Gains and losses in action memory

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 56 A, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 829-848

  Engelkamp, Johannes ^a   Seiler, Kerstin H ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MEMORY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECALL;

HUMANS; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL;

EID: 0141575548     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980244000648     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Bäckman, L., Nilsson, L. G., & Chalom, D. (1986). New evidence on the nature of the encoding of action events. Memory & Cognition, 14, 339-346.
2. Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., & Gargano, G. J. (1993). Directed forgetting in implicit and explicit memory tests: A comparison of methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 603-616.
3. Burns, D. J. (1993). Item gains and item losses during hypermnesic recall: Implications for the item-specific-relational information distinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 163-173.
4. Burns, D. J., Curti, E. T., & Lavin, J. C. (1993). The effects of generation on item and order retention in immediate and delayed recall. Memory & Cognition, 21, 846-852.
5. Burns, D. J., & Schoff, K. M. (1999). Slow and steady often ties the race. The effects of item-specific and relational processing on cumulative recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1041-1051.
6. Burns, D. J., & Gold, D. E. (1999). An analysis of item gains and losses in retroactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 978-985.
7. Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268-294.
8. DeLosh, E. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). The role of order information in free recall: Application to the word-frequency effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1136-1146.
9. Ecker, W., & Engelkamp, O. (1995). Memory for actions in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 349-371.
10. Einstein, G. O., & Hunt, R. R. (1980). Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual item and relational processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 588-598.
11. Engelkamp, J. (1986). Nouns and verbs in paired-associate learning: Instructional effects. Psychological Research, 48, 153-159.
12. Engelkamp, J. (1988). Modality-specific encoding and word class in verbal learning. In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. N. Snykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (Vol. 1, pp. 415-420). Chichester: J. Wiley.
13. Engelkamp, J. (1995). Visual imagery and enactment of actions in memory. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 227-240.
14. Engelkamp, J. (1997). Memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for performed tasks. Memory & Cognition, 25, 117-124.
15. Engelkamp, J. (1998). Memory for actions. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
16. Engelkamp, J., & Dehn, D. M. (2000). Item and order information in subject-performed tasks and in experimenter-performed tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 671-682.
17. Engelkamp, J., & Seiler, K. (2002). Automatic and controlled encoding of categorical information in memory for action events. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18. Engelkamp, J., Mohr, G., & Zimmer, H. D. (1991). Pair-relational encoding of performed nouns and verbs. Psychological Research, 53, 232-239.
19. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1996). Organisation and recall in verbal tasks and in subject-performed tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 257-273.
20. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1997). Sensory factors in memory for subject-performed tasks. Acta Psychologica, 96, 43-60.
21. Erdelyi, M. H., & Becker, J. (1974). Hypermnesia for pictures: Incremental recall for pictures but not for words in multiple test trials. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 159-171.
22. Fischler, I., & Goodman, G. O. (1978). Latency of associative activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 455-470.
23. Helstrup, T. (1986). Separate memory laws for recall of performed acts? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 27, 1-29.
24. Hirshman, E., & Bjork, R. A. (1988). The generation effect: Support for a two-factor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 484-494.
25. Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 497-514.
26. Hunt, R. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 421-445.
27. Klein, S. B., Loftus, J., Kihlstrom, J. F., & Aseron, R. (1989). Effects of item-specific and relational information on hypermnesic recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1192-1197.
28. Knopf, M. (1991). Having shaved a kiwi fruit: Memory of unfamiliar subject-performed actions. Psychological Research, 53, 203-565.
29. Marschark, M., Richman, C. L., Yuille, J. C., & Hunt, R. R. (1987). The role of imagery in memory: On shared and distinctive information. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 28-41.
30. McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., DeLosh, E. L., May, C., & Brady, P. (1995). The bizarreness effect: It's not surprising, it's complex. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 422-435.
31. McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., Dunay, P. K., & Cobb, R. E. (1986). Encoding difficulty and memory: Toward a unifying theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 645-656.
32. McDaniel, M. A., Moore, B. A., & Whiteman, H. L. (1998). Dynamic changes in hypermnesia across early and late tests: A relational/item-specific account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 173-185.
33. McDaniel, M. A., Waddill, P. J., & Einstein, G. O. (1988). A contextual account of the generation effect: A three-factor theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 521-536.
34. Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.
35. Mohr, G., Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1989). Recall and recognition of self-performed acts. Psychological Research, 51, 181-187.
36. Mulligan, N. W. (1999). The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: Investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 54-69.
37. Mulligan, N. (2001). Generation and hypermnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 436-450.
38. Nairne J. S., Pusen, C., & Widener, R. J., Jr. (1985). Representation in the mental lexicon: Implications for theories of the generation effect. Memory & Cognition, 13, 183-191.
39. Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226-254.
40. Nilsson, L. G. (2000). Remembering actions and words. In F. I. M. Craik & E. Tulving (Eds.), Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 137-148). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Nilsson, L. G., & Cohen, R. (1988). Enrichment and generation in the recall of enacted and non-enacted instructions. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 427-432). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
42. Nilsson, L. G., Cohen, R., & Nyberg, L. (1989). Recall of enacted and nonenacted instructions compared: Forgetting functions. Psychological Research, 51, 188-193.
43. Nilsson, L. G., & Craik, F. I. M. (1990). Additive and interactive effects in memory for subject-performed tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 305-324.
44. Nyberg, L., & Nilsson, L. G. (1995). The role of enactment in implicit and explicit memory. Psychological Research, 57, 215-219.
45. Olofsson, U. (1997). Win some, lose some: Hypermnesia for actions reflects increased item-specific processing. Memory & Cognition, 25, 797-800.
46. Payne, D. G. (1986). Hypermnesia for pictures and words: Testing the recall level hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 16-29.
47. Payne, D. G. (1987). Hypermnesia and reminiscence in recall: A historical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 5-27.
48. Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2002). The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task. Psychological Research, 66, 180-194.
49. Roediger, H. L., & Challis, B. H. (1989). Hypermnesia: Improvements in recall with repeated testing. In C. Izawa (Ed.), Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Flowern Symposium on Cognition (pp. 175-199). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
50. Roediger, H. L., Payne, D. G., Gillespie, G. L., & Lean, D. S. (1982). Hypermnesia as determined by level of recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 635-655.
51. Roediger, H. L., & Thorpe, L. A. (1978). The role of recall time in producing hypermnesia. Memory & Cognition, 6, 296-305.
52. Serra, M., & Nairne, J. S. (1993). Design controversies and the generation effect: Support for an item-order hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 21, 34-40.
53. Steffens, M. C., & Erdfelder, E. (1998). Determinants of positive and negative generation effects in free recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 705-733.
54. Zimmer, H. D. (2001). Why do actions speak louder than words. Action memory as a variant of encoding manipulations or the result of a specific memory system? In H. D. Zimmer, R. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 151-198). New York: Oxford University Press.
55. Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1989). Does motor encoding enhance relational information? Psychological Research, 51, 158-167.
56. Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1999). Levels of processing effects in subject-performed tasks. Memory & Cognition, 27, 907-914.