Accumulation and rapid decay of non-LTR retrotransposons in the genome of the three-spine stickleback

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 687-702

  Blass, Eryn ^a   Bell, Michael ^b   Boissinot, Stéphane ^a,c  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Gasterosteus aculeatus; Genome size evolution; Non LTR retrotransposon; Retroposon; Three spine stickleback

Indexed keywords

EUTHERIA; GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS; MAMMALIA; TELEOST FISH; TELEOSTEI; TETRAODONTIDAE; VERTEBRATA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DNA SEQUENCE; FISH; GENE DELETION; GENETICS; GENOME; LONG TERMINAL REPEAT; MAMMAL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; RETROPOSON; SMEGMAMORPHA;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FISHES; GENOME; MAMMALS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; RETROELEMENTS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEQUENCE DELETION; SMEGMAMORPHA; TERMINAL REPEAT SEQUENCES;

EID: 84865420717     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evs044     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aguirre WE. 2007. The pattern and process of evolutionary diversification: lessons from a threespine stickleback adaptive radiation. Stony Brook (NY): Stony Brook University. p. 205.
2. Akagi K, Li J, Stephens RM, Volfovsky N, Symer DE. 2008. Extensive variation between inbred mouse strains due to endogenous L1 retrotransposition. Genome Res. 18:869-880. (Pubitemid 351793059)
3. Basta HA, Buzak AJ, McClure MA. 2007. Identification of novel retroid agents in Danio rerio, Oryzias latipes, Gasterosteus aculeatus and Tetraodon nigroviridis. Evol Bioinform Online. 3:179-195.
4. Bell MA, Foster SA, editors. 1994. The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Bensasson D, Petrov DA, Zhang DX, Hartl DL, Hewitt GM. 2001. Genomic gigantism: DNA loss is slow in mountain grasshoppers. Mol Biol Evol. 18:246-253. (Pubitemid 32118869)
6. Boissinot S, Davis J, Entezam A, Petrov D, Furano AV. 2006. Fitness cost of LINE-1 (L1) activity in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103: 9590-9594. (Pubitemid 43955869)
7. Boissinot S, Entezam A, Furano AV. 2001. Selection against deleterious LINE-1-containing loci in the human lineage. Mol Biol Evol. 18: 926-935. (Pubitemid 32520464)
8. Brookfield JF, Badge RM. 1997. Population genetics models of transposable elements. Genetica 100:281-294. (Pubitemid 28034775)
9. Brouha B, et al. 2003. Hot L1s account for the bulk of retrotransposition in the human population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 100:5280-5285. (Pubitemid 36542696)
10. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. 1983. The population dynamics of transposable elements. Genet Res. 42:1-27. (Pubitemid 14229237)
11. Deagle BE, et al. 2011. Population genomics of parallel phenotypic evolution in stickleback across stream-lake ecological transitions. Proc Biol Sci. 279:1277-1286.
12. Devos KM, Brown JK, Bennetzen JL. 2002. Genome size reduction through illegitimate recombination counteracts genome expansion in Arabidopsis. Genome Res. 12:1075-1079. (Pubitemid 34785200)
13. Duvernell DD, Pryor SR, Adams SM. 2004. Teleost fish genomes contain a diverse array of L1 retrotransposon lineages that exhibit a low copy number and high rate of turnover. J Mol Evol. 59:298-308. (Pubitemid 39159182)
14. Furano AV. 2000. The biological properties and evolutionary dynamics of mammalian LINE-1 retrotransposons. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 64:255-294.
15. Furano AV, Duvernell D, Boissinot S. 2004. L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposon diversity differs dramatically between mammals and fish. Trends Genet. 20:9-14. (Pubitemid 38035206)
16. Garcia Guerreiro MP, Chavez-Sandoval BE, Balanya J, Serra L, Fontdevila A. 2008. Distribution of the transposable elements bilbo and gypsy in original and colonizing populations of Drosophila subobscura. BMC Evol Biol. 8:234.
17. Gregory TR. 2003. Is small indel bias a determinant of genome size? Trends Genet. 19:485-488. (Pubitemid 37101088)
18. Gregory TR. 2004. Insertion-deletion biases and the evolution of genome size. Gene 324:15-34. (Pubitemid 38030322)
19. Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 41:95-98.
20. Hawkins JS, Proulx SR, Rapp RA, Wendel JF. 2009. Rapid DNA loss as a counterbalance to genome expansion through retrotransposon proliferation in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106: 17811-17816.
21. Hohenlohe PA, et al. 2010. Population genomics of parallel adaptation in threespine stickleback using sequenced RAD tags. PLoS Genet. 6:e1000862.
22. Jones FC, Chan YF, Schmutz J, et al. 2012. A genome-wide SNP genotyping array reveals patterns of global and repeated speciespair divergence in sticklebacks. Curr Biol. 22:83-90.
23. Kapitonov V, Jurka J. 1999. Expander, Repbase Update, release 4.07. Available from: http://www.girinst.org/repbase/update
24. Kapitonov VV, Tempel S, Jurka J. 2009. Simple and fast classification of non-LTR retrotransposons based on phylogeny of their RT domain protein sequences. Gene 448:207-213.
25. Kordis D, Gubensek F. 1998. Unusual horizontal transfer of a long interspersed nuclear element between distant vertebrate classes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 95:10704-10709. (Pubitemid 28413132)
26. Lander ES, et al. 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409:860-921. (Pubitemid 32165345)
27. Langley CH, Montgomery E, Hudson R, Kaplan N, Charlesworth B. 1988. On the role of unequal exchange in the containment of transposable element copy number. Genet Res. 52:223-235. (Pubitemid 19031127)
28. Lockton S, Ross-Ibarra J, Gaut BS. 2008. Demography and weak selection drive patterns of transposable element diversity in natural populations of Arabidopsis lyrata. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105: 13965-13970.
29. Ma J, Devos KM, Bennetzen JL. 2004. Analyses of LTR-retrotransposon structures reveal recent and rapid genomic DNA loss in rice. Genome Res. 14:860-869. (Pubitemid 38660503)
30. Martin SL, Li W-HP, Furano AV, Boissinot S. 2005. The structures of mouse and human L1 elements reflect their insertion mechanism. Cytogenet Genome Res. 110:223-228. (Pubitemid 41159901)
31. McClure MA, et al. 2005. Automated characterization of potentially active retroid agents in the human genome. Genomics 85:512-523. (Pubitemid 40386480)
32. Montgomery E, Charlesworth B, Langley CH. 1987. A test for the role of natural selection in the stabilization of transposable element copy number in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 49:31-41.
33. Montgomery EA, Langley CH. 1983. Transposable elements in Mendelian populations. II. Distribution of three COPIA-like elements in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 104:473-483.
34. Neafsey DE, Blumenstiel JP, Hartl DL. 2004. Different regulatory mechanisms underlie similar transposable element profiles in pufferfish and fruitflies. Mol Biol Evol. 21:2310-2318. (Pubitemid 39488901)
35. Novick PA, Basta H, Floumanhaft M, McClure MA, Boissinot S. 2009. The evolutionary dynamics of autonomous non-LTR retrotransposons in the lizard Anolis carolinensis shows more similarity to fish than mammals. Mol Biol Evol. 26:1811-1822.
36. Nuzhdin SV, Pasyukova EG, Mackay TF. 1996. Positive association between copia transposition rate and copy number in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Biol Sci. 263:823-831. (Pubitemid 26334768)
37. Petrov D, Aminetzach YT, Davis JC, Bensasson D, Hirsh AE. 2003. Size matters: non-LTR retrotransposable elements and ectopic recombination in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 20:880-892. (Pubitemid 36578714)
38. Petrov DA. 2002. Mutational equilibrium model of genome size evolution. Theor Popul Biol. 61:531-544.
39. Petrov DA, Fiston-Lavier AS, Lipatov M, Lenkov K, Gonzalez J. 2011. Population genomics of transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol. 28:1633-1644.
40. Petrov DA, Hartl DL. 1997. Trash DNA is what gets thrown away: high rate of DNA loss in Drosophila. Gene 205:279-289. (Pubitemid 28029622)
41. Petrov DA, Sangster TA, Johnston JS, Hartl DL, Shaw KL. 2000. Evidence for DNA loss as a determinant of genome size. Science 287:1060-1062. (Pubitemid 30094365)
42. Poulter R, Butler M, Ormandy J. 1999. A LINE element from the pufferfish (fugu) Fugu rubripes which shows similarity to the CR1 family of non-LTR retrotransposons. Gene 227:169-179. (Pubitemid 29104852)
43. Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ. 2000. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misener S, editors. Bioinformatics methods and protocols: methods in molecular biology. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press. p. 365-386.
44. Song M, Boissinot S. 2007. Selection against LINE-1 retrotransposons results principally from their ability to mediate ectopic recombination. Gene 390:206-213.
45. Volff JN. 2005. Genome evolution and biodiversity in teleost fish. Heredity 94:280-294.
46. Volff JN, Bouneau L, Ozouf-Costaz C, Fischer C. 2003. Diversity of retrotransposable elements in compact pufferfish genomes. Trends Genet. 19:674-678. (Pubitemid 37464841)
47. Volff JN, Korting C, Schartl M. 2000. Multiple lineages of the non-LTR retrotransposon Rex1 with varying success in invading fish genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 17:1673-1684.
48. Waterston RHK, et al. 2002. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420:520-562.
49. Zupunski V, Gubensek F, Kordis D. 2001. Evolutionary dynamics and evolutionary history in the RTE clade of non-LTR retrotransposons. Mol Biol Evol. 18:1849-1863. (Pubitemid 32916638)