Intelligence 2.0: Reestablishing a Research Program on g in I-O Psychology

Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 128-148

  Scherbaum, Charles A ^a   Goldstein, Harold W ^a   Yusko, Kenneth P ^b   Ryan, Rachel ^a   Hanges, Paul J ^c  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865401741     PISSN: 17549426     EISSN: 17549434     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01419.x     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Ackerman, P. L. (1992). Predicting individual differences in complex skill acquisition: Dynamics of ability determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 598-614.
2. Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2002). Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 567-589.
3. Alfonso, V. C., Flanagan, D. P., & Radwan, S. (2005). The impact of the Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory on test development and interpretation of cognitive and academic performance. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 185-202). New York, NY: Guilford.
4. Bartholomew, D. J. (2004). Measuring intelligence: Facts and fallacies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5. Baum, J. R., Bird, B. J., & Singh, S. (2011). The practical intelligence of entrepreneurs: Antecedents and a link with new venture growth. Personnel Psychology, 64, 397-425.
6. Binet, A., & Henri, V. (1895). La psychologie individuelle. L'Annee Psychologique, 2, 411-465.
7. Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1905/1916). New methods for diagnosis of the intellectual level of subnormals. In The development of intelligence children (E. S. Kite, Trans.) Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
8. Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1911/1916). New investigation upon the measure of the intellectual level among school children. In The development of intelligence in children (E. S. Kite, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
9. Boal, K. B. (2004). Strategic leadership. In G. R. Goethals, G. J. Sorenson & J. M. Burns (Eds.), Encyclopedia of leadership (pp. 1497-1504). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 687-732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists' Press.
11. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12. Cascio, W. F. (1995). Whither industrial and organizational psychology in a changing world of work? American Psychologist, 50, 928-939.
13. Cattell, J. M. (1893). Tests of the senses and faculties. Educational Review, 5, 257-265.
14. Cattell, R. B. (1890). Mental tests and measurements. Mind, 15, 373-381.
15. Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1-22.
16. Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
17. 2. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Minds in context: Interactionist perspectives on human intelligence (pp. 74-101). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
18. Chen, J., & Gardner, H. (2005). Assessment based on multiple-intelligence theory. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 77-102). New York, NY: Guilford.
19. Cianciolo, A. T., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Intelligence: A brief history. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
20. Danemann, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422-433.
21. Davidson, J. E., & Downing, C. L. (2000). Contemporary models of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 34-49). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22. DeNisi, A., Hitt, M. A. & Jackson, S. E. (2003). The knowledge-based approach to sustaining competitive advantage. In S. E. Jackson, M. A. Hitt, & A. S. DeNisi (Eds.), Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage (pp. 3-33). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
23. Embretson, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179-197.
24. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Fagan, J. F. (2000). A theory of intelligence as processing: Implications for society. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 168-179.
26. Fagan, J. F., & Holland, C. R. (2002). Equal opportunity and racial differences in IQ. Intelligence, 30, 361-387.
27. Fagan, J. F., & Holland, C. R. (2007). Racial equality in intelligence: Predictions from a theory of intelligence as processing. Intelligence, 35, 319-334.
28. Flanagan, D. P., & Harrison, P. L. (2005). Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29. Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., & Alfonso, V. C. (2007). Essentials of cross-battery assessment (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
30. Fleishman, E. A. (1966). Human abilities and the acquisition of skill. In E. A. Bilodeau (Ed.), Acquisition of skill. New York, NY: Academic Press.
31. Fleishman, E. A., & Quaintance, M. K. (1984). Taxonomies of human performance: The description of human tasks. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
32. Gatewood, R., Field, H., & Barrick M. (2011). Human resource selection (6th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
33. Gatewood, R. D. & Feild, H. S. (2001). Human resource selection (5th ed.) Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
34. Ghiselli, E. E. (1966). The validity of occupational aptitude tests. New York, NY: Wiley.
35. Goddard, H. H. (1913). The Kallikak family: A study in the heredity of feeble-mindedness. New York, NY: Macmillan.
36. Goldstein, H. W., Scherbaum, C. A., & Yusko, K. (2009). Adverse impact and measuring cognitive ability. In J. Outtz (Ed.) Adverse impact: Implications for organizational staffing and high stakes testing (pp. 95-134). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
37. Goldstein, H. W., Zedeck, S., & Goldstein, I. L. (2002). g: Is this your final answer? Human Performance, 15, 123-142.
38. Gottfredson, L. (1997a). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24, 13-23.
39. Gottfredson, L. (1997b). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79-132.
40. Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). Where and why g matters: Not a mystery. Human Performance, 15, 25-46.
41. Guion, R. M., & Gottier, R. F. (1965). Validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 18, 135-164.
42. Haier, R. J. (2003). Brain imaging studies of intelligence: Individual differences and neurobiology. In R. J. Sternberg, J. Lautrey, & T. I. Lubart (Eds.), Models of intelligence: International perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
43. Heit, E., & Rotello, C. M. (2010). Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 805-812.
44. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York, NY: Free Press.
45. Higgins, D. M., Peterson, J. B., Pihl, R. O., & Lee, A. G. (2007). Prefrontal cognitive ability, intelligence, big five personality, and the prediction of advanced academic and workplace performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 298-319.
46. Horn, J. L. (1976). Human abilities: A review of research and theory in the early 1970s. Annual Review of Psychology, 27, 437-485.
47. Horn, J. L., & Blankson, N. (2005). Foundations for better understanding of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 41-68). New York, NY: Guilford.
48. Hunter, J. E. (1980). Test validation for 12, 000 jobs: An application of synthetic validity and validity generalization to the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB). Washington, DC: U.S. Employment Service.
49. Hunter, J. E. (1986). Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitude, job knowledge, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 340-362.
50. Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98.
51. Irvine, S. H., & Kyllonen, P. C. (Eds.). (2002). Item generation and test development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Jeanneret, R. (1998). Ethical, legal, and professional issues for individual assessment. In R. Jeanneret & R. Silzer (Eds.), Individual psychological assessment: Predicting behavior in organizational settings. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
53. Jensen, A. R. (1985). The nature of the black-white difference on various psychometric tests: Spearman's hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 193-263.
54. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
55. Jensen, A. R. (2000). Testing: The dilemma of group differences. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 6, 121-128.
56. Jensen, A. R. (2006). Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences. New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
57. Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47-70.
58. Kaufman, A. S. (2000). Tests of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 445-476). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
59. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1983). Kaufman Assessment Battery for children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
60. Kehoe, J. F. (2002). General mental ability and selection in private sector organizations: A commentary. Human Performance, 15, 97-106.
61. Kuhn, T. (1959). The essential tension: Tradition and innovation in scientific research. In C. Taylor (Ed.), The third University of Utah research conference on the identification of scientific talent (pp. 225-239). Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.
62. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
63. Kyllonen, P. C. (1996). Is working memory capacity Spearman's g? In I. Dennis & P. Tapsfield (Eds.), Human abilities: Their nature and measurement (pp. 49-76). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Landy, F. J. (1989). Psychology of work behavior (4th ed.) Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole.
65. Latham, G. P., Erez, M., & Locke, E. A. (1988). Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments: Application to the Erez-Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology (Monograph), 73, 753-777.
66. Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Situational judgment tests in high stakes settings: Issues and strategies with generating alternate forms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1043-1055.
67. Mayer, R. E. (2000). Intelligence and education. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 519-533). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
68. McDaniel, M. A., Kepes, S., & Banks, G. (2011). The Uniform Guidelines are a detriment to the field of personnel selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 566-570.
69. McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities: Past, present, and future. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 136-182). New York, NY: Guilford.
70. McGrew, K. S., & Evans, J. (2004). Carroll Human Cognitive Abilities Project: Research Report No. 2. Internal and external factorial extensions to the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory of cognitive abilities: A review of factor analytic research since Carroll's seminal 1993 treatise. St. Cloud, MN: Institutes of Applied Psychometrics.
71. McHenry, J. J., Hough, L. M., Toquam, J. L., Hanson, M. A., & Ashworth, S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and criterion domains. Personnel Psychology, 43, 335-354.
72. Murphy, K., Cronin, B., & Tam, A. (2003). Controversy and consensus regarding the use of cognitive ability testing in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 660-671.
73. Murphy, K. R. (1996). Individual differences and behavior in organizations: Much more than g. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations (pp. 3-30). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
74. Naglieri, J. A. (2005). The cognitive assessment system. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 441-460). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
75. Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997). Intelligence revised. In R. Dillon (Ed.), Handbook on testing (pp. 136-163). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
76. Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (2005). Planning, attention, simultaneous, successive (PASS) theory: A revision of the concept of intelligence. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 120-135). New York, NY: Guilford.
77. Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77-101.
78. Offermann, L. R., & Gowing, M. K. (1993). Personnel selection in the future: The impact of changing demographics and the nature of work. In N. Schmitt & W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 385-417). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
79. Outtz, J. L., & Newman, D. A. (2009). A theory of adverse impact. In J. Outtz (Ed.), Adverse impact: Implications for organizational staffing and high stakes testing (pp. 53-93). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
80. Pearlman, K., & Barney, M. F. (2000). Selection for a changing workplace. In J. F. Kehoe (Ed.), Managing selection in changing organizations: Human resource strategies (pp. 3-72). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
81. Prabhakaran, V., Narayanan, K., Zhao, Z., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2000). Integration of diverse information in working memory within the frontal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 85-90.
82. Pulakos, E. D., Dorsey, D. W., & Borman, W. C. (2003). Hiring for knowledge-based competition. In S. E. Jackson, M. A. Hitt, & A. S. DeNisi (Eds.), Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage (pp. 155-177). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
83. Ree, M. J., & Carretta, T. R. (2002). g2K. Human Performance, 15, 3-24.
84. Ree, M. J., & Carretta, T. R. (2007). Tests of cognitive ability. In D. L. Whetzel & G. R. Wheaton (Eds.), Applied measurement: Industrial psychology in human resources management (pp. 131-159). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis/Erlbaum.
85. Ree, M. J., Carretta, T. R., & Teachout, M. S. (1994). Predicting job performance: Not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 518-524.
86. Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1991). Predicting training success: Not much more than g. Personnel Psychology, 44, 321-332.
87. Reeve, C. L., & Hakel, M. D. (2002). Asking the right questions about g. Human Performance, 15, 47-74.
88. Sackett, P. R., Schmitt, N., Ellingson, J. E., & Kabin, M. B. (2001). High-stakes testing in employment, credentialing, and higher education: Prospects in a post-affirmative-action world. American Psychologist, 56, 302-318.
89. Schmidt, F. (2002). The role of general cognitive ability and job performance: Why there cannot be a debate. Human Performance, 15, 187-210.
90. Schmidt, F. (2011). An interview with Frank Schmidt. The Industrial and Organizational Psychologist, 48, 21-29.
91. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1981). Employment testing: Old theories and new research findings. American Psychologist, 36, 1128-1137.
92. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
93. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday Currency.
94. Spearman, C. E. (1904). "General intelligence" objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201-293.
95. Sternberg, R. J. (1981). Intelligence and non-entrenchment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 1-16.
96. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
97. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York, NY: Plume.
98. Sternberg, R. J. (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 292-316.
99. Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2000). Handbook of intelligence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
100. Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical, and creative skills. Intelligence, 34, 321-350.
101. Sternberg, R. J., & Detterman, D. K. (1986). What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
102. Tenopyr, M. L. (2002). Theory versus reality: Evaluation of g in the workplace. Human Performance, 15, 107-122.
103. Thorndike, R. M. (1959). Personnel selection. New York, NY: Wiley.
104. Thorndike, R. M. (1997). The early history of intelligence testing. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. Chicago, IL: Riverside.
105. Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth edition. Guide for administering and scoring. Chicago, IL: Riverside.
106. Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
107. Vernon, P. A., Wickett, J. C., Bazana, P. G., & Stelmack, R. M. (2000). The neuropsychology and psychophysiology of human intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 245-266). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
108. Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. (2002). Agreements and disagreements on the role of general mental ability (GMA) in industrial, work, and organizational psychology. Human Performance, 15, 212-231.
109. Wagner, J., & Hollenbeck, J. (1998). Organizational behavior: Securing competitive advantage. Upper Saddle Ridge, NJ: Erlbaum.
110. Wasserman, J. D., & Tulsky, D. S. (2005). A history of intelligence assessment. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 3-22). New York, NY: Guilford.
111. Wechsler, D. (1975). Intelligence defined and undefined: A relativistic appraisal. American Psychologist, 30, 135-139.
112. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery Revised Tests of Achievement: Standard and supplemental batteries. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
113. Zu, J., & Weiss, L. (2005). The Wechsler scales. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 297-324). New York, NY: Guilford.