Plan ahead: Pricing ITS learner models

19th Annual Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation 2010, BRiMS 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 221-228

  Folsom Kovarik, Jeremiah T ^a   Schatz, Sae ^a   Nicholson, Denise ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Development costs; Intelligent tutoring systems; Learner models

Indexed keywords

COST INFORMATION; DEVELOPMENT COSTS; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; LEARNER MODEL; PUBLISHED ACCOUNTS;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION;

COSTS;

EID: 84865340649     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., Sewall, J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2006). The cognitive tutor authoring tools (CTAT): Preliminary evaluation of efficiency gains. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Arroyo, I, Woolf, B. P., & Beal, C. R. (2006). Addressing cognitive differences and gender during problem solving. Technology, Instruction, Cognition & Learning, 4, 31-63.
4. Baker, R. S. J., Corbett, A. T., & Aleven, V. (2008). More Accurate Student Modeling Through Contextual Estimation of Slip and Guess Probabilities in Bayesian Knowledge Tracing. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
5. Brown, J. S., & VanLehn, K. (1980). Repair theory: A generative theory of bugs in procedural skills. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 4(4), 379-426.
6. Burton, R. R. (1982). Diagnosing bugs in a simple procedural skill. In D. Sleeman & J. S. Brown (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 157-183). London: Academic Press.
7. Burton, R. R., & Brown, J. S. (1976). A tutoring and student modelling paradigm for gaming environments. Paper presented at the SIGCSE-SIGCUE joint symposium on Computer science education.
8. Carbonell, J. (1970). AI in CAI: An artificial-intelligence approach to computer-assisted instruction. IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, 11(4), 190-202.
9. Carr, B. P. B. (1977). Wusorll: A Computer Aided Instruction Program with Student Modelling Capabilities. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
10. Castellano, M., Mastronardi, G., Di Giuseppe, G., & Dicensi, V. (2007). Neural Techniques to Improve the Formative Evaluation Procedure in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Measurement Systems and Applications.
11. Cha, H. J, Kim, Y. S., Park, S. H., Yoon, T. B., Jung, Y. M., & Lee, J. (2006). Learning styles diagnosis based on user interface behaviors for the customization of learning interfaces in an intelligent tutoring system. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
12. Conati, C, & Maclaren, H. (2005). Data-driven refinement of a probabilistic model of user affect. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on User Modeling.
13. Conati, C, & Zhou, X. (2004). Building and evaluating an intelligent pedagogical agent to improve the effectiveness of an educational game. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces.
14. Corbett, A. T., & Bhatnagar, A. (1997). Student Modeling in the ACT Programming Tutor: Adjusting a Procedural Learning Model With Declarative Knowledge. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on User Modeling, from um.org
15. Folsom-Kovarik, J. T., Schatz, S., & Nicholson, D. (in preparation). Return on investment: A practical review of ITS student modeling techniques. Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida.
16. Hatzilygeroudis, I., & Prentzas, J. (2004). Using a hybrid rule-based approach in developing an intelligent tutoring system with knowledge acquisition and update capabilities. Expert Systems with Applications, 26(4), 411-492.
17. Johnson, W. L. (1990). Understanding and debugging novice programs. Artificial Intelligence, 42, 51-97. (Pubitemid 20660175)
18. Kodaganallur, V., Weitz, R. R., & Rosenthal, D. (2005). A comparison of model-tracing and constraint-based intelligent tutoring paradigms. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15(2), 117-144.
19. Koedinger, K. R., Aleven, V., Heffernan, N., McLaren, B., & Hockenberry, M. (2004). Opening the door to non-programmers: authoring intelligent tutor behavior by demonstration. Paper presented at the 7th Annual Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference.
20. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8(1), 30-47.
21. Lee, C. S. (2007). Diagnostic, predictive and compositional modeling with data mining in integrated learning environments. Computers & Education, 49(3), 562-580.
22. Luckin, R., & du Boulay, B. (1999). Ecolab: The development and evaluation of a Vygotskian design framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10(2), 198-220.
23. Martin, B., & Mitrovic, A. (2002). Automatic problem generation in constraint-based tutors. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
24. Martin, B., Mitrovic, A., & Suraweera, P. (2008). ITS domain modelling with ontology. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 74(17), 2758-2776.
25. McQuiggan, S. W, Mott, B. W., & Lester, J. C. (2008). Modeling self-efficacy in intelligent tutoring systems: An inductive approach. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 75(1), 81-123.
26. Mitrovic, A., Koedinger, K. R., & Martin, B. (2003). A comparative analysis of cognitive tutoring and constraint-based modeling. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on User Modeling.
27. Mitrovic, A., & Ohlsson, S. (1999). Evaluation of a constraint-based tutor for a database language. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 70(3-4), 238-256.
28. Mitrovic, A., Suraweera, P., Martin, B., Zakharov, K., Milik, N., & Holland, J. (2006). Authoring constraint-based tutors in ASPIRE. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
29. Neches, R., Langley, P., & Klahr, D. (1987). Learning, development, and production systems. In D. Klahr, P. Langley & R. Neches (Eds.), Production system models of learn- ing and development (pp. 1-53). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Ohlsson, S. (1992). Constraint-based student modeling. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 5(4), 429-447.
31. Ott, S., Imoto, S., & Miyano, S. (2004). Finding optimal models for small gene networks. Paper presented at the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.
32. Payne, S. J., & Squibb, H. R. (1990). Algebra mal-rules and cognitive accounts of error. Cognitive Science: A Multi-disciplinary Journal, 14(3), 445-481.
33. Razzaq, L., Patvarczki, J., Almeida, S. F., Vartak, M., Feng, M., Heffernan, N. T., et al. (2008). The ASSISTment Builder: Supporting the Life Cycle of ITS Content Creation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2(2), 157-166.
34. Snow, R. E., & Swanson, J. (1992). Instructional psychology: Aptitude, adaptation, and assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 43(1), 583-626.
35. Startler, R. H., Fu, D., Ramachandran, S., & Vinkavich, M. (2001). Applying a Generic Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) Authoring Tool to Specific Military Domains. Paper presented at the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation & Education Conference.
36. Suraweera, P., Mitrovic, A., & Martin, B. (2007). Constraint Authoring System: an empirical evaluation. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education.
37. VanLehn, K. (1982). Bugs are not enough: Empirical studies of bugs, impasses and repairs in procedural skills. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 3(2), 3-71.
38. Walonoski, J. A., & Heffernan, N. T. (2006). Detection and analysis of off-task gaming behavior in intelligent tutoring systems. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems.