Author-team diversity and the impact of scientific publications: Evidence from physics research at a national science lab

Library and Information Science Research

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 249-257

  Hinnant, Charles C ^a   Stvilia, Besiki ^a   Wu, Shuheng ^a   Worrall, Adam ^a   Burnett, Gary ^a   Burnett, Kathleen ^a   Kazmer, Michelle M ^a   Marty, Paul F ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865566949     PISSN: 07408188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2012.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Adkins D., Budd J. Scholarly productivity of U.S. LIS faculty. Library and Information Science Research 2006, 28:374-389.
2. American Physical Society Search APS journals 2010, (Retrieved from http://publish.aps.org/search).
3. American Physical Society About Physical Review Letters 2011, (Retrieved from http://prl.aps.org/about).
4. Ancona D.G., Caldwell D.F. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science 1992, 3:321-341.
5. Baldi S. Normative versus social constructivist process in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model. American Sociological Review 1998, 63:829-846.
6. Beaver D.D. Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometrics 2001, 52:365-377.
7. Beaver D. Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority?. Scientometrics 2004, 60:399-408.
8. Birnholtz J. What does it mean to be an author? The intersection of credit, contribution and collaboration in science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57:1758-1770.
9. Bonzi S. Trends in research productivity among senior faculty. Information Processing and Management 1992, 28:111-120.
10. Boschma R.A. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies 2005, 39(1):61-74.
11. Bozeman B., Corley E. Scientists' collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy 2004, 33:599-616.
12. Bunderson J.S., Sutcliffe K.M. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal 2002, 45:875-893.
13. Cade B., Noon B. A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2003, 1:412-420.
14. Chompalov I., Genuth J., Shrum W. The organization of scientific collaborations. Research Policy 2002, 31:749-767.
15. Cohen J.E. Size, age and productivity of scientific and technical research groups. Scientometrics 1991, 20:395-416.
16. Cozzens S.E. What do citations count? The rhetoric-first model. Scientometrics 1989, 15:437-447.
17. Crane D. Invisible colleges 1972, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
18. Cronin B. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practice. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2001, 52:558-569.
19. Cronin B. Bowling alone together: Academic writing as distributed cognition. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2004, 55:557-560.
20. Cronin B. On the epistemic significance of place. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59:1002-1006.
21. Cronin B., Meho L.I. Timelines of creativity: A study of intellectual innovators in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007, 58:1948-1959.
22. Cronin B., Overfelt K. Citation-based auditing of academic performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1994, 45:61-72.
23. Cummings J.N., Kiesler S. Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science 2005, 35:703-722.
24. Cunningham S.J., Dillon S.M. Authorship patterns in information systems. Scientometrics 1997, 39:19-27.
25. Fox M.F. Sex, environmental milieu, and productivity in science. The outer circle 1991, 188-204. W. W. Norton, New York, NY. H. Zuckerman, J.R. Cole, J.T. Bruer (Eds.).
26. Gingras Y., Lariviere V., Macaluso B., Robitaille J. The effects of aging on researchers' publication and citation patterns. PLoS One 2008, 3(12). 10.1371/journal.pone.0004048.
27. Goffman W., Warren K.S. Scientific information systems and the principle of selectivity 1980, Praeger, New York, NY.
28. Guimera R., Uzzi B., Spiro J., Amaral L.A.N. Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science 2005, 308:697-702.
29. Hagstrom W.O. The scientific community 1965, Basic Books, New York, NY.
30. Harsanyi M.A. Multiple authors, multiple problems: Bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: A literature review. Library and Information Science Research 1993, 15:325-354.
31. Haslam N., Ban L., Kaufmann L., Loughnan S., Peters K., Whelan J., et al. What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology. Scientometrics 2008, 76:169-185.
32. Haslam N., Koval P. Predicting long-term citation impact of articles in social psychology. Psychological Reports 2010, 106:891-900.
33. Heffner A.G. Authorship recognition of subordinates in collaborative research. Social Studies of Science 1979, 9:377-384.
34. Hevly B.W. Reflections on big science and big history. Big science: The growth of large-scale research 1992, 355-363. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. P. Galison, B.W. Hevly (Eds.).
35. Hinds P.J., Bailey D.E. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science 2003, 14:615-632.
36. Hoegl M., Proserpio L. Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects. Research Policy 2004, 33:1153-1165.
37. Publishers International Linking Association Crossref.org Retrieved from. http://www.crossref.org/.
38. Joshi A., Roh H. The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal 2009, 52:599-628.
39. Katz J.S. Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics 1994, 31(1):31-43.
40. Katz J.S., Hicks D. How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics 1997, 40:541-554.
41. Katz J.S., Martin B.R. What is research collaboration?. Research Policy 1997, 26:1-18.
42. Koenker R., Hallock K.F. Quantile regression. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 2001, 15(4):143-156.
43. Kraut R., Egido C., Galegher J. Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration. Proceedings of the 1988 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 1988, 1-12. ACM Press, New York, NY. I. Greif (Ed.).
44. Lawani S.M. Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics 1986, 9:13-25.
45. Lee C.K. A scientometric study of the research performance of the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Singapore. Scientometrics 2003, 56:95-110.
46. Lee S., Bozeman B. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science 2005, 35:673-702.
47. Lindsey D. The scientific publication system in social science 1978, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
48. Lorigo L., Pellacini F. Frequency and structure of long distance scholarly collaborations in a physics community. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007, 58:1497-1502. 10.1002/asi.20638.
49. Martín-Sempere M.J., Garzón-García B., Rey-Rocha J. Team consolidation, social integration and scientists' research performance: An empirical study in the biology and biomedicine field. Scientometrics 2008, 76:457-482.
50. Merton R.K. The "Matthew effect" in science. Science 1968, 159:56-63.
51. Merton R.K. The normative structure of science. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations 1973, 254-266. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. N.W. Storer (Ed.).
52. Narin F., Stevens K., Whitlow E.S. Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics 1991, 21:313-323.
53. Narin F., Whitlow E.S. Measurement of scientific cooperation and coauthorship in CEC-related areas of science (Report EUR 12900) 1990, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
54. National High Magnetic Field Laboratory About the National High Magnetic Field Lab Retrieved from. http://www.magnet.fsu.edu/about/overview.html.
55. National High Magnetic Field Laboratory All peer-reviewed publications by journal name, 2000-2010 2010, June 15, Retrieved from http://www.magnet.fsu.edu/usershub/publications/ReportByJournal.aspx.
56. National High Magnetic Field Laboratory Annual reports 2010, (Retrieved from http://www.magnet.fsu.edu/mediacenter/publications/annualreport.aspx).
57. Olson G.M., Olson J.S. Distance matters. Human Computer Interaction 2000, 15:139-178.
58. Ponds R., van Oort F., Frenken K. The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science 2007, 86(3):423-443.
59. Porac J.F., Wade J.B., Fischer H.M., Brown J., Kanfer A., Bowker G. Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: A comparative case study of two scientific teams. Research Policy 2004, 33:661-678.
60. Price D.J.D.S. Little science, big science 1963, Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
61. Price D.J.D.S. Networks of scientific papers. Science 1965, 149:510-515.
62. Price D.J.D.S., Beaver D. Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist 1966, 21:1011-1018.
63. Reagans R., Zuckerman E., McEvily B. How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 2004, 49:101-133.
64. Reuters Thompson Journal Citation Reports Science Edition 2011, (Retrieved from http://admin-apps.isiknowledge.com).
65. Rousseau R. Why am I not cited, or why are multi-authored papers more cited than others?. Journal of Documentation 1992, 48:79-80.
66. Seglen P.O., Aksnes D.W. Scientific productivity and group size. A bibliometric analysis of Norwegian microbiological research. Scientometrics 2000, 49:125-143.
67. Shaw D., Vaughan L. Publication and citation patterns among LIS faculty: Profiling a 'typical professor'. Library and Information Science Research 2008, 30:47-55.
68. Simonton D.K. Greatness: Who makes history and why 1994, The Guilford Press, New York, NY.
69. Simonton D.K. Creativity in science: Change, logic, genius, and Zeitgeist 2004, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
70. Small H.G. On the shoulders of Robert Merton: Toward a normative theory of citation. Scientometrics 2004, 60:71-79.
71. Smith M. The trend toward multiple authorship in psychology. American Psychologist 1958, 13:596-599.
72. Stankiewicz R. The size and age of Swedish academic research groups and their scientific performance. Scientific productivity: The effectiveness of research groups in six countries 1979, 191-222. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA. F.M. Andrews (Ed.).
73. Stewart J.E. Achievement and ascriptive processes in the recognition of scientific articles. Social Forces 1983, 62:166-189.
74. Stokes T.D., Hartley J.A. Coauthorship, social structure, and influence with specialties. Social Studies of Science 1989, 19:101-125.
75. Stvilia B., Hinnant C.C., Schindler K., Worrall A., Burnett G., Burnett K., et al. Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011, 62(2):270-283. 10.1002/asi.21464.
76. Stvilia B., Mon L., Yi Y. A model for online consumer health information quality. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60:1781-1791.
77. Sugimoto C. Collaboration in information and library science doctoral education. Library and Information Science Research 2010, 33:3-11.
78. Tarnow E. Coauthorship in physics. Science and Engineering Ethics 2002, 8(2):175-190.
79. Teasely S., Wolinsky S. Scientific collaborations at a distance. Science 2001, 292:2254-2255.
80. Thorsteinsdóttir O.H. External research collaboration in two small science systems. Scientometrics 2000, 49:145-160.
81. Wray K.B. The epistemic significance of collaborative research. Philosophy of Science 2002, 69:150-168.
82. Wuchty S., Jones B.F., Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 2007, 316:1036-1039.
83. Zenger T.R., Lawrence B.S. Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. The Academy of Management Journal 1989, 32:353-376.