Instability in memory phenomena: A common puzzle and a unifying explanation

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 237-255

  McDaniel, Mark A ^a   Bugg, Julie M ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; LONG TERM MEMORY; MEMORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RECALL; STIMULATION; TIME;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS;

EID: 48049094429     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.2.237     Document Type: Review

References (109)

1. ASCH, S. E., & EBENHOLTZ, S. M. (1962). The process of free recall: Evidence for non-associative factors in acquisition and retention. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary & Applied, 54, 3-31.
2. BENJAMIN, A. S. (2003). Predicting and postdicting the effects of word frequency on memory. Memory & Cognition, 31, 297-305.
3. BURNS, D. J. (1990). The generation effect: A test between single and multifactor theories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 1060-1067.
4. BURNS, D. J. (1996). The item-order distinction and the generation effect: The importance of order information in long-term memory. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 567-580.
5. BURNS, D. J., CURTI, E. T., & LAVIN, J. C. (1993). The effects of generation on item and order retention in immediate and delayed recall. Memory & Cognition, 21, 846-852.
6. CERMAK, L. S. (1975). Improving your memory. Oxford: Norton.
7. COHEN, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 267-281.
8. COHEN, R. L. (1983). The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events. Memory & Cognition, 11, 575-582.
9. COLLYER, S. C., JONIDES, J., & BEVAN, W. (1972). Images as memory aids: Is bizarreness helpful? American Journal of Psychology, 85, 31-38.
10. COX, S. D., & WOLLEN, K. A. (1981). Bizarreness and recall. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 244-245.
11. CRAIK, F. I., & TULVING, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268-294.
12. DEESE, J. (1960). Frequency of usage and number of words in free-recall: The role of association. Psychological Reports, 7, 337-344.
13. DELOSH, E. L., & MCDANIEL, M. A. (1996). The role of order information in free recall: Application to the word-frequency effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1136-1146.
14. DEWHURST, S. A., & PARRY, L. A. (2000). Emotionality, distinctiveness, and recollective experience. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 541-555.
15. DEWINSTANLEY, P. A., BJORK, E. L., & BJORK, R. A. (1996). Generation effects and the lack thereof: The role of transfer-appropriate processing. Memory, 4, 31-48.
16. EICHENBAUM, H. (2004). Hippocampus: Cognitive processes and neural representations that underlie declarative memory. Neuron, 44, 109-120.
17. EINSTEIN, G. O., & HUNT, R. R. (1980). Levels of processing and organization: Addictive effects of individual-item and relational processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 588-598.
18. EINSTEIN, G. O., & MCDANIEL, M. A. (1987). Distinctiveness and the mnemonic benefits of bizarre imagery. In M. A. McDaniel & M. Press-ley (Eds.), Imagery and related mnemonic processes: Theories, individual differences, and applications (pp. 78-102). New York: Springer.
19. ENGELKAMP, J., & DEHN, D. M. (2000). Item and order information in subject-performed tasks and experimenter-performed tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 671-682.
20. ENGELKAMP, J., JAHN, P., & SEILER, K. H. (2003). The item-order hypothesis reconsidered: The role of order information in free recall. Psychological Research, 67, 280-290.
21. ENGELKAMP, J., & ZIMMER, H. D. (1997). Sensory factors in memory for subject-performed tasks. Acta Psychologica, 96, 43-60.
22. ESTES, W. K. (1972). An associative basis for coding and organization in memory. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.), Coding processes in human memory (pp. 161-190). Washington, DC: Winston.
23. FUCHS, A. H. (1969). Recall for order and content of serial word lists in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 14-21.
24. GILLUND, G., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
25. GOLLY-HÄRING, C., & ENGELKAMP, J. (2003). Categorical-relational and order-relational information in memory for subject-performed and experimenter-performed actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 965-975.
26. GREENE, R. L., THAPAR, A., & WESTERMAN, D. L. (1998). Effects of generation on memory for order. Journal of Memory & Language, 38, 255-264.
27. GREGG, V. H. (1976). Word frequency, recognition, and recall. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition (pp. 183-216). Oxford: Wiley.
28. GREGG, V. H., MONTGOMERY, D. C., & CASTAÑO, D. (1980). Recall of common and uncommon words from pure and mixed lists. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 240-245.
29. GRONLUND, S. D., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1986). Retrieval strategies in recall of natural categories and categorized lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 550-561.
30. GUYNN, M. J., & MCDANIEL, M. A. (1999). Generate-sometimes recognize, sometimes not. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 398-415.
31. HADLEY, C. B., & MACKAY, D. G. (2006). Does emotion help or hinder immediate memory? Arousal versus priority-binding mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 79-88.
32. HALL, J. F. (1954). Learning as a function of word frequency. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 138-140.
33. HAUCK, P., WALSH, C., & KROLL, N. (1976). Visual imagery mnemonics: Common vs. bizarre mental images. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 160-162.
34. HINRICHS, J. V. (1970). A two-process memory strength theory for judgment of recency. Psychological Review, 77, 223-233.
35. HIRSHMAN, E., & BJORK, R. A. (1988). The generation effect: Support for a two-factor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 484-494.
36. HIRSHMAN, E., & MULLIGAN, N. (1991). Perceptual interference improves explicit memory but does not enhance data-driven processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 507-513.
37. HIRSHMAN, E., WHELLEY, M. M., & PALIJ, M. (1989). An investigation of paradoxical memory effects. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 594-609.
38. HUNT, R. R., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 20, 497-514.
39. HUNT, R. R., & ELLIOTT, J. M. (1980). The role of nonsemantic information in memory: Orthographic distinctiveness effects on retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 49-74.
40. HUNT, R. R., & MCDANIEL, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 421-445.
41. HUNT, R. R., & WORTHEN, J. (Eds.) (2006). Distinctiveness and memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
42. JACOBY, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 17, 649-667.
43. JACOBY, L. L., & HOLLINGSHEAD, A. (1990). Toward a generate/recognize model of performance on direct and indirect tests of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 433-454.
44. KINSBOURNE, M., & GEORGE, J. (1974). The mechanism of the word-frequency effect on recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 13, 63-69.
45. KINTSCH, W. (1970a). Learning, memory, and conceptual processes. Oxford: Wiley.
46. KINTSCH, W. (1970b). Models for free recall and recognition. In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory (pp. 331-373). New York: Academic Press.
47. KINTSCH, W. (1978). More on recognition failure of recallable words: Implications for generation-recognition models. Psychological Review, 85, 470-473.
48. KNOEDLER, A. J., HELLWIG, K. A., & NEATH, I. (1999). The shift from recency to primacy with increasing delay. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 474-487.
49. LEE, C. L., & ESTES, W. K. (1981). Item and order information in short-term memory: Evidence for multilevel perturbation processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 7, 149-169.
50. LEWANDOWSKY, S., & MURDOCK, B. B. (1989). Memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 96, 25-57.
51. LINTON, M. (1975). Memory for real-world events. In D. Norman & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Explorations in cognition (pp. 376-404). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
52. LORAYNE, H., & LUCAS, J. (1974). The memory book. New York: Stein &Day.
53. MANDLER, G. (1969). Input variables and output strategies in free recall of categorized lists. American Journal of Psychology, 82, 531-539.
54. MANDLER, G., & DEAN, P. J. (1969). Seriation: Development of serial order in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 207-215.
55. MAY, R. B., CUDDY, L. J., & NORTON, J. M. (1979). Temporal contrast and the word frequency effect. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 33, 141-147.
56. MCDANIEL, M. A., ANDERSON, D. C., EINSTEIN, G. O., & O'HALLORAN, C. M. (1989). Modulation of environmental reinstatement effects through encoding strategies. American Journal of Psychology, 102, 523-548.
57. MCDANIEL, M. A., DELOSH, E. L., & MERRITT, P. S. (2000). Order information and retrieval distinctiveness: Recall of common versus bizarre material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1045-1056.
58. MCDANIEL, M. A., DORNBURG, C. C., & GUYNN, M. J. (2005). Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: Implications for distinctiveness. Memory & Cognition, 33, 270-279.
59. MCDANIEL, M. A., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (1986). Bizarre imagery as an effective memory aid: The importance of distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 54-65.
60. MCDANIEL, M. A., EINSTEIN, G. O., DE LOSH, E. L., MAY, C. P., & BRADY, P. (1995). The bizarreness effect: It's not surprising, it's complex. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 422-435.
61. MCDANIEL, M. A., & GERACI, L. (2006). Encoding and retrieval processes in distinctiveness effects: Toward an integrative framework. In J. Worthen & R. R. Hunt (Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 65-88). New York: Oxford University Press.
62. MCDANIEL, M. A., WADDILL, P. J., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (1988). A contextual account of the generation effect: A three-factor theory. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 521-536.
63. MERRITT, P. S., DELOSH, E. L., & MCDANIEL, M. A. (2006). Effects of word frequency on individual-item and serial order retention: Tests of the order-encoding view. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1615-1627.
64. MERRY, R. (1980). Image bizarreness in incidental learning. Psychological Reports, 46, 427-430.
65. MULLIGAN, N. W. (1996). The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on implicit memory, explicit memory, and memory for source. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1067-1087.
66. MULLIGAN, N. W. (1999). The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: Investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 54-69.
67. MULLIGAN, N. W. (2000a). Perceptual interference and memory for order. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 680-697.
68. MULLIGAN, N. W. (2000b). Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: Evidence from multiple recall tests. Memory & Cognition, 28, 539-546.
69. MULLIGAN, N. W. (2001). Word frequency and memory: Effects on absolute versus relative order memory and on item memory versus order memory. Memory & Cognition, 29, 977-985.
70. MULLIGAN, N. W. (2002). The generation effect: Dissociating enhanced item memory and disrupted order memory. Memory & Cognition, 30, 850-861.
71. MULLIGAN, N. W., & Lozrro, J. P. (2007). Order information and free recall: Evaluating the item-order hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 732-751.
72. NAIRNE, J. S. (1988). The mnemonic value of perceptual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 248-255.
73. NAIRNE, J. S. (1992). The loss of positional certainty in long-term memory. Psychological Science, 3, 199-202.
74. NAIRNE, J. S., & KELLEY, M. R. (2004). Separating item and order information through process dissociation. Journal of Memory & Language, 50, 113-133.
75. NAIRNE, J. S., RIEGLER, G. L., & SERRA, M. (1991). Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 702-709.
76. NEATH, I.. & SURPRENANT, A. M. (2002). Human memory: An introduction to research, data, and theory. Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth.
77. NELSON, D. L., & MCEVOY, C. L. (2000). What is this thing called frequency? Memory & Cognition, 28, 509-522.
78. NELSON, D. L., & XU, J. (1995). Effects of implicit memory on explicit recall: Set size and word-frequency effects. Psychological Research, 57, 203-214.
79. NELSON, D. L., & ZHANG, N. (2000). The ties that bind what is known to the recall of what is new. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 604-617.
80. POSTMAN, L. (1972). A pragmatic view of organization theory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 3-38). New York: Academic Press.
81. PRA BALDI, A., DE BENI, R., CORNOLDI, C., & CAVEDON, A. (1985). Some conditions for the occurrence of the bizarreness effect in free recall. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 427-436.
82. RANSDELL, S. E., & FISCHLER, I. (1989). Effects of concreteness and task context on recall of prose among bilingual and monolingual speakers. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 278-291.
83. RAO, K. V., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1984). Study-phase processing and the word frequency effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 386-394.
84. ROEDIGER, H. L., III (2008). Relativity of remembering: Why the laws of memory vanished. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 225-254.
85. SCHMIDT, S. R. (1991). Can we have a distinctive theory of memory? Memory & Cognition, 19, 523-542.
86. SCHMIDT, S. R. (1994). Effects of humor on sentence memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 953-967.
87. SENTER, R. J., & HOFFMAN, R. R. (1976). Bizarreness as a nonessential variable in mnemonic imagery: A confirmation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 163-164.
88. SERRA, M., & NAIRNE, J. S. (1993). Design controversies and the generation effect: Support for an item-order hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 21, 34-40.
89. SLAMECKA, N. J., & GRAF, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 592-604.
90. SLAMECKA, N. J., & KATSAITI, L. T. (1987). The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 589-607.
91. SORACI, S. A., JR., FRANKS, J. J., BRANSFORD, J. D., CHECHILE, R. A., BELLI, R. F., CARR, M., & CARLIN, M. (1994). Incongruous item generation effects: A multiple-cue perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 67-78.
92. TOGLIA, M. P., & KIMBLE, G. A. (1976). Recall and use of serial position information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 2, 431-445.
93. TULVING, E., & MADIGAN, S. A. (1970). Memory and verbal learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 21, 437-484.
94. TULVING, E., & PEARLSTONE, Z. (1966). Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 5, 381-391.
95. TZENG, O. J. (1976). A precedence effect in the processing of verbal information. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 577-599.
96. TZENG, O. J., LEE, A. T., & WETZEL, C. D. (1979). Temporal coding in verbal information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 5, 52-64.
97. UNDERWOOD, B. J. (1969). Attributes of memory. Psychological Review, 76, 559-573.
98. UNDERWOOD, B. J. (1983). Attributes of memory. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
99. UNDERWOOD, B. J., & SCHULZ, R. W. (1960). Meaningfulness and verbal learning. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
100. WATKINS, M. J., LECOMPTE, D. C., & KIM, K. (2000). Role of study strategy in recall of mixed lists of common and rare words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 239-245.
101. WEBBER, S. M., & MARSHALL, P. H. (1978). Bizarreness effects in imagery as a function of processing level and delay. Journal of Mental Imagery, 2, 291-300.
102. WHITE, R. (2002). Memory for events after twenty years. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 603-612.
103. WOLLEN, K. A., & COX, S. (1981). Sentence cuing and the effectiveness of bizarre imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 7, 386-392.
104. WOLLEN, K. A., & MARGRES, M. G. (1987). Bizarreness and the imagery multiprocess model. In M. A. McDaniel & M. Pressley (Eds.), Imagery and related mnemonic processes: Theories, individual differences, and applications (pp. 103-128). New York: Springer.
105. WOLLEN, K. A., WEBER, A., & LOWRY, D. H. (1972). Bizarreness versus interaction of mental images as determinants of learning. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 518-523.
106. WORTHEN, J. B. (2006). Resolution of discrepant memory strengths: An explanation of the effects of bizarreness on memory. In R. R. Hunt & J. B. Worthen (Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 133-156). New York: Oxford University Press.
107. WORTHEN, J. B., GARCIA-RIVAS, G., GREEN, C. R., & VIDAS, R. A. (2000). Tests of a cognitive-resource-allocation account of the bizarreness effect. Journal of General Psychology, 127, 117-144.
108. ZAROMB, F. M. (2007). The effects of effort after meaning on recall in within and between subjects designs. Unpublished master's thesis, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
109. ZUCCO, G., TRAVERSA, A. B., & CORNOLDI, C. (1984). Ilruolo di dettagli non essenziali e delta loro predicibilita contestuale nella rievocazione di nemi di figure [The role of nonessential details and of their contextual predictivity in the recall of names of pictures]. Ricerche di Psicologia, 4, 44-58.