Venus and mars or down to Earth: Stereotypes and realities of gender Differences

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 688-692

  Fiske, Susan T ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ambivalence; Competence; Gender; Stereotypes; Stigma; Warmth

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955393360     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1745691610388768     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Clausell, E., & Fiske, S.T. (2005). When do the parts add up to the whole? Ambivalent stereotype content for gay male subgroups. Social Cognition, 23, 157-176.
2. Cuddy, A.J.C., Fiske, S.T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631-648.
3. Cuddy, A.J.C., Fiske, S.T., Kwan, V.S.Y., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J.-Ph., et al. (2009). Is the stereotype content model culture- bound?Across-cultural comparison reveals systematic similarities and differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1-33.
4. Eckes, T. (2002). Paternalistic and envious gender stereotypes: Testing predictions from the stereotype content model. Sex Roles, 47, 99-114.
5. Fiske, S.T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 357-411). New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Fiske, S.T., Bergsieker, H., Russell, A.M., & Williams, L. (2009). Images of Black Americans: Then, "them" and now, "Obama!" DuBois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 6, 83-101.
7. Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social perception: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 77-83.
8. Fiske, S.T., Moore, G., & Russell, A.M. (2006). [Mental illness subgroups in the stereotype content model]. Unpublished raw data, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
9. Glick, P., & Fiske, S.T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
10. Glick, P., & Fiske, S.T. (1999). The Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 519-536.
11. Harris, L.T., & Fiske, S.T. (2006). Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: Neuroimaging responses to extreme outgroups. Psychological Science, 17, 847-853.
12. Harris, L.T., & Fiske, S.T. (2009). Dehumanized perception: The social neuroscience of thinking (or not thinking) about disgusting people. In M. Hewstone & W. Stroebe (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 192-231). London: Wiley.
13. Hyde, J.S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 582-592.
14. Lee, T.L., & Fiske, S.T. (2006). Not an outgroup, but not yet an ingroup: Immigrants in the stereotype content model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 751-768.
15. Witkin, H.A., Moore, C.A., & Goodenough, D.R. & Cox, P.W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1-64.