Electromagnetic navigation platform for endovascular surgery: How to develop sensorized catheters and guidewires

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 300-310

  Condino, S ^a   Ferrari, V ^a   Freschi, C ^a   Alberti, A ^a   Berchiolli, R ^a   Mosca, F ^a   Ferrari, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Electromagnetic localization; Endovascular instruments sensorization; Endovascular surgery; Surgical navigation

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIA; PLANNING; SURGERY;

2D IMAGES; CONTRAST MEDIUM; ELECTROMAGNETIC LOCALIZATION; ELECTROMAGNETICS; ENDOVASCULAR; ENDOVASCULAR INSTRUMENT SENSORIZATION; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; GUIDEWIRES; SURGICAL NAVIGATION;

CATHETERS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ACCURACY; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER MODEL; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ELECTROMAGNETIC NAVIGATION PLATFORM; ELECTROMAGNETIC NAVIGATOR; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; EVALUATION; GUIDE WIRE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PHANTOM; RADIATION DOSE; SENSOR; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL ROTATIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY;

EID: 84865383687     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1417     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Jones C, Badger SA, Boyd CS, Soong CV. The impact of radiation dose exposure during endovascular aneurysm repair on patient safety. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52(2): 298-302.
2. Walsh SR, Tang T, Gaunt ME, Boyle JR. Contrast-induced nephropathy. J Endovasc Therapy 2007; 14(1): 92-100.
3. Da L, Zhang D, Wang T. Overview of the vascular interventional robot. Int J Med Robot 2008; 4(4): 289-294.
4. Fu Y, Liu H, Huang W, et al. Steerable catheters in minimally invasive vascular surgery. Int J Med Robot 2009; 5(4): 381-391.
5. French PJ, Tanase D, Goosen JFL. Sensors for catheter applications. Sensors Update 2003; 13: 107-153.
6. Tercero C, Ikeda S, Uchiyama T, et al. Autonomous catheter insertion system using magnetic motion capture sensor for endovascular surgery. Int J Med Robot Comput 2007; 3(1): 52-58.
7. Lee JD, Chien TA, Huang CH, et al. A Navigation system of cerebral endovascular surgery integrating multiple space-guiding trackers. 30th Annual International IEEE EMBS Conference; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, August 20-24 2008.
8. Pujol S, Frerichs K, Norbash A, et al. Preliminary results of nonfluoroscopy-based 3D navigation for neurointerventional procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 18(2): 289-298.
9. Dimitrov K. 3-D Hall Sensor for use in navigation systems for surgery endovascular interventions. IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications; 6-8 September Dortmund, Germany 2007.
10. Feuerstein M, Filippatos K, Kutter O, et al. A novel segmentation and navigation tool for endovascular stenting of aortic aneurysms. Int J CARS 2006; 1(1): S280-S282.
11. Kuttera O, Kettnerb S, Brauna E, et al. Towards an integrated planning and navigation system for aortic stent-graft placement. Int J CARS 2007; 2(Suppl 1): S239-S241.
12. Castro M, Göksu C, Haigron P, et al. Estimation of 2d/3d rigid transformation of computer-assisted endovascular navigation. International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications, ICCTA 7-11 April; Damascus, Syria, pp 1-6, 2008.
13. Pujol S, Pecher M, et al. A virtual reality based navigation system for endovascular surgery. Stud Health Technol Inf 2004; 98: 310-312.
14. CARTO® System, Biosense Webster® Available from: http://www.biosensewebster.com.
15. EP Navigator, Philips Electronics N.V.; Available from: http://www.healthcare.philips.com.
16. EnSite System™, St. Jude Medical. Available from: http://www.sjmprofessional.com.
17. Olbricha B, Traubb J, Wiesnerb S, et al. Respiratory motion analysis: towards gated augmentation of the liver. International Congress Series 2005; 1281: 248-253.
18. Blackall JM, Ahmad S, Miquel ME, et al. MRI-based measurements of respiratory motion variability and assessment of imaging strategies for radiotherapy planning. Phys Med Biol 2006; 51(17): 4147-4169.
19. McClelland JR, Blackall JM, Tarte S, et al. A continuous 4D motion model from multiple respiratory cycles for use in lung radiotherapy. Med Phys 2006; 33(9): 3348-3358.
20. Gupta A, Radaelli A. Live 3D guidance in endovascular procedures. Endovasc Today July 2009: 28-40.
21. Tsapaki V, Vano E, Muavrikou I, et al. Comparison of patient dose in two-dimensional carotid arteriography and three-dimensional rotational angiography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2008; 31(3): 477-482.
22. Schueler BA, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ. 3D cerebral angiography: radiation dose comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26(8): 1898-1901.
23. Megali G, Ferrari V, Freschi C, et al. EndoCAS navigator platform: a common platform for computer and robotic assistance in minimally invasive surgery. Int J Med Robot Comput 2008; 4(3): 242-2 51.
24. Ferrari V, Cappelli C, Megali G, Pietrabissa A. An anatomy driven approach for generation of 3D models from multi-phase CT images. Proceedings of CARS, 2008; 3.
25. NDI Aurora® System Available from: http://www.ndigital.com/medical/aurora.php.
26. OpenSG. Available from: http://www.opensg.org/.
27. Qt, Nokia. Available from: http://qt.nokia.com/.
28. Advanced Polymers I. Available from: www.advpoly.com.
29. POLYDIAGNOST GmbH. Available from: http://www.polydiagnost.com
30. Khoynezhad A, Kruse MJ. Guidewires, catheters, and sheaths used for thoracic endografting procedures. J Cardiac Surg 2009; 24(2): 113-119.
31. Fort Wayne Metals. Available from: http://www.fwmetals.com/.
32. Arun KS, Huang TS, Blostein SD. Least-squares fitting of 2 3-D point sets. IEEE T Pattern Anal 1987; 9(5): 699-700.
33. Ma Y, Penney GP, Bos D, et al. Evaluation of a robotic arm for echocardiography to X-ray image registration during cardiac catheterization procedures. Conference Proceedings, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2009; 5829-5832.
34. Dimension Elite, Stratasys Inc.; Available from: http://www.dimensionprinting.com.
35. Condino S, Carbone M, Ferrari V, et al. (eds.). (eds)Fabrication strategy to build a patient specific physical simulators for endovascular training. Int J CARS 2011; 6(1): S226-S295.
36. Nafis C, Jensen V, von Jako R, (eds). Method for evaluating compatibility of commercial electromagnetic (EM) microsensor tracking systems with surgical and imaging tables. Medical Imaging 2008: Visualization, Image-guided Procedures, and Modeling; Sunday 17 February 2008; San Diego, CA, USA SPIE, 2008.
37. Pennington N, Soames RW. The anterior visceral branches of the abdominal aorta and their relationship to the renal arteries. Surg Radiol Anat 2005; 27(5): 395-403.
38. Ruijters D, Babic D, Homan R, et al. Real-time integration of 3-D multimodality data in interventional neuroangiography. J Electron Imaging 2009; 18(3). doi: 10.1117/1.3222939.