Distributed Learning: Data, Metacognition, and Educational Implications

Educational Psychology Review

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 379-399

  Son, Lisa K ^a   Simon, Dominic A ^b  

^a Program on US Russia Relations at Columbia s Harriman Institute   (United States)

^b NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Distributed learning; Distributed practice; Massing; Metacognition; Motor learning; Spacing effect

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865414107     PISSN: 1040726X     EISSN: 1573336X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-012-9206-y     Document Type: Review

References (143)

1. Adams, J. A. (1987). Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 41-74.
2. Agarwal, P. K., Karpicke, J. D., Kang, S. H. K., Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (2008). Examining the testing effect with open- and closed-book tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 861-876.
3. Ammons, R. B. (1988). Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: A few questions and comments. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 288-290.
4. Anderson, J. R. (2000). Cognitive psychology and its implications (5th ed.). New York: Worth.
5. Atkinson, R. (1972). Ingredients for a theory of instruction. American Psychologist, 27, 921-931.
6. Austin, S. D. M. (1921). A study in logical memory. The American Journal of Psychology, 32(3), 370-403.
7. Baddeley, A. D., & Longman, D. J. A. (1978). The influence of length and frequency of training session on the rate of learning to type. Ergonomics, 21, 627-635.
8. Bahrick, L. E. (1987). Infants' intermodal perception of two levels of temporal structure in natural events. Infant Behavior & Development, 10, 387-416.
9. Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, L. E., Bahrick, A. S., & Bahrick, P. E. (1993). Maintenance of foreign language vocabulary and the spacing effect. Psychological Science, 4, 316-321.
10. Balota, D. A., Duchek, J. M., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2006). Does expanded retrieval produce benefits over equal-interval spacing? Explorations of spacing effects in healthy aging and early stage Alzheimer's disease. Psychology and Aging, 21, 19-31.
11. Battig, W. F. (1966). Facilitation and interference. In E. A. Bilodeau (Ed.), Acquisition of skill. New York: Academic.
12. Battig, W. F. (1972). Intratask interference as a source of facilitation on transfer and retention. In E. F. Thompson & J. F. Voss (Eds.), Topics in learning and performance. New York: Academic.
13. Benjamin, A. S., & Bird, R. (2006). Metacognitive control of the spacing of study repetitions. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 126-137.
14. Bjork, R. A. (1979). Information-processing analysis of college teaching. Educational Psychologist, 14, 15-23.
15. Bjork, R. A. (1988). Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 396-401). New York: Wiley.
16. Bjork, R. A., & Allen, T. W. (1970). The spacing effect: Consolidation or differential encoding? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 567-572.
17. Boyce, B. A., & Del Rey, P. (1990). Designing applied research in a naturalistic setting using a contextual interference paradigm. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 18, 189-200.
18. Bregman, A. S. (1967). Distribution of practice and between-trials interference. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 21, 1-14.
19. Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. D. (2005). On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10, 14-21.
20. Cahill, A., & Toppino, T. C. (1993). Young children's recognition as a function of the spacing of repetitions and the type of study and test stimuli. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 481-484.
21. Carlson, R. A., & Yaure, R. G. (1990). Practice schedules and the use of component skills in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 484-496.
22. Carlson, R. A., Sullivan, M. A., & Schneider, W. (1989). Practice and working memory effects in building procedural skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 517-526.
23. Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2005). Application of the testing and spacing effects to name learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 619-636.
24. Carpenter, S. K., & Pashler, H. (2007). Testing beyond words: Using tests to enhance visuospatial map learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 474-478.
25. Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., & Cepeda, N. J. (2009). Using tests to enhance 8th grade students' retention of U. S. history facts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 760-771.
26. Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354-380.
27. Cepeda, N. J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., & Pashler, H. (2008). Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 19, 1095-1102.
28. Challis, B. H. (1993). Spacing effects on cued-memory tests depend on level of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 389-396.
29. Challis, B. H., & Brodbeck, D. R. (1992). Level of processing affects priming in word fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 595-607.
30. Christina, R. W., & Shea, J. B. (1988). The limitations of generalization based on restricted information. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 291-297.
31. Commins, S., Cunningham, L., Harvey, D., & Walsh, D. (2003). Massed but not spaced training impairs spatial memory. Behavioral Brain Research, 139, 215-223.
32. Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 76, 1-62.
33. Cornell, E. H. (1980). Distributed study facilitates infants' delayed recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 8, 539-542.
34. Crowder, R. G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
35. Cuddy, L. J., & Jacoby, L. L. (1982). When forgetting helps memory: An analysis of repetition effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 451-467.
36. Cull, W. L. (2000). Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 215-235.
37. Cull, W. L., Shaughnessy, J. J., & Zechmeister, E. B. (1996). Expanding understanding of the expanding-pattern-of-retrieval mnemonic: Toward confidence in applicability. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 2, 365-378.
38. Culler, E. A. (1912). The effect of distribution of practice upon learning. Journal of Philosophical Psychology, 9, 580-583.
39. Delaney, P. F., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., & Spirgel, A. (2010). Spacing and testing effects: A deeply critical, lengthy, and at times discursive review of the literature. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 53, pp. 63-147). New York: Elsevier.
40. Dempster, F. N. (1987). Effects of variable encoding and spaced presentations on vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 162-170.
41. Dempster, F. N. (1988). The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. American Psychologist, 43, 627-634.
42. Dempster, F. N. (1989). Spacing effects and their implications for theory and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 309-330.
43. Dempster, F. N. (1996). Distributing and managing the conditions of encoding and practice. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Memory. San Diego: Academic.
44. Donovan, J. J., & Radosevich, D. J. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 795-805.
45. Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (1998). What makes people study more? An evaluation of four factors that affect people's self-paced study. Acta Psychologica, 98, 37-56.
46. Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Über das Gedchtnis. Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot; The English edition is Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory. A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
47. English, H. B., Wellborn, E. L., & Killian, C. D. (1934). Studies in substance memorization. The Journal of General Psychology, 11, 233-260.
48. Estes, W. K. (1955). Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression. Psychological Review, 62, 145-154.
49. Galluccio, L., & Rovee-Collier, C. (2006). Nonuniform effects of reinstatement within the time window. Learning and Motivation, 37, 1-17.
50. Gay, L. R. (1973). Temporal position of reviews and its effect on the retention of mathematical rules. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 171-182.
51. Glenberg, A. M. (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 7, 95-112.
52. Glenberg, A. M., & Lehmann, T. S. (1980). Spacing repetitions over 1 week. Memory & Cognition, 8, 528-538.
53. Glover, J. A. (1989). The "testing" phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 392-399.
54. Glover, J. A., & Corkill, A. J. (1987). Influence of paraphrased repetitions on the spacing effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 198-199.
55. Goode, S., & Magill, R. A. (1986). Contextual interference effects in learning three badminton serves. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 57, 308-314.
56. Greene, R. L. (1992). Human memory: Paradigms and paradoxes. Hills-dale: Erlbaum.
57. Greeno, J. G. (1970). Conservation of information-processing capacity in paired-associate memorizing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 581-586.
58. Hall, K. G., Domingues, D. A., & Cavazos, R. (1994). Contextual interference effects with skilled baseball players. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 835-841.
59. Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99-136.
60. Hendy, L., & Whitebread, D. (2000). Interpretations of independent learning in the early years. International Journal Early Years Education, 8(3), 245-252.
61. Hintzman, D. L. (1974). Theoretical implications of the spacing effect. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola symposium (pp. 77-97). Potomac: Erlbaum.
62. Hintzman, D. L. (1976). Repetition and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 10). New York: Academic.
63. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 5, 306-340.
64. Jamieson, B. A., & Rogers, W. A. (2000). Age-related effects of blocked and random practice schedules on learning a new technology. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 55B, 343-353.
65. Janiszewski, C., Noel, H., & Sawyer, A. G. (2003). A meta-analysis of the spacing effect in verbal learning: Implications for research on advertising repetition and consumer memory. The Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 138-149.
66. Jost, A. (1897). Die Assoziationsfestigkeit in ihrer Abhängigkeit von der Verteilung der Wiederholungen [The strength of associations in their dependence on the distribution of repetitions]. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 16, 436-472.
67. Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practice retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17, 471-479.
68. Koriat, A. (2008). Easy comes, easy goes? The link between learning and remembering and its exploitation in metacognition. Memory & Cognition, 36, 416-428.
69. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008). Learning concepts and categories: Is spacing the "enemy of induction"? Psychological Science, 19, 585-592.
70. Kornell, N., & Son, L. K. (2009). Learners' choices and beliefs about self-testing. Memory, 17, 493-501.
71. Kraft, R. N., & Jenkins, J. J. (1981). The lag effect with aurally presented passages. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 17, 132-134.
72. Lakshmanan, A., Lindsey, C. D., & Krishnan, H. S. (2010). Practice makes perfect? When does massed learning improve product usage proficiency? The Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 599-613.
73. Landauer, T. K., & Bjork, R. A. (1978). Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 625-632). London: Academic.
74. Lashley, K. S. (1915). The acquisition of skill in archery. Papers from the Department of Marine Biology of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, 7, 105-128.
75. Le Blanc, K. & Simon, D. A. (2008). Mixed practice enhances retention and JOL accuracy for mathematical skills. Poster presented at the 2008 annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago, IL.
76. Lee, T. D., & Genovese, E. D. (1988). Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: Learning and performance effects reconsidered. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 277-287.
77. Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1983). The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 730-746.
78. Lee, T. D., & Simon, D. A. (2004). Contextual interference. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (pp. 29-44). London: Routledge.
79. Lee, T. D., & Wishart, L. R. (2005). Motor learning conundrums (and possible solutions). Quest, 57, 67-78.
80. Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9, 241-289.
81. McCabe, J. (2011). Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates. Memory & Cognition, 39, 462-476.
82. Melton, A. W. (1970). The situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 596-606.
83. Metcalfe, J., Kornell, N., & Son, L. K. (2007). A cognitive-science based programme to enhance study efficacy in a high and low risk setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 743-768.
84. Moss, V. D. (1996). The efficacy of masses versus distributed practice as a function of desired learning outcomes and grade level of the student. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 5204.
85. Murphy, H. H. (1916). Distributions of practice periods in learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 7, 150-162.
86. Newell, K. M., Antoniou, A., & Carlton, L. G. (1988). Massed and distributed practice effects: Phenomena in search of a theory? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 308-313.
87. Pashler, H., Rohrer, D., Cepeda, N., & Carpenter, S. (2007). Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 187-193.
88. Pavlik, P. I., & Anderson, J. R. (2003). An ACT-R model of the spacing effect. In F. Detje, D. Dorner, & H. Schaub (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Cognitive Modeling (pp. 177-182). Bamberg: Universitats-Verlag Bamberg.
89. Perkins, N. L. (1914). The value of distributed repetitions in rote learning. British Journal of Psychology, 7, 253-261.
90. Perruchet, P. (1989). The effect of spaced practice on explicit and implicit memory. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 113-130.
91. Peterson, L. R., Hillner, K., & Saltzman, D. (1962). Time between pairings and short-term retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 550-551.
92. Peterson, L. R., Wampler, R., Kirkpatrick, M., & Saltzman, D. (1963). Effect of spacing presentations on retention of a paired associate over short intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 206-209.
93. Pirolli, P., & Anderson, J. R. (1985). The role of practice in fact retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 136-153.
94. Pyc, M. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2010). Toward an understanding of students' allocation of study time: When do they decide to mass or space their practice? Memory & Cognition, 38, 431-440.
95. Pyle, W. H. (1915). Concentrated versus distributed practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 5, 247-258.
96. Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (2003). Spacing and repetition effects in human memory: Application of the SAM model. Cognitive Science, 27, 431-452.
97. Rawson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (2005). Rereading effects depend on time of test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 70-80.
98. Rea, C. P., & Modigliani, V. (1987). The spacing effect in 4- to 9-year-old children. Memory & Cognition, 15, 436-443.
99. Reynolds, J. H., & Glaser, R. (1964). Effects of repetition and spaced review upon retention of a complex learning task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 297-308.
100. Robinson, E. S. (1921). The relative efficiencies of distributed and concentrated study in memorizing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 327-343.
101. Roediger, H. L., & Challis, B. H. (1992). Effects of exact repetition and conceptual repetition on free recall and primed word fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 3-14.
102. Roediger, H. L., Agarwal, P. K., Kang, S. H. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2010). Benefits of testing memory: Best practices and boundary conditions. In G. M. Davies & D. B. Wright (Eds.), New frontiers in applied memory (pp. 13-49). Brighton: Psychology.
103. Rohrer, D. (2009). The effects of spacing and mixing practice problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40, 4-17.
104. Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2010). Recent research on human learning challenges conventional instructional strategies. Educational Researcher, 39, 406-412.
105. Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2006). The effects of overlearning and distributed practice on the retention of mathematics knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1209-1224.
106. Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2007). The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning. Instructional Science, 35, 481-498.
107. Rohrer, D., Taylor, K., Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., & Wixted, J. T. (2005). The effect of overlearning on long-term retention. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 361-374.
108. Ruch, T. C. (1928). Factors influencing the relative economy of massed and distributed practice in learning. Psychological Review, 35, 19-45.
109. Saxon, J. (1982). Incremental development: A breakthrough in mathematics. Phi Delta Kappan, 63, 482-484.
110. Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207-217.
111. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (4th ed.). Urbana-Champaign: Human Kinetics.
112. Seabrook, R., Brown, G. D. A., & Solity, J. E. (2005). Distributed and massed practice: From laboratory to classroom. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 107-122.
113. Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179-187.
114. Shea, C. H., Kohl, R., & Indermill, C. (1990). Contextual interference: Contributions of practice. Acta Psychologica, 73, 145-157.
115. Simon, D. A., & Bjork, R. A. (2001). Metacognition in motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 907-912.
116. Sisti, H. M., Glass, A. L., & Shors, T. J. (2007). Neurogenesis and the spacing effect: Learning over time enhances memory and he survival of new neurons. Learning & Memory, 14, 368-375.
117. Son, L. K. (2004). Metacognitively controlled spacing of study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 601-604.
118. Son, L. K. (2005). Metacognitive control: Children's short-term versus long-term study strategies. The Journal of General Psychology, 132, 347-363.
119. Son, L. K. (2007). Introduction: A metacognition bridge. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 481-493.
120. Son, L. K. (2010). Metacognitive control and the spacing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 255-262.
121. Son, L. K., & Kornell, N. (2010). The virtues of ignorance. Behavioral Processes, 83, 207-212.
122. Spreng, M., Rossier, J., & Shenk, F. (2002). Spaced training facilitates long-term retention of place navigation in adult but not in adolescent rats. Behavioral Brain Research, 128, 103-108.
123. Stigler, J. W., Lee, S., Lucker, W. G., & Stevenson, H. W. (1982). Curriculum and achievement in mathematics: A study of elementary school children in Japan, Taiwan, and the United States. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 315-322.
124. Stoeger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2005). Evaluation of an elementary classroom self-regulated learning program for gifted mathematics underachievers. International Education Journal, 6, 261-271.
125. Taylor, K., & Rohrer, D. (2010). The effects of interleaving practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 837-848.
126. Toppino, T. C. (1991). The spacing effect in young children's free recall: Support for automatic-process explanations. Memory & Cognition, 19, 159-167.
127. Toppino, T. C. (1993). The spacing effect in preschool children's free recall of pictures and words. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 27-30.
128. Toppino, T. C., & Cohen, M. S. (2010). Metacognitive control and spaced practice: Clarifying what people do and why. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1480-1492.
129. Toppino, T. C., & DeMesquita, M. (1984). Effects of spacing repetitions on children's memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 27-30.
130. Toppino, T. C., & DiGeorge, W. (1984). The spacing effect in free recall emerges with development. Memory & Cognition, 12, 118-122.
131. Toppino, T. C., Kasserman, J. E., & Mracek, W. A. (1991). The effect of spacing repetitions on the recognition memory of young children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 123-138.
132. Toppino, T. C., Cohen, M. S., Davis, M., & Moors, A. (2009a). Metacognitive control over the distribution of practice: When is spacing preferred? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1352-1358.
133. Toppino, T. C., Fearnow-Kenney, M. D., Kiepert, M. H., & Teremula, A. C. (2009b). The spacing effect in intentional and incidental free recall by children and adults: Limits on the automaticity hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 37, 316-325.
134. Underwood, B. J. (1970). A breakdown of the total-time law in free-recall learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 573-580.
135. Vander Linde, E., Morrongiello, B. A., & Rovee-Collier, C. (1985). Determinants of retention in 8-week old infants. Developmental Psychology, 21, 601-613.
136. Vash, C. L. (1989). The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. American Psychologist, 44, 1547.
137. Vlach, H. A., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2012). Distributing learning over time: The spacing effect in children's acquisition and generalization of science concepts. Child Development, 83, 1137-1144.
138. Vlach, H. A., Sandhofer, C. M., & Kornell, N. (2008). The spacing effect in children's memory and category induction. Cognition, 109, 163-167.
139. Whitten, W. B., & Bjork, R. A. (1977). Learning from tests: Effects of spacing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 465-478.
140. Wilson, W. P. (1976). Developmental changes in the lag effect: An encoding hypothesis for repeated word recall. Psychological Review, 111, 864-879.
141. Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. (1954). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
142. Zechmeister, E. B., & Shaughnessy, J. J. (1980). When you know that you know and when you think that you know but you don't. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 41-44.
143. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64-70.