Evolution of the tan Locus Contributed to Pigment Loss in Drosophila santomea: A Response to Matute et al.

Cell

Volumn 139, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1189-1196

  Rebeiz, Mark ^a   Ramos Womack, Margarita ^b   Jeong, Sangyun ^a   Andolfatto, Peter ^b   Werner, Thomas ^a   True, John ^c   Stern, David L ^b   Carroll, Sean B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

DEVBIO; EVO_ECOL

Indexed keywords

HYDROLASE;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA SANTOMEA; DROSOPHILA YAKUBA; GENE LOCUS; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC CROSS; INTROGRESSION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SKIN PIGMENTATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; X CHROMOSOME;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA SANTOMEA;

EID: 71149115250     PISSN: 00928674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Beadle G. The ancestry of corn. Sci. Am. 242 (1980) 112-119
2. Carbone M.A., Llopart A., deAngelis M., Coyne J.A., and Mackay T.F. Quantitative trait loci affecting the difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea. Genetics 171 (2005) 211-225
3. Doebley J., and Stec A. Inheritance of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte: comparison of results for two F2 populations. Genetics 134 (1993) 559-570
4. Gloor G.B., and Engels W.R. Single fly DNA preps for PCR. Drosoph. Inf. Serv. 71 (1992) 148-149
5. Gupta M., Yates C.R., and Meibohm B. SYBR green-based real-time PCR allelic discrimination assay for beta2-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms. Anal. Biochem. 344 (2005) 292-294
6. Hawley R.S., and Gilliland W.D. Sometime the result is not the answer: the truths and lies that come from using the complementation test. Genetics 174 (2006) 5-15
7. Jeong S., Rebeiz M., Andolfatto P., Werner T., True J., and Carroll S.B. The evolution of gene regulation underlies a morphological difference between two Drosophila sister species. Cell 132 (2008) 783-793
8. Kopp A., Duncan I., Godt D., and Carroll S.B. Genetic control and evolution of sexually dimorphic characters in Drosophila. Nature 408 (2000) 553-559
9. Landry C.R., Hartl D.L., and Ranz J.M. Genome clashes in hybrids; insights from gene expression. Heredity 99 (2007) 483-493
10. Mackay T.F.C. Quantitative trait loci in Drosophila. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2 (2001) 11-20
11. Matute D.R., Butler I.A., and Coyne J.A. Little effect of the tan locus on pigmentation in female hybrids between Drosophila santomea and D. melanogaster. Cell 139 (2009) 1180-1188 this issue
12. Papp A.C., Pinsonneault J.K., Cooke G., and Sadee W. Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping using allele-specific PCR and fluorescence melting curves. Biotechniques 34 (2003) 1068-1072
13. Service P.M. How good are quantitative complementation tests?. Sci. Aging Knowledge Environ. 12 (2004) pe13
14. Stern D.L. A role of Ultrabithorax in morphological differences between Drosophila species. Nature 396 (1998) 463-466
15. Sucena E., and Stern D.L. Divergence of larval morphology between Drosophila sechellia and its sibling species caused by cis-regulatory evolution of ovo/shaven-baby. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 (2000) 4530-4534
16. The Complex Trait Consortium. The nature and identification of quantitative trait loci: a community's view. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4 (2003) 911-916
17. True J.R., Yeh S.D., Hovemann B.T., Kemme T., Meinertzhagen I.A., Edwards T.N., Liou S.R., Han Q., and Li J. Drosophila tan encodes a novel hydrolase required in pigmentation and vision. PLoS Genet. 1 (2005) e63
18. Williams T.M., Selegue J.E., Werner T., Gompel N., Kopp A., and Carroll S.B. The regulation and evolution of a genetic switch controlling sexual dimorphic traits in Drosophila. Cell 134 (2008) 610-623