Heterochronically early decline of Hox expression prior to cartilage formation in the avian hindlimb zeugopod

Development Growth and Differentiation

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 619-632

  Kamiyama, Namiko ^a   Seki, Ryohei ^a   Yokoyama, Hitoshi ^a   Tamura, Koji ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Diversity; Hox; Limb; Morphology; Pattern

Indexed keywords

HOX PROTEIN; HOXD11 PROTEIN; HOXD12 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIRD; BONE STRUCTURE; CARTILAGE; CHICK; EMBRYO; FIBULA; GENE EXPRESSION; HINDLIMB; LIMB BUD; LIMB DEVELOPMENT; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; ZEUGOPOD;

ANIMALS; CARTILAGE; CHICK EMBRYO; CHICKENS; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FIBULA; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HINDLIMB; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; LIMB BUDS; MESODERM; MICE; REPTILES; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

AVES; GEKKONIDAE; TETRAPODA;

EID: 84865288423     PISSN: 00121592     EISSN: 1440169X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2012.01359.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Archer, C. W., Hornbruch, A. & Wolpert, L. 1983. Growth and morphogenesis of the fibula in the chick embryo. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 75, 101-116.
2. Beckers, J., Gerard, M. & Duboule, D. 1996. Transgenic analysis of a potential Hoxd-11 limb regulatory element present in tetrapods and fish. Dev. Biol. 180, 543-553.
3. Boulet, A. M. & Capecchi, M. R. 2004. Multiple roles of Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 in the formation of the mammalian forelimb zeugopod. Development 131, 299-309.
4. Chimal-Monroy, J., Rodriguez-Leon, J., Montero, J. A., Ganan, Y., Macias, D., Merino, R. & Hurle, J. M. 2003. Analysis of the molecular cascade responsible for mesodermal limb chondrogenesis: Sox genes and BMP signaling. Dev. Biol. 257, 292-301.
5. Dahn, R. D. & Fallon, J. F. 2000. Interdigital regulation of digit identity and homeotic transformation by modulated BMP signaling. Science 289, 438-441.
6. Davis, A. P. & Capecchi, M. R. 1994. Axial homeosis and appendicular skeleton defects in mice with a targeted disruption of hoxd-11. Development 120, 218, 7-2198.
7. Davis, A. P. & Capecchi, M. R. 1996. A mutational analysis of the 5′ HoxD genes: dissection of genetic interactions during limb development in the mouse. Development 122, 1175-1185.
8. Davis, A. P., Witte, D. P., Hsieh-Li, H. M., Potter, S. S. & Capecchi, M. R. 1995. Absence of radius and ulna in mice lacking hoxa-11 and hoxd-11. Nature 375, 791-795.
9. Duboule, D. 1995. Vertebrate Hox genes and proliferation: an alternative pathway to homeosis? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5, 525-528.
10. Gerard, M., Zakany, J. & Duboule, D. 1997. Interspecies exchange of a Hoxd enhancer in vivo induces premature transcription and anterior shift of the sacrum. Dev. Biol. 190, 32-40.
11. Goff, D. J. & Tabin, C. J. 1997. Analysis of Hoxd-13 and Hoxd-11 misexpression in chick limb buds reveals that Hox genes affect both bone condensation and growth. Development 124, 627-636.
12. Graham, A. 1994. Developmental patterning. The Hox code out on a limb. Curr. Biol. 4, 1135-1137.
13. Haack, H. & Gruss, P. 1993. The establishment of murine Hox-1 expression domains during patterning of the limb. Dev. Biol. 157, 410-422.
14. Hamburger, V. & Hamilton, H. L. 1951. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J. Morphol. 88, 49-92.
15. Hampe, A. 1960. The competition between the osseous elements of the zeugopod of the chicken. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 8, 241-245.
16. Herault, Y., Beckers, J., Kondo, T., Fraudeau, N. & Duboule, D. 1998. Genetic analysis of a Hoxd-12 regulatory element reveals global versus local modes of controls in the HoxD complex. Development 125, 1669-1677.
17. Izpisua-Belmonte, J. C., Tickle, C., Dolle, P., Wolpert, L. & Duboule, D. 1991. Expression of the homeobox Hox-4 genes and the specification of position in chick wing development. Nature 350, 585-589.
18. Kawakami, Y., Tsuda, M., Takahashi, S., Taniguchi, N., Esteban, C. R., Zemmyo, M., Furumatsu, T., Lotz, M., Belmonte, J. C. & Asahara, H. 2005. Transcriptional coactivator PGC-1alpha regulates chondrogenesis via association with Sox9. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2414-2419.
19. Koyama, E., Yasuda, T., Wellik, D. M. & Pacifici, M. 2010. Hox11 paralogous genes are required for formation of wrist and ankle joints and articular surface organization. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1192, 307-316.
20. Logan, M. & Tabin, C. J. 1999. Role of Pitx1 upstream of Tbx4 in specification of hindlimb identity. Science 283, 1736-1739.
21. Mackem, S. & Mahon, K. A. 1991. Ghox 4.7: a chick homeobox gene expressed primarily in limb buds with limb-type differences in expression. Development 112, 791-806.
22. Mackem, S., Ranson, M. & Mahon, K. 1993. Limb-type differences in expression domains of certain chick Hox-4 genes and relationship to pattern modification for flight. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 383A, 21-30.
23. Morgan, B. A., Izpisua-Belmonte, J. C., Duboule, D. & Tabin, C. J. 1992. Targeted misexpression of Hox-4.6 in the avian limb bud causes apparent homeotic transformations. Nature 358, 236-239.
24. Müller, G. B. & Streicher, J. 1989. Ontogeny of the syndesmosis tibiofibularis and the evolution of the bird hindlimb: a caenogenetic feature triggers phenotypic novelty. Anat Embryol (Berl) 179, 327-339.
25. Nelson, C. E., Morgan, B. A., Burke, A. C., Laufer, E., Dimambro, E., Murtaugh, L. C., Gonzales, E., Tessarollo, L., Parada, L. F. & Tabin, C. 1996. Analysis of Hox gene expression in the chick limb bud. Development 122, 1449-1466.
26. Nohno, T., Noji, S., Koyama, E., Ohyama, K., Myokai, F., Kuroiwa, A., Saito, T. & Taniguchi, S. 1991. Involvement of the Chox-4 chicken homeobox genes in determination of anteroposterior axial polarity during limb development. Cell 64, 1197-1205.
27. Noro, M., Uejima, A., Abe, G., Manabe, M. & Tamura, K. 2009. Normal developmental stages of the Madagascar ground gecko Paroedura pictus with special reference to limb morphogenesis. Dev. Dyn. 238, 100-109.
28. Papenbrock, T., Visconti, R. P. & Awgulewitsch, A. 2000. Loss of fibula in mice overexpressing Hoxc11. Mech. Dev. 92, 113-123.
29. Peterson, R. L., Papenbrock, T., Davda, M. M. & Awgulewitsch, A. 1994. The murine Hoxc cluster contains five neighboring AbdB-related Hox genes that show unique spatially coordinated expression in posterior embryonic subregions. Mech. Dev. 47, 253-260.
30. Riddle, R. D., Johnson, R. L., Laufer, E. & Tabin, C. 1993. Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell 75, 1401-1416.
31. Rodriguez-Esteban, C., Tsukui, T., Yonei, S., Magallon, J., Tamura, K. & Izpisua Belmonte, J. C. 1999. The T-box genes Tbx4 and Tbx5 regulate limb outgrowth and identity. Nature 398, 814-818.
32. Sakamoto, K., Onimaru, K., Munakata, K., Suda, N., Tamura, M., Ochi, H. & Tanaka, M. 2009. Heterochronic shift in Hox-mediated activation of sonic hedgehog leads to morphological changes during fin development. PLoS ONE 4, e5121.
33. Sato, K., Koizumi, Y., Takahashi, M., Kuroiwa, A. & Tamura, K. 2007. Specification of cell fate along the proximal-distal axis in the developing chick limb bud. Development 134, 1397-1406.
34. Scherz, P. J., Harfe, B. D., Mcmahon, A. P. & Tabin, C. J. 2004. The limb bud Shh-Fgf feedback loop is terminated by expansion of former ZPA cells. Science 305, 396-399.
35. Schneider, I., Aneas, I., Gehrke, A. R., Dahn, R. D., Nobrega, M. A. & Shubin, N. H. 2011. Appendage expression driven by the Hoxd Global Control Region is an ancient gnathostome feature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12782-12786.
36. Shapiro, M. D., Hanken, J. & Rosenthal, N. 2003. Developmental basis of evolutionary digit loss in the Australian lizard Hemiergis. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 297, 48-56.
37. Sheth, R., Bastida, M. F. & Ros, M. 2007. Hoxd and Gli3 interactions modulate digit number in the amniote limb. Dev. Biol. 310, 430-441.
38. Small, K. M. & Potter, S. S. 1993. Homeotic transformations and limb defects in Hox A11 mutant mice. Genes Dev. 7, 2318-2328.
39. Spitz, F., Gonzalez, F., Peichel, C., Vogt, T. F., Duboule, D. & Zakany, J. 2001. Large scale transgenic and cluster deletion analysis of the HoxD complex separate an ancestral regulatory module from evolutionary innovations. Genes Dev. 15, 2209-2214.
40. Suzuki, M. & Kuroiwa, A. 2002. Transition of Hox expression during limb cartilage development. Mech. Dev. 118, 241-245.
41. Tabin, C. J. 1992. Why we have (only) five fingers per hand: hox genes and the evolution of paired limbs. Development 116, 289-296.
42. Takeuchi, J. K., Koshiba-Takeuchi, K., Matsumoto, K., Vogel-Hopker, A., Naitoh-Matsuo, M., Ogura, K., Takahashi, N., Yasuda, K. & Ogura, T. 1999. Tbx5 and Tbx4 genes determine the wing/leg identity of limb buds. Nature 398, 810-814.
43. Tamura, K., Yonei-Tamura, S., Yano, T., Yokoyama, H. & Ide, H. 2008. The autopod: its formation during limb development. Dev. Growth Differ. 50(Suppl. 1), S177-S187.
44. Wellik, D. M. & Capecchi, M. R. 2003. Hox10 and Hox11 genes are required to globally pattern the mammalian skeleton. Science 301, 363-367.
45. Yokouchi, Y., Nakazato, S., Yamamoto, M., Goto, Y., Kameda, T., Iba, H. & Kuroiwa, A. 1995. Misexpression of Hoxa-13 induces cartilage homeotic transformation and changes cell adhesiveness in chick limb buds. Genes Dev. 9, 2509-2522.
46. Yokouchi, Y., Sasaki, H. & Kuroiwa, A. 1991. Homeobox gene expression correlated with the bifurcation process of limb cartilage development. Nature 353, 443-445.
47. Yonei-Tamura, S., Endo, T., Yajima, H., Ohuchi, H., Ide, H. & Tamura, K. 1999. FGF7 and FGF10 directly induce the apical ectodermal ridge in chick embryos. Dev. Biol. 211, 133-143.
48. Yonei, S., Tamura, K., Ohsugi, K. & Ide, H. 1995. MRC-5 cells induce the AER prior to the duplicated pattern formation in chick limb bud. Dev. Biol. 170, 542-552.
49. Yoshida, N., Urase, K., Takahashi, J., Ishii, Y. & Yasugi, S. 1996. Mucus-associated antigen in epithelial cells of the chicken digestive tract: Developmental change in expression and implications for morphogenesis-function relationships. Dev. Growth Differ. 38, 185-192.