987). NATO's Strategy for Science. The Scientist, 1(16), 9.
64. George, A. L. (1993). Bridging the Gap: Theory and practice in foreign policy. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Institute of Peace Press.
65. Go, J. (2008). Global fields and imperial forms: Field theory and the British and American empires. Sociological Theory, 26(3), 201-229.
66. Guilhot, N. (2005). The democracy makers: Human rights and International order. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
67. Guzzini, S. (1994). Power Analysis as a Critique of Power Politics: Understanding Power and Governance in the Second Gulf War. Florence: European University Institute: Ph. D. thesis.
68. Guzzini, S. (2000). A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 6(2), 147-182.
69. Guzzini, S. (2003). 'Self-fulfilling geopolitics'? Or: the social production of foreign policy expertise in Europe. DIIS Working Paper, 23, 1-22.
70. Guzzini, S. (2005). The concept of power: a constructivist analysis. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 495-521.
71. Guzzini, S., & Jung, D. (Eds.). (2004). Contemporary security analysis and Copenhagen peace research. New York: Routledge.
72. Hansen, L. (1995). NATO's new discourse. In B. Hansen (Ed.), European Security - 2000 (pp. 117-135). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Political Studies Press.
73. Hansen, L. (2006). Security as practice. Discourse analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge.
74. Harmel, R. (1967). Text of the Report of the Committee of Three on Non-Military Cooperation in NATO. The Future Tasks of the Alliance. The Harmel Report. Brussels: NATO, 13-14 December 1967.
75. Hassner, P. (1990). europe beyond partition and unity: disintegration or reconstitution? International Affairs, 66(3), 461-475.
76. Hopf, T. (2002). Social construction of international politics: identities & foreign policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
77. Huntington, S. P. (1993). The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22-49.
78. Huysmans, J. (2002). Shape-shifting NATO: Humanitarian Action and the Kosovo Refugee Crisis. Review of International Studies, 28(3), 599-618.
79. Huysmans, J. (2006). The Politics of Insecurity. Fear, migration and asylum in the EU. London & New York: Routledge.
80. Johnson, R. (Ed.). (1993). The field of cultural production. essays on art and literature. Cambridge: Polity.
81. Kauppi, N. (2003). Bourdieu's political sociology and the politics of European integration. Theory and Society, 32, 775-789.
82. Keohane, R. O. (1988). International Institutions: two approaches, ISA presidential address. International Studies Quarterly, 32(4), 379-396.
83. Klein, B. S. (1994). Strategic studies and world order: the global politics of deterrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Krais, B. (1994). I mellemtiden har jeg lært alle den sociologiske forståelses sygdomme at kende (Interview with Pierre Bourdieu). In S. Callewaert, M. Munk, M. Nørholm, & K. A. Petersen (Eds.), Pierre Bourdieu. Centrale tekster inden for sociologi og kulturteori (pp. 111-128). Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.
85. Krause, K., & Williams, M. C. (1997). Critical security studies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
86. Kruzel, J. (1994). More a chasm than a gap, but do scholars want to bridge it? Mershon International Studies Review, 38, 179-181.
87. Leander, A. (2005). The market for force and public security: destabilizing consequences of private military companies. Journal of Peace Research, 42(5), 605-622.
88. Leander, A. (2006). The 'Realpolitik of Reason': Thinking International Relations through Fields, Habitus and Practice. Paper Presented at the International Studies Association Annual Convention, San Diego 22-25 March.
89. Leander, A. (2008). Thinking Tools. In A. Klotz & D. prakash (Eds.), Qualitative methods in International relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.
90. Leonard, M. (2005). Why Europe will run the 21st century. Fourth Estate: London & New York.
91. McCourt, D. M. (2010). Rethinking Britain's Role in the World for a New Decade. The Limits of Discursive Therapy and the Promise of Field Theory. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Available online at http://onlinelibrary. wiley. com/doi/10. 1111/j. 1467-856X. 2010. 00429. x/full, accessed March 4 2011.
92. Mearsheimer, J. J. (1990). Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security, 15(1), 5-56.
93. Myles, J. F. (2004). From doxa to experience. issues in Bourdieu's adoption of Husserlian Phenomenology. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(2), 91-107.
94. NATO (1991). The Alliance's Strategic Concept. Agreed by the Heads of State and Government. Rome, Italy: North Atlantic Council, 8 November 1991.
95. Neumann, I. B. (1999). The Uses of the Other. 'The East' in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
96. Neumann, I. B. (2002). Returning practice to the linguistic turn: The case of diplomacy. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 31(3), 627-653.
97. Nierenberg, W. A. (2001). NATO science programmes: origins and influence. Technology in Society, 23(3), 361-374.
98. Pels, D. (1995). Knowledge politics and anti-politics: toward a critical appraisal of Bourdieu's concept of intellectual autonomy. Theory and Society, 24(1), 79-104.
99. Pop, L. (2007). Time & crisis. framing succes & failure in Romania's post-communist transformations. Review of International Studies, 33(3), 395-413.
100. Pouliot, V. (2004). Toward a Bourdieusian Constructivism in IR: Outline of a theory of practice of security communities. Paper presented at the Paper presented to the Fifth pan-European Conference, Standing Group on International Relations, 9-11 September, 2004, The Hague, Netherlands,.
101. Pouliot, V. (2006). The Alive and Well transatlantic security community: a theoretical reply to Michael Cox. European Journal of International Relations, 12(1), 119-127.
102. Pouliot, V. (2008). The logic of Practicality: a theory of practice of security communities. International Organization, 62(2), 257-288.
103. Pouliot, V. (2010). International Security in Practice: the Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy (Cambridge studies in international relations, Vol. 113). Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
104. Rasmussen, M. V. (2003). The west, civil society and the construction of peace. Palgrave: Macmillan.
105. Ray, A. N. (1997). The Enlargement of NATO. Paper presented at the Conference on 'Central and Eastern Europe and Euro-Atlantic Security', April 24-26, 1997, Slovenia, 1997.
106. Risse-Kappen, T. (1994). Ideas do no float freely. Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures, and the End of the Cold War. International Organization, 48(2), 5-53.
107. Risse-Kappen, T. (1996). Collective Identity in a democratic community: the case of NATO. In P. J. Katzenstein (Ed.), The culture of national security - norms and identity in World Politics (pp. 357-400). New York: Columbia University Press.
108. Sagan, S. D., & Waltz, K. N. (1995). The spread of nuclear weapons. New York: W. W. Norton.
109. Schatzki, T. R., Cetina, K. K., Savigny, E. V., & al., e. (Eds). (2001). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London & New York: Routledge.
110. Schimmelfenig, F. (1998). NATO enlargement: a constructivist explanation. Security Studies, 8(2), 198-234.
111. Schinkel, W. (2003). Pierre Bourdieu's Political Turn? Theory. Culture & Society, 20(6), 69-93.
112. Smith, S. (2004). Singing our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11. International Studies Quarterly, 48(3), 499-515.
113. Solana, J. (1997). NATO Beyond Enlargement. London: Remarks by the Secretary General of NATO to the UK Atlantic Council. November 19, 1997.
114. Solana, J. (1999a). An Alliance Fit for the 21st Century. NATO Review, 3(47), 3-4.
115. Solana, J. (1999b). Growing the alliance. www. economist. com, 13 March 1999: The Economist.
116. Swartz, D. L. (1997). Culture and Power. The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
117. Swartz, D. L. (2008). Bringing Bourdieu's master concepts into organizational analysis. Theory and Society, 37(1), 45-52.
118. Toews, J. E. (1987). Intellectual history after the linguistic turn: the autonomy of meaning and the Irreducibility of experience. The American Historical Review, 92(4), 879-907.
119. Villumsen, T. (2008). Theory as practice and capital NATO in a Bourdieusian field of security in Europe towards a sociological approach to IR (Ph. d.-serien). Copenhagen, PhD Series 2008/4: University of Copenhagen.
120. Wacquant, L. J. D. (1998). Foreword. In P. Bourdieu (Ed.), The State Nobility (pp. ix-xxii). Cambridge & Oxford: Polity Press.
121. Wæver, O., & Buzan, B. (2007). After the return to theory: the past, present, and future of security studies. In A. Collins (Ed.), Contemporary Security Studies (pp. 383-402). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
122. Walker, R. B. J. (1993). Inside/outside: International relations as political theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
123. Walt, S. M. (1987). The origins of alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
124. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: Random House.
125. Waltz, K. N. (1981). The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More may be better. Adelphi Paper, 171.
126. Waltz, K. N. (1993). The emerging structure of international politics. International Security, 18(2), 44-79.
127. Waltz, K. N. (2000). NATO expansion: a realist's view. Contemporary Security Policy, 21(2), 23-38.
128. Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391-425.
129. Williams, M. C. (1997). The Institutions of Security: Elements of a Theory of Security. Cooperation and Conflict, 32(3), 287-307.
130. Williams, M. C. (2001). The Discipline of the Democratic peace: Kant, liberalism and the social construction of security communities. Cooperation and Conflict, 7(4), 525-533.
131. Williams, M. C. (2007). Culture and security. Symbolic power and the politics of international security. London & New York: Routledge.
132. Williams, M. C., & Neumann, I. B. (2000). From alliance to security community: NATO, Russia, and the power of identity. Millennium, 29(2), 357-387.
133. Zehfuss, M. (2001). Constructivism and identity: a dangerous liaison. European Journal of International Relations, 7(3), 315-348.