Grasping spheres, not planets

Cognition

Volumn 115, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 39-45

  Taylor, Lawrence J ^a   Zwaan, Rolf A ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Action; Affordances; Concepts; Grasping; Language; Planning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; GRIP STRENGTH; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADULT; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SIZE PERCEPTION; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77249132177     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abrams R.A., and Balota D.A. Mental chronometry: Beyond reaction time. Psychological Science 2 (1991) 153-157
2. Angel A. Input-output relations in simple reaction time experiments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 25 (1973) 193-200
3. Bub D.N., and Masson M.E.J. Gestural knowledge evoked by objects as part of conceptual representations. Aphasiology 20 9 (2006) 1112-1124
4. Bub D.N., Masson M.E.J., and Cree G.S. Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition 106 1 (2008) 27-58
5. Creem S.H., and Proffitt D.R. Grasping objects by their handles: A necessary interaction between cognition and action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 1 (2001) 218-228
6. Creem-Regehr S.H., Dilda V., Vicchrilli A.E., Federer F., and Lee J.N. The influence of complex action knowledge on representations of novel graspable objects: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of International Neuropsychological Society 13 (2007) 1009-1020
7. Creem-Regehr S.H., and Lee J.N. Neural representations of graspable objects: Are tools special?. Cognitive Brain Research 22 (2005) 457-469
8. Culham J.C., and Valyear K.F. Human parietal cortex in action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 16 (2006) 205-212
9. Gentilucci M., and Gangitano M. Influence of automatic word reading on motor control. European Journal of Neuroscience 10 (1998) 752-756
10. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception (1979), Boston, Houghton Mifflin
11. Glenberg A.M. What memory is for?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1997) 1-55
12. Glover S. Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2004) 2-78
13. Glover S., and Dixon P. Semantics affect the planning but not the control of grasping. Experimental Brain Research 146 (2002) 383-387
14. Glover S., Rosenbaum D.A., Graham J., and Dixon P. Grasping the meaning of words. Experimental Brain Research 154 (2004) 103-108
15. Goodale M.A. Action without perception in human vision. Cognitive Neuropsychology 25 7-8 (2008) 891-919
16. Goodale M.A., and Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences 15 (1992) 20-25
17. Grafton S.T., Fadiga L., Arbib M.A., and Rizzolatti G. Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. NeuroImage 6 4 (1997) 231-236
18. Jaskowski P., Rybarczyk K., Jaroszyk F., and Lemanski D. The effect of stimulus intensity on force output in simple reaction time task in humans. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis 55 1 (1995) 57-64
19. Lindemann O., Abolafia J.M., Girardi G., and Bekkering H. Getting a grip on numbers: Numerical magnitude priming in object grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33 6 (2007) 1400-1409
20. Lindemann O., Stenneken P., van Schie H.T., and Bekkering H. Semantic activation in action planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32 3 (2006) 633-643
21. Martin A. The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology 58 (2007) 25-45
22. Martin A., Wiggs C.L., Ungerleider L.G., and Haxby J.V. Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 379 (1996) 649-652
23. Mattes S., Ulrich R., and Miller J. Response force on RT tasks: Isolating effects of stimulus probability and response probability. Visual Cognition 9 (2002) 477-501
24. Meulenbroek R.G.J., Bosga J., Hulstijn M., and Miedl S. Joint-action coordination in transferring objects. Experimental Brain Research 180 (2007) 333-343
25. Miller J., Franz V., and Ulrich R. Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks. Perception and Psychophysics 61 (1999) 107-119
26. Myung J.Y., Blumstein S.E., and Sedivy J.C. Playing on the typewriter, typing on the panio: Manipulation knowledge of objects. Cognition 98 3 (2006) 223-243
27. Postle N., McMahon K.L., Ashton R., Meredith M., and de Zubicaray G.I. Action word meaning representations in cytoarchitectonically defined primary and premotor cortices. NeuroImage 43 3 (2008) 634-644
28. Preissler M.A., and Bloom P. Two-year-olds appreciate the dual nature of pictures. Psychological Science 18 1 (2007) 1-2
29. Rice N.J., Valyear K.F., Goodale M.A., Milner A.D., and Culham J.C. Orientation sensitivity to graspable objects: An fMRI adaptation study. NeuroImage 36 (2007) T87-T93
30. Rizzolatti G., and Matelli M. Two different streams for the dorsal visual system: Anatomy and functions. Experimental Brain Research 153 (2003) 147-157
31. Rosenbaum D.A. The Cinderella of psychology: The neglect of motor control in the science of mental life and behavior. American Psychologist 60 4 (2005) 308-317
32. Sebanz N., Knoblich G., Prinz W., and Wascher E. Twin peaks: An ERP study of action planning and control in coacting individuals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 5 (2006) 859-870
33. Tucker M., and Ellis R. The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition 8 6 (2001) 769-800
34. Valyear K.F., Culham J.C., Sharif N., Westwood D., and Goodale M.A. A double dissociation between sensitivity to changes in object identity and object orientation in the ventral and dorsal visual streams: A human fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 44 (2006) 218-228
35. Vingerhoets G., Vandamme K., and Vercammen A. Conceptual and physical object qualities contribute differently to motor affordances. Brain and Cognition 69 (2009) 481-489
36. Waszak F., Wascher E., Keller P., Koch I., Aschersleben G., Rosenbaum D.A., et al. Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection. Experimental Brain Research 162 (2005) 346-356
37. Wolpert D.M., Doya K., and Kawato M. A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 358 (2003) 593-602