Divergence in multiple courtship song traits between Drosophila santomea and D. yakuba

Ethology

Volumn 114, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 728-736

  Blyth, Jennifer E ^a   Lachaise, Daniel ^b   Ritchie, Michael G ^c  

^a ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b Institut de Neurosciences A Fessard   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COURTSHIP; DIVERGENCE; FLY; MATING SUCCESS; NEW SPECIES; RECOGNITION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SONG;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; GULF OF GUINEA;

DROSOPHILA SANTOMEA; DROSOPHILA YAKUBA; MELANOGASTER;

EID: 44949240668     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01519.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bennet-Clark, H. C. Ewing, A. W. 1967 : Stimuli provided by courtship of male Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 215, 669 671.
2. Bennet-Clark, H. C. Ewing, A. W. 1969 : Pulse interval as a critical parameter in the courtship song of Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 17, 755 759.
3. Chang, A. S. 2004 : Conspecific sperm precedence in sister species of Drosophila with overlapping ranges. Evolution 58, 781 789.
4. Cobb, M. Jallon, J.-M. 1990 : Pheromones, mate recognition and courtship stimulation in the Drosophila melanogaster species sub-group. Anim. Behav. 39, 1058 1067.
5. Coyne, J. A., Crittenden, A. P. Mah, K. 1994 : Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 265, 1461 1464.
6. Coyne, J. A., Kim, S. Y., Chang, A. S., Lachaise, D. Elwyn, S. 2002 : Sexual isolation between two sibling species with overlapping ranges: Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba. Evolution 56, 2424 2434.
7. Coyne, J. A., Elwyn, S., Kim, S. Y. Llopart, A. 2004 : Genetic studies of two sister species in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup, D. yakuba and D. santomea. Genet. Res. 84, 11 26.
8. Demetriades, M. C., Thackery, J. R. Kyriacou, C. P. 1999 : Courtship song rhythms in Drosophila yakuba. Anim. Behav. 57, 379 386.
9. Gleason, J. M. 2005 : Mutations and natural genetic variation in the courtship song of Drosophila. Behav. Genet. 35, 265 277.
10. Gleason, J. M. Ritchie, M. G. 1998 : Evolution of courtship song and reproductive isolation in the Drosophila willistoni species complex: Do sexual signals diverge the most quickly? Evolution 52, 1493 1500.
11. Gleason, J. M. Ritchie, M. G. 2004 : Do Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) for a courtship song difference between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia coincide with candidate genes and intraspecific QTL? Genetics 166, 1303 1311.
12. Gorczyca, M. Hall, J. C. 1987 : The Insectavox, an integrated device for recording and amplifying courtship songs of Drosophila. Dros. Inf. Serv. 66, 157 160.
13. Hoikkala, A. Aspi, J. 1993 : Criteria of female mate choice in Drosophila littoralis, D. montana and D. ezoana. Evolution 47, 768 777.
14. Hoikkala, A. Suvanto, L. 1999 : Male courtship song frequency as an indicator of male mating success in Drosophila montana. J. Insect Behav. 12, 599 609.
15. Hoikkala, A., Hoy, R. R. Kaneshiro, K. Y. 1989 : High-frequency clicks of Hawaiian picture winged Drosophila speices. Anim. Behav. 37, 927 934.
16. Hoy, R. R., Hoikkala, A. Kaneshiro, K. 1988 : Hawaiian courtship songs: evolutionary innovation in communication signals of Drosophila. Science 240, 217 219.
17. Kaneshiro, K. Y. Boake, C. R. B. 1987 : Sexual selection and speciation: issues raised by Hawaiian Drosophila. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2, 207 212.
18. Kyriacou, C. P. Hall, J. C. 1982 : The function of courtship song rhythms in Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 30, 794 801.
19. Kyriacou, C. P. Hall, J. C. 1986 : Interspecific genetic control of courtship song production and reception in Drosophila. Science 232, 494 497.
20. Lachaise, D., Harry, M., Solignac, M., Lemeunier, F., Benassi, V. Cariou, M. L. 2000 : Evolutionary novelties in islands: Drosophila santomea, a new melanogaster sister species from Sao Tome. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 267, 1487 1495.
21. Liimatainen, J., Hoikkala, A., Aspi, J. Welbergen, P. 1992 : Courtship in Drosophila montana: the effects of male auditory signals on the behaviour of flies. Anim. Behav. 43, 35 48.
22. Llopart, A., Elwyn, S., Lachaise, D. Coyne, J. A. 2002 : Genetics of a difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea. Evolution 56, 2262 2277.
23. Llopart, A., Lachaise, D. Coyne, J. A. 2005 : An anomalous hybrid zone in Drosophila. Evolution 59, 2602 2607.
24. Mas, F. Jallon, J. M. 2005 : Sexual isolation and cuticular hydrocarbon differences between Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba. J. Chem. Ecol. 31, 2747 2752.
25. Mendelson, T. C. Shaw, K. L. 2005 : Rapid speciation in an arthropod. Nature 433, 375 376.
26. Price, T. 1998 : Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 353, 251 260.
27. Ritchie, M. G., Halsey, E. J. Gleason, J. M. 1999 : Drosophila song as a species-specific mating signal, and the behavioural importance of Kyriacou & Hall cycles in D. melanogaster song. Anim. Behav. 58, 649 657.
28. Ritchie, M. G., Saarikettu, M., Livingstone, S. Hoikkala, A. 2001 : Characterisation of female preference functions for a sexually selected acoustic signal in D. montana, and a test of the "temperature coupling" hypothesis. Evolution 55, 721 727.
29. Rybak, F., Aubin, T., Moulin, B. Jallon, J. M. 2002a : Acoustic communication in Drosophila melanogaster courtship: Are pulse- and sine-song frequencies important for courtship success? Can. J. Zool. - Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 80, 987 996.
30. Rybak, F., Sureau, G. Aubin, T. 2002b : Functional coupling of acoustic and chemical signals in the courtship behaviour of the male Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 269, 695 701.
31. Saarikettu, M., Liimatainen, J. O. Hoikkala, A. 2005 : The role of male courtship song in species recognition in Drosophila montana. Behav. Genet. 35, 257 263.
32. Schilcher, F. v. 1976 : The function of pulse song and sine song in the courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 24, 622 625.
33. Shorey, H. H. 1962 : The nature of the sound produced by Drosophila melanogaster during courtship. Science 137, 677.
34. Snook, R. R., Robertson, A., Crudgington, H. S. Ritchie, M. G. 2005 : Experimental manipulation of sexual selection and the evolution of courtship song in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Behav. Genet. 35, 245 255.
35. Talyn, B. C. Dowse, H. B. 2004 : The role of courtship song in sexual selection and species recognition by female Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 68, 1165 1180.
36. Templeton, A. R. 1978 : Once again, why 300 species of Hawaiian Drosophila? Evolution 33, 513 517.
37. Tomaru, M. Oguma, Y. 2000 : Mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster and D. sechellia: criteria and their variation depending on courtship song. Anim. Behav. 60, 797 804.
38. Tomaru, M., Doi, M., Higuchi, H. Oguma, Y. 2000 : Courtship song recognition in the Drosophila melanogaster complex: heterospecific songs make females receptive in D. melanogaster, but not in D. sechellia. Evolution 54, 1286 1294.
39. Watson, E. T., Rodewald, E. Coyne, J. A. 2007 : The courtship song of Drosophila santomea and a comparison to its sister species D. yakuba (Diptera : Drosophilidae). Eur J Entomol 104, 145 148.