Aging and the Accessibility of Performed and To-Be-Performed Actions

Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 298-309

  Freeman, Jayne E ^a   Ellis, Judi A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; RECALL; RECOGNITION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 1642533500     PISSN: 13825585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/anec.10.4.298.28975     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bäckman, L. (1985). Further evidence for the lack of adult age differences on free recall of subject-performed tasks: The importance of motor action. Human Learning, 4, 79-87.
2. Bäckman, L., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1984). Aging effects in free recall: An exception to the rule. Human Learning, 3, 53-69.
3. Brooks, B.M., & Gardiner, J.M. (1994). Age differences in memory for prospective compared with retrospective subject-performed tasks. Memory and Cognition, 22, 27-33.
4. Cherry, K.E., & LeCompte, D.C. (1999). Age and individual differences in prospective memory. Psychology and Aging, 14, 60-76.
5. Cohen, R.L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 267-281.
6. Craik, F.I.M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms and Performances (pp. 409-422). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
7. Craik, F.I.M., & Jennings, J.M. (1992). Human memory. In F.I.M. Craik & T.A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 51-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Einstein, G.O., Holland, L.J., McDaniel, M.A., & Guynn, M.J. (1992). Age-related deficits in prospective memory: The influence of task complexity. Psychology and Aging, 7, 471-478.
9. Einstein, G.O., & McDaniel, M.A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 717-726.
10. Ellis, J.A. (1996). Prospective memory or the realisation of delayed intention: A conceptual framework for research. In M. Brandimonte, G.O. Einstein, & M.A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 1-22). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Asssociates.
11. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H.D. (1995). Similarity of motor movement in recognition of self-performed tasks and of verbal tasks. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 241-252.
12. Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). "Mini-mental state": A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
13. Freeman, J.E., & Ellis, J.A. (in press a). The representation of delayed intentions: A prospective subject-performed task? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition.
14. Freeman, J.E., & Ellis, J.A. (in press b). The intention-superiority effect for naturally-occurring activities: The role of intention accessibility in everyday prospective remembering in young and older adults. International Journal of Psychology.
15. Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (1993). The representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 1211-1226.
16. Kidder, D.P., Park, D.C., Hertzog, C., & Morrell, R. (1997). Prospective memory and aging: The effects of working memory and prospective memory task load. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 4, 93-112.
17. Kliegel, M., McDaniel, A., & Einstein, G.O. (2000). Plan formation, retention, and execution in prospective memory: A new approach and age-related effects. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1041-1049.
18. Koriat, A., Ben-Zur, H., & Nussbaum, A. (1990). Encoding information for future action: Memory for to-be-performed versus memory for to-be-recalled tasks. Memory and Cognition, 18, 568-578.
19. Kuhl, J., & Goschke, T. (1994). State orientation and the activation and retrieval of intentions in memory. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.). Volition and personality: Action versus state Orientation (pp. 127-153). Seattle: Hogrefe and Huber.
20. Mäntylä, T. (1994). Remembering to remember: Adult age differences in prospective memory. Journals of Gerontology, 49, P276-P282.
21. Marsh, R.L., Hicks, J.L., & Bink, M.L. (1998). The activation of completed, uncompleted and partially completed intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 24, 350-361.
22. Marsh, R.L., Hicks, J.L., & Bryan, E.S. (1999). The activation of unrelated and cancelled intentions. Memory and Cognition, 27, 320-327.
23. Maylor, E.A. (1996). Age-related impairment in an event-based prospective memory task. Psychology and Aging, 11, 74-78.
24. Maylor, E.A., Darby, R.J., & Della Sala, S. (2000). Retrieval of performed vs. to-be-performed tasks: A naturalistic study of the intention-superiority effect in normal aging and dementia. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S83-S98.
25. McDaniel, M.A., & Einstein, G.O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S127-S144.
26. Meacham, J.A., & Leiman, B. (1982). Remembering to perform future actions. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts (pp. 327-336). San Francisco: Freeman.
27. Norris, M.P., & West, R.L. (1993). Activity memory and aging. The role of motor retrieval and strategic processing. Psychology and Aging, 8, 81-86.
28. Park, D.C., Hertzog, C., Kidder, D.P., Morell, R.W., & Mayhorn, C.B. (1997). Effect of age on event-based and time-based prospective memory. Psychology and Aging, 12, 314-327.
29. Rendell, P.G., & Thomson, D.M. (1999). Aging and prospective memory: Differences between naturalistic and laboratory tasks. Journals of Gerontology: Series B - Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54, P256-P269.
30. Terry, W.S. (1988). Everyday forgetting: Data from a diary study. Psychological Report, 62, 299-303.
31. Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
32. West, R.L. (1996). An application of prefrontal cortex theory to cognitive aging. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 272-292.
33. West, R.L., & Craik, F.I.M. (1999). Age-related decline in prospective memory: The roles of cue accessibility and cue sensitivity. Psychology and Aging, 14, 264-272.
34. Zimmer, H.D., Helstrup, T., & Engelkamp, J. (2000). Pop-out into memory: A retrieval mechanism that is enhanced with the recall of subject-performed tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 658-670.