Knowledges

Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 59-77

  Berling, Trine Villumsen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872084556     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203102282     Document Type: Chapter

References (94)

1. Adler, E. (1992) ‘The Emergence of Cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the International Evolution of the Idea of Nuclear Arms Control’. International Organization, 46(1), 101–145.
2. A dler, E. (1997) ‘Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics’. European Journal of International Relations, 3(3), 319–363.
3. A shley, R. K. (1987) ‘The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Relations’. Alternatives, 12(14), 403–434.
4. A shley, R. K. (1988) ‘Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17(2), 227–262.
5. B artelson, J. (1995) The Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. B erling, T. V. (2011) ‘Science and Securitization. Objectivation, the Authority of the Speaker, and Mobilization of Scientifi c Facts’. Security Dialogue, 42 (4–5): 385–397.
7. Berlin g, T. V. (forthcoming) The International Political Sociology of Security: Rethinking Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
8. Bigo D. (2000) Liaison Offi cers in Europe: New Offi cers in the European Security Field. In J. Sheptycki (ed.), Issues in Transnational Policing (pp. 67–99). London: Routledge.
9. Bigo D. (2002) ‘Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease’. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 27(1), 63–92.
10. Booth K. (1997) ‘Discussion: A Reply to Wallace’. Review of International Studies, 23(3), 371–377.
11. Bourdi eu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Bourdi eu, P. (1988) Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
13. Bourdi eu, P. (1993) The Field of Cultural Production, or: The Economic World Reversed. In R. Johnson (ed.), The Field of Cultural Production. Essays on Art and Literature (pp. 29–74). Cambridge: Polity Press.
14. Bourdi eu, P. (1998) The State Nobility. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15. Bourdi eu, P. (2000) Pascalian Meditations. London: Stanford University Press.
16. Bourdi eu, P. (2004) Science of Science and Reflexivity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17. Büger C. and Villumsen T. (2007) ‘Beyond the Gap: Relevance, Fields of Practice and the Securitizing Consequences of (Democratic Peace) Research’. Journal of International Relations and Development, 10(4), 417–448.
18. Buzan B., de Wilde, J., and Wæver O. (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
19. Calhoun C., Gerteis, J., Moody, J., Pfaff, S., Virk, I. et al. (eds.). (2002) Contemporary Sociological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
20. Campbell D. (1992) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Policy of Identity. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
21. Cox R. W. (1981) ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126–155.
22. Der Deri an, J. (1992) Antidiplomacy. Spies, Terror, Speed, and War. Oxford: Blackwell.
23. Eriksson J. (1999), ‘Observers or Advocates?: On the Political Role of Security Analysts’. Cooperation and Confl ict, 34(3): 311–330.
24. Eriksson J. and Sundelius, B. (2005) ‘Molding Minds that Form Policy: How to Make Research Useful’. International Studies Perspectives, 6(1), 51–72.
25. Fisher D. (1990) ‘Homo Academicus’. Journal of Higher Education, 61(5), 581–591.
26. Friedric hs, J. and Kratochwil, F. (2009) ‘On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology’. International Organization, 63(4), 701–731.
27. Galvin J. C. (1994) ‘Breaking Through and Being Heard’. Mershon International Studies Review, 38, 173–174.
28. Garfi eld, E. (1987) ‘NATO’s Strategy for Science’. The Scientist, 1(16, June 29), 246–248.
29. George A. L. (1993) Bridging the Gap: Theory and Practice in Foreign Policy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
30. George A. L. (1994) ‘Some Guides to Bridging the Gap’. Mershon International Studies Review, 39, 171–172.
31. George J. (1994) Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re) Introduction to International Relations. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
32. Giddens A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
33. Goldmann K. (1999) ‘Issues Not Labels, Please!’ Cooperation and Confl ict, 34(3), 331–333.
34. Gray C. S. (1992) ‘New Directions for Strategic Studies? How Can Theory Help Practice?’. Security Studies, 1(4), 611–635.
35. Guzzini S. (2001) ‘The Signifi cance and Roles of Teaching in International Relations’. Journal of International Relations and Development, 4(2), 98–117.
36. Guzzini S. (2004) ‘The Cold War is What We Make of It’. When Peace Research Meets Constructivism in International Relations. In S. Guzzini and D. Jung (eds.), Contemporary Security Analysis and Copenhagen Peace Research (pp. 40–53). New York: Routledge.
37. Guzzini S. (2005) ‘The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 495–521.
38. Hacking I. (1999) The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
39. Hansen L. (2006) Security as Practice. Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge.
40. Harmel R. (1967) Text of the Report of the Committee of Three on Non-Military Cooperation in NATO. The Future Tasks of the Alliance. The Harmel Report. Brussels: NATO, 13–14 December.
41. Hollis M. (1996) The Last Post? In S. Smith K. Booth and M. Zalewski (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (pp. 301–308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Huysmans J. (2002) ‘Defi ning Social Constructivism in Security Studies: The Normative Dilemma of Writing Security’. Alternatives, 27(1), 41–62.
43. Huysmans J. (2006) The Politics of Insecurity. Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. London and New York: Routledge.
44. Jackson P. T. (2011) The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations. Philosophy of Science and its Implications for the Study of World Politics. London and New York: Routledge.
45. Jentleso n, B. W. (2002) ‘The Need for Praxis. Bringing Policy Relevance Back In’. International Security, 26(4), 169–183.
46. Katzenstein P. J. (ed.). (1996) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
47. Keohane R. O. (1988) ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches, ISA Presidential Address’. International Studies Quarterly, 32(4), 379–396.
48. King G., Keohane R. O., and Verba, S. (1994) Designing Social Inquiry. Scientifi c Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. Klein B. S. (1988) ‘Hegemony and Strategic Culture: American Power Projection and Alliance Defence Politics’. Review of International Studies, 14(2), 133–148.
50. Klein B. S. (1994) Strategic Studies and World Order: The Global Politics of Deterrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Klein B. S. (1998) ‘Politics by Design: Remapping Security Landscapes’. European Journal of International Relations, 4(3), 327–345.
52. Kratochw il, F. (2007) ‘Of False Promises and Good Bets: A Plea for a Pragmatic Approach to Theory Building (the Tartu Lecture)’. Journal of International Relations and Development, 10(1), 1–15.
53. Krause K. and Williams M. C. (1997) Critical Security Studies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
54. Kruzel J. (1994) ‘More a Chasm Than a Gap, But Do Scholars Want to Bridge it?’. Mershon International Studies Review, 38, 179–181.
55. Laffey M. and Weldes, J. (1997) ‘Beyond Belief: Ideas and Symbolic Technologies in the Study of International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations, 3(2), 193–237.
56. Latour B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57. Leander A. (2002a) ‘The Cunning of Imperialist Reason: Using a Bourdieu Inspired Constructivism in IPE’. COPRI Working Paper, 33, 4–32.
58. Leander A. (2002b) ‘Do We Really Need Refl exivity in IPE? Bourdieu’s Two Reasons for Answering Affi rmatively’. Review of International Political Economy, 9(4), 601–609.
59. Leander A. (2010) Staging International Relations Practicing Bourdieu’s Sociology. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Studies Association (ISA), 17–20 February.
60. Lepgold J. and Nincic, M. (2001) Beyond the Ivory Tower. International Relations Theory and the Issue of Policy Relevance. New York: Columbia University Press.
61. Luhmann N. (1998) Observations on Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
62. Neumann I. B. (1999) The Uses of the Other. ‘The East’ in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
63. Neumann I. B. (2002) ‘Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 31(3), 627–653.
64. Newsom D. D. (1995) ‘Foreign Policy and Academia’. Foreign Policy, 101, 52–67.
65. Nierenbe rg, W. A. (2001) ‘NATO Science Programs: Origins and Infl uence’. Technology in Society, 23(3), 361–374.
66. Patomäki H. and Wight C. (2000) ‘After Postpositivism? The Promises of Critical Realism’. International Studies Quarterly, 44(2), 213–237.
67. Pouliot V. (2004) Toward a Bourdieusian Constructivism in IR: Outline of a Theory of Practice of Security Communities. Paper presented at the Fifth pan-European Conference, Standing Group on International Relations, 9–11 September.
68. Risse-Kap pen, T. (1994) ‘Ideas Do Not Float Freely. Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures, and the End of the Cold War’. International Organization, 48(2), 5–53.
69. Robin R. (2001) The Making of the Cold War Enemy. Culture and Politics in the Military- Intellectual Complex. Princeton, NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
70. Schinkel W. (2003) ‘Pierre Bourdieu’s Political Turn?’. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(6), 69–93.
71. Schubert J. D. (1995) ‘From a Politics of Transgression Toward an Ethic of Reflexivity’. American Behavioral Scientist, 38(7), 1003–1017.
72. Smith S. (1997) ‘Power and Truth: A Reply to William Wallace’. Review of International Studies, 23(4), 507–516.
73. Smith S. (2004) ‘Singing our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11’. International Studies Quarterly, 48(3), 499–515.
74. Solana J. (1999) ‘An Alliance Fit for the 21st Century’. NATO Review, 3(47), 3–4.
75. Swartz D. L. (1997) Culture and Power. The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
76. Swartz D. L. (2008) ‘Bringing Bourdieu’s Master Concepts into Organizational Analysis’. Theory and Society, 37(1), 45–52.
77. Swartz D. L. and Zolberg, V. L. (eds.). (2004) After Bourdieu. Influence, Critique, Elaboration. Dordrecht: Kluwer International Publishers.
78. Toews J. E. (1987) ‘Intellectual History after the Linguistic Turn: The Autonomy of Meaning and the Irreducibility of Experience’. The American Historical Review, 92(4), 879–907.
79. Villumsen T. (2008) Theory as Practice and Capital: NATO in a Bourdieusian Field of Security in Europe Towards a Sociological Approach to IR. Copenhagen, PhD Series 2008/4: University of Copenhagen.
80. Villumsen T. and Büger C. (2010) Security Expertise after Securitization: Coping with Dilemmas of Engaging with Practice. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Studies Association (ISA), 17–20 February.
81. Walker R. B. J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. Wallace W. (1996) ‘Truth and Power, Monks and Technocrats: Theory and Practice in International Relations’. Review of International Studies, 22(3), 301–321.
83. Whiting A. S. (1972) ‘The Scholar and the Policy-Maker’. World Politics, Spring, 229–247.
84. Widmaier W. W. (2004) ‘Theory as Factor and the Theorist as an Actor: The “Pragmatist Constructivist” Lessons of John Dewey and John Kenneth Galbraith’. International Studies Review, 6(3), 427–445.
85. Williams M. C. (1999) ‘The Practices of Security: Critical Contributions’, Cooperation and Confl ict, 34(3), 341–344.
86. Williams M. C. (2001) ‘The Discipline of the Democratic Peace: Kant, Liberalism and the Social Construction of Security Communities’. Cooperation and Confl ict, 7(4), 525–533.
87. Wyn Jones R. (2001) Critical Security and World Politics. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
88. Wæver O. (1995a) Securitization and Desecuritization. In R. D. Lipschutz (ed.), On Security (pp. 46–86). New York: Columbia University Press.
89. Wæver O. (1995b) What Is Security? – The Securityness of Security. In B. Hansen (ed.), European Security 2000. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Political Studies Press.
90. Wæver O. (1996) The Rise and Fall of the Inter-paradigm Debate (pp. 149–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
91. Wæver O. (1997) Concepts of Security. Copenhagen: Institute for Political Science, University of Copenhagen, PhD Dissertation.
92. Wæver O. (1999) ‘Securitizing Sectors?: Reply to Eriksson’. Cooperation and Confl ict, 34 (September), 334–340.
93. Wæver O. and B uzan, B. (2010) After the Return to Theory: The Past, Present, and Future of Security Studies. In A. Collins (ed.), Contemporary Security Studies (Vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
94. Zelikow P. (1994) ‘Foreign Policy Engineering: From Theory to Practice and Back Again’. International Security, 18(4), 143–171.