Memory for actions: How different?

Memory, Aging and the Brain: A Festschrift in Honour of Lars-Göran Nilsson

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 24-52

  Roediger, Henry L ^a   Zaromb, Franklin M ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865437837     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203866665     Document Type: Chapter

References (125)

1. Bäckman, L., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1984). Aging effects in free recall: An exception to the rule. Human Learning, 3, 53-69.
2. Bäckman, L., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1985). Prerequisites for lack of age differences in memory performance. Experimental Aging Research, 11, 67-73.
3. Bäckman, L., Nilsson, L.-G., & Chalom, D. (1986). New evidence on the nature of the encoding of action events. Memory & Cognition, 14, 339-346.
4. Bäckman, L., Nilsson, L.-G., Herlitz, A., Nyberg, L., & Stigsdotter, A. (1991). A dual conception of the encoding of action events. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 32, 289-299.
5. Bäckman, L., Nilsson, L.-G., & Kormi-Nouri, R. (1993). Attentional demands and recall of verbal and color information in action events. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 34, 246-254.
6. Begg, I., & Snider, A. (1987). The generation effect: Evidence for generalized inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 553-563.
7. Bousfield, W. A. (1953). The occurrence of clustering in the recall of randomly arranged associates. Journal of General Psychology, 49, 229-240.
8. Bower, G. H. (1961). A contrast effect in differential encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 196-199.
9. Bower, G. H. (1972). Mental imagery and associative learning. In L. W. Gregg (Ed.), Cognition in learning and memory (pp. 51-88). New York: Wiley.
10. Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Morris, C. D., & Stein, B. S. (1979). Some constraints on learning and memory research. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing and human memory (pp. 331-354). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11. Brooks, B. M., & Gardiner, J. M. (1994). Age differences in memory for prospective compared with retrospective subject-performed tasks. Memory & Cognition, 22, 27-33.
12. Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 267-281.
13. Cohen, R. L. (1983). The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events. Memory & Cognition, 11, 573-582.
14. Cohen, R. L. (1985). On the generality of the laws of memory. In L.-G. Nilsson & T. Archer (Eds.), Perspectives on learning and memory (pp. 247-277). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Cohen, R. L. (1988). Metamemory for words and enacted instructions: Predicting which items will be recalled. Memory & Cognition, 16, 452-460.
16. Cohen, R. L. (1989). Memory for action events: The power of enactment. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 57-80.
17. Cohen, R. L., & Bean, G. (1983). Memory in educable mentally retarded adults:Deficit in subject or experimenter? Intelligence, 7, 287-298.
18. Cohen, R. L., & Bryant, S. (1991). The role of duration in memory and metamemory of enacted instructions (SPTs). Psychological Research, 53, 183-187.
19. Cohen, R. L., Sandler, S. P., & Schroeder, K. (1987). Aging and memory for words and action events: Effects of item repetition and list length. Psychology and Aging, 2, 280-285.
20. Cohen, R. L., & Stewart, M. (1982). How to avoid developmental effects in free recall. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23, 9-16.
21. Cornoldi, C., Corti, M. T., & Helstrup, T. (1994). Do you remember what you imagined you would do in that place? The motor encoding cue-failure effect in sighted and blind people. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 311-329.
22. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
23. Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268-294.
24. Daprati, E., Nico, D., Saimpont, A., Franck, N., & Sirigu, A. (2005). Memory and action: An experimental study on normal subjects and schizophrenic patients. Neuropsychologica, 43, 281-293.
25. Deese, J. (1959). Influence of inter-item associative strength upon immediate free recall. Psychological Reports, 5, 305-312.
26. Dijkstra, K., & Kaschak, M. P. (2006). Encoding in verbal, enacted and autobiographical tasks in young and older adults. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1338-1345.
27. Engelkamp, J. (1986). Differences between imaginal and motor encoding. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities. Amsterdam:Elsevier, North-Holland.
28. Engelkamp, J., & Cohen, R. L. (1991). Current issues in memory of action events. Psychological Research, 53, 175-182.
29. Engelkamp, J., & Dehn, D. M. (2000). Item and order information in subjectperformed tasks and experimenter-performed tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 671-682.
30. Engelkamp, J., & Jahn, P. (2003). Lexical, conceptual and motor information in memory for action phrases: A multi-system account. Acta Psychologica, 113, 147-165.
31. Engelkamp, J., & Krumnacker, H. (1980). Imagery and motor processes in the retention of verbal materials. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 27, 511-533.
32. Engelkamp, J., & Seiler, K. H. (2003). Gains and losses in action memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A 829-848.
33. Engelkamp, J., Seiler, K. H., & Zimmer, H. D. (2004). Memory for actions: Item and relational information in categorized lists. Psychological Research, 69, 1-10.
34. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1983). Zum Einfluβ von Wahrnehmen und Tun auf das Behalten von Verb-Objekt-Phrasen. Sprache & Kognition, 2, 117-127.
35. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1984). Motor program information as a separable memory unit. Psychological Research, 46, 283-299.
36. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1985). Motor programs and their relation to semantic memory. General Journal of Psychology, 9, 239-254.
37. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1990). Zur Architektur des Gedächtnisses. Magazin Forschung, 1, 2-7.
38. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1994). The human memory: A multimodal approach. Seattle: Hogrefe.
39. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1995). Similarity of movement in recognition of self-performed tasks and of verbal tasks. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 241-252.
40. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1996). Organisation and recall in verbal tasks and subject-performed tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 257-273.
41. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1997). Sensory factors in memory for subjectperformed tasks. Acta Psychologica, 96, 43-60.
42. Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H. D., & Biegelmann, U. E. (1993). Bizarreness effects in verbal tasks and subject-performed tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 393-415.
43. Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H. D., & Mohr, G. (1990). Differential effects of concrete nouns and action verbs. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 198, 189-216.
44. Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H. D., Mohr, G., & Sellen, O. (1994). Memory for selfperformed tasks: Self-performing during recognition. Memory & Cognition, 22, 34-39.
45. Erdelyi, M. H., & Becker, J. (1974). Hypermnesia for pictures: Incremental memory for pictures but not words in multiple recall trials. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 159-171.
46. Foley, M. A., & Johnson, M. K. (1985). Confusions between memories for performed and imagined actions: A developmental comparison. Child Development, 54, 51-60.
47. Foley, M. A., & Ratner, H. H. (2001). The role of action-based structures in activity memory. In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 112-135). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48. Freeman, J. E., & Ellis, J. A. (2003). Aging and the accessibility of performed and to-be-performed actions. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, 10, 298-309.
49. Gardiner, J. M., Brandt, K. R., Vargha-Khadem, F., Baddeley, A., & Mishkin, M. (2006). Effects of level of processing but not of task enactment on recognition memory in a case of developmental amnesia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 930-948.
50. Goff, L. M., & Roediger, H. L. III. (1998). Imagination inflation for action events:Repeated imaginings lead to illusory recollections. Memory & Cognition, 26, 20-33.
51. Golly-Häring, C., & Engelkamp, J. (2003). Categorical-relational and order-relational information in memory for subject-performed and experimenter-performed actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 965-975.
52. Helstrup, T. (1987). One, two, or three memories? A problem-solving approach to memory for performed acts. Acta Psychologica, 66, 37-68.
53. Hirshman, E., & Bjork, R. A. (1988). The generation effect: Support for a two-factor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 484-494.
54. Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 649-667.
55. Jenkins, J. J. (1979). Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 429-446). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
56. Jenkins, J. J., & Russell, W. A. (1952). Associative clustering during recall. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 818-821.
57. Karantzoulis, S., Rich, J. B., & Mangels, J. A. (2006). Subject-performed tasks improve associative learning in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 493-501.
58. Karlsson, T., Bäckman, L., Herlitz, A., Nilsson, L. G., Winblad, B., & Österlind, P. O. (1989). Memory improvement at different stages of Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia, 27, 737-742.
59. Knopf, M. (1991). Having shaved a kiwi fruit: Memory of unfamiliar subjectperformed actions. Psychological Research, 53, 203-211.
60. Knopf, M., Mack, W., Lenel, A., & Ferrante, S. (2005). Memory for action events: Findings in neurological patients. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 11-19.
61. Knopf, M., & Neidhardt, E. (1989). Gedächtnis für Handlungen unterschiedlicher Vertrautheit-Hinweise aus entwicklungspsychologischen Studien. Sprache & Kognition, 1, 203-215.
62. Koriat, A., Ben-Zur, H., & Druch, A. (1991). The contextualization of input and output events in memory. Psychological Research, 53, 260-270.
63. Koriat, A., & Pearlman-Avnion, S. (2003). Memory organization of action events and its relationship to memory performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 132, 435-454.
64. Kormi-Nouri, R. (1995). The nature of memory for action events: An episodic integration view. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 337-363.
65. Kormi-Nouri, R. (2000). The roles of movement and object in action memory: A comparative study between blind, blindfolded and sighted subjects. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 71-75.
66. Kormi-Nouri, R., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1998). The role of integration in recognition failure and action memory. Memory & Cognition, 26, 681-691.
67. Kormi-Nouri, R., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1999). Negative cueing effects with weak and strong intralist cues. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 199-218.
68. Kormi-Nouri, R., & Nilsson, L.-G. (2001). The motor component is not crucial! In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 97-111). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
69. Kormi-Nouri, R., Nyberg, L., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1994). The effect of retrieval enactment on recall of subject-performed tasks and verbal tasks. Memory & Cognition, 22, 723-728.
70. Madigan, S. (1983). Picture memory. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Imagery, memory and cognition (pp. 65-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
71. Mandler, G. (1967). Organization and memory. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1, pp. 327-372). New York:Academic Press.
72. McAndrews, M. P., & Milner, B. (1991). The frontal-cortex and memory for temporalorder. Neuropsychologia, 29, 849-859.
73. McDaniel, M. A., & Bugg, J. M. (2008). Instability in memory phenomena: A common puzzle and a unifying explanation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 237-255.
74. McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (1994). Effects of imagery on perceptual implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1379-1390.
75. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
76. Mimura, M., Komatsu, S., Kato, M., Yashimasu, H., Wakamatsu, N., & Kashima, H. (1998). Memory for subject performed tasks in patients with Korsakoff syndrome. Cortex, 34, 297-303.
77. Mohr, G., Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1989). Recall and recognition of selfperformed acts. Psychological Research, 51, 181-187.
78. Mulligan, N. W., & Hornstein, S. L. (2003). Memory for actions: Self-performed tasks and the reenactment effect. Memory & Cognition, 31, 412-421.
79. Nairne, J. S., Riegler, G. L., & Serra, M. (1991). Dissociative effects of generation on item and order information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 702-709.
80. Nilsson, L.-G. (1979). Functions of memory. In L.-G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research: Essays in honor of Uppsala University's 500th anniversary (pp. 3-15). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
81. Nilsson, L.-G. (2000). Remembering actions and words. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 137-148). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
82. Nilsson, L.-G., & Bäckman, L. (1989). Implicit memory and the enactment of verbal instructions. In S. Lewandowksy, J. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.), Implicit memory:Theoretical issues (pp. 173-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
83. Nilsson, L.-G., & Bäckman, L. (1991). Encoding dimensions of subject-performed tasks. Psychological Research, 53, 212-218.
84. Nilsson, L.-G., & Cohen, R. L. (1988). Enrichment and generation in the recall of enacted and non-enacted instructions. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 427-432). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
85. Nilsson, L.-G., & Craik, F. I. M. (1990). Additive and interactive effects in memory for subject-performed tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 305-324.
86. Nyberg, L., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1995). The role of enactment in implicit and explicit memory. Psychological Research, 57, 215-219.
87. Nyberg, L., Persson, J., & Nilsson, L.-G. (2002). Individual differences in memory enhancement by encoding enactment: Relationships to adult age and biological factors. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 835-839.
88. Olofsson, U. (1996). The effect of motor enactment on memory for order. Psychological Research, 59, 75-79.
89. Paivio, A. (1969). Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychological Review, 76, 241-263.
90. Paivio, A., & Csapo, K. (1973). Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding? Cognitive Psychology, 80, 279-285.
91. Paivio, A., Rogers, T. B., & Smythe, P. C. (1968). Why are pictures easier to recall than words? Psychonomic Science, 11, 1-2.
92. Paris, S. G., & Lindauer, B. (1976). The role of inference in children's comprehension and memory for sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 217-227.
93. Poulton, E. C. (1963). Compensatory tracking with differentiating and integrating control systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 398-402.
94. Rajaram, S., & Roediger, H. L. (1993). Direct comparison of four implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 765-776.
95. Roediger, H. L. (2008). Relativity of remembering: Why the laws of memory vanished. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 225-254.
96. Roediger, H. L., & Blaxton, T. A. (1987). Retrieval modes produce dissociations in memory for surface information. In D. S. Gorfein & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Memory and learning: The Ebbinghaus centennial conference (pp. 349-379). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
97. Roediger, H. L., & Srinivas, K. (1993). Specificity of operations in perceptual priming. In P. Graf & M. E. J. Masson (Eds.), Implicit memory: New directions in cognition, development and neuropsychology (pp. 17-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
98. Roediger, H. L., Weldon, M. S., Stadler, M. L., & Riegler, G. L. (1992). Direct comparison of two implicit memory tests: Word fragment and word stem completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1251-1269.
99. Rönnlund, M., Nyberg, L., Bäckman, L., & Nilsson, L.-G. (2003). Recall of subjectperformed tasks, verbal tasks, and cognitive activities across the adult life span:Parallel age-related deficits. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 10, 182-201.
100. Saltz, E., & Dixon, D. (1982). Let's pretend: The role of motoric imagery in memory for sentences and words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 77-92.
101. Saltz, E., & Donnerwerth-Nolan, S. (1981). Does motoric imagery facilitate memory for sentences? A selective interference test. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 322-332.
102. Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501-518.
103. Serra, M., & Nairne, J. S. (1993). Design controversies and the generation effect:Support for an item-order hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 21, 34-40.
104. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 589-607.
105. Slamecka, N. J., & Katsaiti, L. T. (1987). The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 589-607.
106. Steffens, M. C. (2007). Memory for goal-directed sequences of actions: Is doing better than seeing? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1194-1198.
107. Steffens, M. C., Buchner, A., & Wender, K. F. (2003). Quite ordinary retrieval cues may determine free recall of actions. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 399-415.
108. Teigen, K. H. (2002). One hundred years of laws in psychology. American Journal of Psychology, 115, 103-118.
109. Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. Lewiston, NY:Macmillan.
110. Tulving, E. (1962). Subjective organization in free recall of "unrelated" words. Psychological Review, 69, 219-237.
111. Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization and memory (pp. 381-403). New York: Academic Press.
112. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
113. Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247, 301-306.
114. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
115. Von Essen, J. D., & Nilsson, L.-G. (2003). Memory effects of motor activation in subject-performed tasks and sign language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 445-449.
116. Weldon, M. S., & Roediger, H. L. (1987). Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect. Memory & Cognition, 15, 269-280.
117. Wickens, D. D. (1970). Encoding categories of words: An empirical approach to meaning. Psychological Review, 77, 1-15.
118. Zimmer, H. D. (1991). Memory after motoric encoding in a generation-recognition model. Psychological Research, 53, 226-231.
119. Zimmer, H. D. (1994). Representation and processing of the spatial layout of objects with verbal and nonverbal input. In W. Schnotz & R. W. Kulhavy (Eds.), Comprehension and graphics (pp. 97-112). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North Holland.
120. Zimmer, H. D., & Cohen (2001). Remembering actions: A specific type of memory? In H.D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 3-24). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
121. Zimmer, H. D., Cohen, R. L., Guynn, M. J., Engelkamp, J., Kormi-Nouri, R., & Foley, M. A. (2001). Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
122. Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1984). Planungs- und ausführungsanteile motorischer gedächtniskomponenten und ihre wikrung auf das behalten ihrer verbalen bezeichnungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 192, 379-402.
123. Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1989). Does motor encoding enhance relational information? Psychological Research, 51, 158-167.
124. Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1999). Levels of processing effects in subjectperformed tasks. Memory & Cognition, 27, 907-914.
125. Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (2003). Signing enhances memory like performing actions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 450-454.