Re-appreciating the why of cognition: 35 years after Marr and Poggio

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 2, Issue SEP, 2011, Pages

  Willems, Roel M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cognition; Computational level; Context; Goal; Marr

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865433670     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00244     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annu.Rev.Psychol.59, 617-645.
2. Bennett, M. R., and Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
3. Berthoz, A., and Petit, J.-L. (2008). The Physiology and Phenomenology of Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Brass, M., Schmitt, R. M., Spengler, S., and Gergely, G. (2007). Investigating action understanding: inferential processes versus action simulation. Curr. Biol. 17, 2117-2121.
5. Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artif. Intell. 47, 139-159.
6. Bub, D. N., and Masson, M. E. (2006). Gestural knowledge evoked by objects as part of conceptual representations. Aphasioloy 20, 1112-1124.
7. Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
8. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cohen Kadosh, K., Henson, R. N., Cohen Kadosh, R., Johnson, M. H., and Dick, F. (2010). Task-dependent activation of face-sensitive cortex: an fMRI adaptation study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 903-917.
10. de Lange, F. P., Spronk, M., Willems, R. M., Toni, I., and Bekkering, H. (2008). Complementary systems for understanding action intentions. Curr. Biol. 18, 454-457.
11. Dennett, D. C. (1987). The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cogn. Psychol. 47, 164-203.
12. Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D., and Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Curr.Dir.Psychol.Sci.11, 11-15.
13. Ferreira, F., and Patson, N. D. (2007). The 'good enough' approach to language comprehension. Lang. Linguist. Compass 1, 71-83.
14. Friederici, A. D., Bahlmann, J., Heim, S., Schubotz, R. I., and Anwander, A. (2006). The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: functional localization and structural connectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 2458-2463.
15. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the Body Shapes the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
17. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin and Company.
18. Girardi, G., Lindemann, O., and Bekkering, H. (2010). Context effects on the processing of action-relevant object features. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 36, 330-340.
19. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., and Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569-1579.
20. Kaakinen, J. K., and Hyönä, J. (2010). Task effects on eye movements during reading. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 36, 1561-1566
21. Lamme, V. A., and Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends Neurosci. 23, 571-579.
22. Lamme, V. A., Zipser, K., and Spekreijse, H. (1998). Figure-ground activity in primary visual cortex is suppressed by anesthesia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 3263-3268.
23. Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
24. Marr, D. (1982). Vision.NewYork:W. H. Freeman.
25. Marr, D., and Poggio, T. (1976). From Understanding Computation to Understanding Neural Circuitry. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
26. Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58, 25-45.
27. Mesulam, M. M. (1990). Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory. Ann. Neurol. 28, 597-613.
28. Mesulam, M. M. (1998). From sensation to cognition. Brain 121, 1013-1052.
29. Noe, A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
30. Olshausen, B. A., and Field, D. J. (2005). How close are we to understanding v1? Neural Comput. 17, 1665-1699.
31. O'Regan, J. K., and Noe, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 939-973.
32. Ortigue, S., Sinigaglia, C., Rizzolatti, G., and Grafton, S. T. (2010). Understanding actions of others: the electrodynamics of the left and right hemispheres. a high-density eeg neuroimaging study. PLoS ONE 5, e12160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012160
33. Pack, C. C., Berezovskii, V. K., and Born, R. T. (2001). Dynamic properties of neurons in cortical area MT in alert and anaesthetized macaque monkeys. Nature 414, 905-908
34. Pack, C. C., and Born, R. T. (2001). Temporal dynamics of a neural solution to the aperture problem in visual area MT of macaque brain. Nature 409, 1040-1042.
35. Pfeifer, R., and Bongard, J. C. (2007). How the Body Shapes the Way We Think. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
36. Robbins, P., and Aydede, M. (2008). The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. Santi, A., and Grodzinsky, Y. (2007). Working memory and syntax interact in Broca's area. Neuroimage 37, 8-17.
38. Shallice, T. (1988). From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance; Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
40. Spunt, R. P., Satpute, A. B., and Lieberman, M. D. (2010). Identifying the what, why, and how of an observed action: an fMRI study of mentalizing and mechanizing during action observation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 63-74.
41. Taylor, L. J., and Zwaan, R. A. (2010). Grasping spheres, not planets. Cognition 115, 39-45.
42. Teller, D. Y. (1984). Linking propositions. Vision Res. 24, 1233-1246.
43. Tipper, S. P., Paul, M. A., and Hayes, A. E. (2006). Vision-foraction: the effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13, 493-498.
44. Tucker, M., and Ellis, R. (2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychol. 116, 185-203.
45. van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Linderholm, T., and Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers' goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Mem. Cogn. 29, 1081-1087.
46. Verhagen, A. (2010). "What do you think is the proper place of recursion? Conceptual and empirical issues," in Recursion and Human Language, ed. H. van der Hulst (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), 93-112.
47. Wheeler, M. (2005). Reconstructing the Cognitive World. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
48. Willems, R. M., and Casasanto, D. (2011). Flexibility in embodied language understanding. Front. Psychol. 2:116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00116
49. Willems, R. M., Peelen, M. V., and Hagoort, P. (2010). Cerebral lateralization of face-selective and body-selective visual areas depends on handedness. Cereb. Cortex 20, 1719-1725.
50. Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 20, 920-933.