Biomass characterization: Recent progress in understanding biomass recalcitrance

Industrial Biotechnology

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 191-208

  Foston, Marcus ^a   Ragauskas, Arthur J ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

bioethanol; biomass characterization; biomass recalcitrance

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL METHOD; BIOLOGICAL CONVERSION; BIOMASS RECALCITRANCES; BIOMASS STRUCTURE; CELL WALL POLYSACCHARIDES; CO-PRODUCTS; COMPLEX NATURE; COST REQUIREMENTS; DEGRADING ENZYMES; ECONOMIC STABILITY; FERMENTABLE SUGARS; GLOBAL DEMAND; HIGH POTENTIAL; KNOWLEDGE GAPS; LARGE-SCALE PRODUCTION; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; MOLECULAR FEATURE; OPERATING CONDITION; PETROLEUM FEEDSTOCK; RECENT PROGRESS; SELECTIVE PRODUCTION; TECHNICAL ADVANCEMENT; THERMO CHEMICAL PROCESS; TRANSPORTATION FUELS;

BIOETHANOL; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; ETHANOL; PETROLEUM TRANSPORTATION; SUGARS;

BIOMASS;

EID: 84865228479     PISSN: 15509087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/ind.2012.0015     Document Type: Review

References (159)

1. Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, et al. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 2006;311(5760):484-489. (Pubitemid 43158454)
2. Wyman CE. What is (and is not) vital to advancing cellulosic ethanol. Trends Biotechnol 2007;25(4):153-157. (Pubitemid 46413369)
3. Lynd L, Cushman JH, Nichols R, Wyman CE. Fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass. Science 1991;251(4999):1318-1323.
4. Hsu TA. Alcohol from cellulose. Chem Technol 1980;10(5):315-319.
5. Pu Y, Zhang D, Singh PM, Ragauskas AJ. The new forestry biofuels sector. Biofuel Bioprod Bior 2008;2:58-73.
6. Fengel F, Wegener G. Wood: Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reaction. New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter, 1984.
7. Atalla RH. Celluloses. In: Barton D, Meth-Cohn O, eds. Comprehensive Natural Products Chemistry. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 1999;3:529-598.
8. Lin SY, Dence CW. Methods in Lignin Chemistry. Berlin, Germany: SpringerVerlag, 1992.
9. Yang B, Dai Z, Ding S, Wyman CE. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass. Biofuels 2011;2(4):421-450.
10. Himmel M, Ruth MF, Wyamn CE. Cellulase for commodity products from cellulosic biomass. Curr Opin Biotech 1999;10:358-364. (Pubitemid 29373950)
11. Himmel M, Ding S, Johnson DK, et al. Biomass recalcitrance: Engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 2007;315:804-807.
12. Mansfield S, Mooney C, Saddler J. Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Prog 1999;15:804-816. (Pubitemid 29475619)
13. Fan L, Lee Y, Beardmore D. Mechanism of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Effects of major structural features of cellulose on enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 1980;22(1):177-199.
14. Puri V. Effect of crystallinity and degree of polymerization of cellulose on enzymatic saccharification. Biotechnol Bioeng 1984;26:1219-1222. (Pubitemid 14645991)
15. Zhang Y, Lynd L. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 2004;88: 797-824. (Pubitemid 40003769)
16. Foston M, Ragauskas AJ. Changes in lignocellulosic supramolecular and ultrastructure during dilute acid pretreatment of Populus and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenerg 2010;34(12):1885-1898.
17. 13C NMR study of the effect of steam explosion processes on wood composition and structure. J Wood Chem Technol 1985;5(2):159-188.
18. Zhu Z, Sathitsuksanoh N, Vinzant T, et al. Comparative study of corn stover pretreated by dilute acid and cellulose solvent-based lignocellulose fractionation: Enzymatic hydrolysis, supramolecular structure, and substrate accessibility. Biotechnol Bioeng 2009;103(4):715-724.
19. Grous W, Converse A, Grethlein H. Effect of steam explosion pretreatment on pore size and enzymatic hydrolysis of poplar. Enzyme Microb Technol 1986;8(5):274-280. (Pubitemid 16538956)
20. Joeh T, Ishizawa C, Davis M, et al. Cellulase digestibility of pretreated biomass is limited by cellulose accessibility. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007;98(1):112-122. (Pubitemid 47325828)
21. 2H NMR. Energy and Fuels 2010;24(10):5677-5685.
22. Chen F, Dixon RA. Lignin modification improves fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:759-761. (Pubitemid 47052188)
23. Chen L, Auh CK, Dowling P, et al. Improved forage digestibility of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) by transgenic down-regulation of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase. Plant Biotechnol J 2003;1:437-449.
24. Chen L, Auh CK, Dowling P, et al. Transgenic down-regulation of caffeic acid O-methyltransferase (COMT) led to improved digestibility in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). Funct Plant Biol 2004;31:235-245. (Pubitemid 38600962)
25. Fu C, Mielenz JR, Xiao X, et al. Genetic manipulation of lignin reduces recalcitrance and improves ethanol production from switchgrass. PNAS 2011;108(9):3803-3808.
26. Rubin EM. Genomics of cellulosic biofuels. Nature 2008;454:841-845.
27. Sewalt V, Ni W, Jung H, et al. Lignin impact on fiber degradation: Increased enzymatic digestibility of genetically engineered tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) stems reduced in lignin content. J Agric Food Chem 1997;45(5):1977- 1983. (Pubitemid 127485656)
28. Kumar P, Barrett D, Delwiche M, Stroeve P. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem Res 2009;48:3713-3729.
29. Wyman CE, Dale B, Elander R, et al. Coordinated development of leading biomass pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol 2005;96:1959-1966. (Pubitemid 41174565)
30. Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, et al. Comparative sugar recovery data from laboratory scale application of leading pretreatment technologies to corn stover. Bioresour Technol 2005;96:2026-2032. (Pubitemid 41174572)
31. Novaes E, Osorio L, Drost DR, et al. Quantitative genetic analysis of biomass and wood chemistry of Populus under different nitrogen levels. New Phytol 2009;182(4):878-890.
32. Studer M, DeMartini JD, Davis M, et al. Lignin content in natural Populus variants affects sugar release. PNAS 2011;108(15):6300-6305.
33. Studer MH, DeMartini JD, Brethauer S, et al. Engineering of a high-throughput screening system to identify cellulosic biomass, pretreatments, and enzyme formulations that enhance sugar release. Biotechnol Bioeng 2010;105(2):231-238.
34. Decker S, Brunecky R, Tucker M, et al. High-throughput screening techniques for biomass conversion. Bioenerg Res 2009;2:179-192.
35. Berlin A, Maximenko V, Bura R, et al. A rapid microassay to evaluate enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Bioeng 2005;93(5):880-886.
36. Selig MJ, Tucker MP, Sykes R, et al. Lignocellulose recalcitrance screening by intergrated high-throughput hydrothermal pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification. Ind Biotechnol 2010;6(2):104-111.
37. Studer MH, Simone B, DeMartini JD, et al. Co-hydrolysis of hydrothermal and dilute acid pretreated Populus slurries to support development of a high-throughput pretreatment system. Biotechnol Biofuel 2011;4(19):1-10.
38. Chundawat S, Balan V, Dale BE. High-throughput microplate technique for enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008;99(9):1281-1294. (Pubitemid 351548668)
39. Chen L, Rieter W, Wilson R, et al. A rapid method to screen for cell-wall mutants using discriminant analysis of Fourier transform infrared spectra. Plant J 1998;16(3):385-392.
40. Mouille G, Robin S, Lecomte M, et al. Classification and indentification of Arabidopsis cell wall mutants using Fourier-Transform InfraRed (FT-IR) microspectroscopy. Plant J 2003;35:393-404. (Pubitemid 36990641)
41. Robinson AR, Mansfield SD. Rapid analysis of poplar lignin monomer composition by a streamlined thioacidolysis procedure and near-infrared reflectance-based prediction modeling. Plant J 2009;58:706-714.
42. 1H NMR during the autohydrolysis of hardwoods. Bioresour Technol 2009;100:6398-6406.
43. 1H NMR spectroscopy and multivariate analysis as a technique for metabolite fingerprinting of Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry 2003;62:949-957. (Pubitemid 36262398)
44. Lerouxel O, Choo T, Seveno M, et al. Rapid structural phenotyping of plant cell wall mutants by enzymatic oligosaccharide fingerprinting. Plant Physiol 2002;130:1754-1763. (Pubitemid 36035173)
45. Ropartz D, Przybylski C, Gonnet F, et al. Performance evaluation on a wide set of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization matrices for the detection of oligosaccharides in a high-throughput mass spectrometric screening of carbohydrate depolymerizing enzymes. Rapid Commun Mass Sp 2011;25: 2059-2070.
46. Moller I, Sørensen I, Bernal AJ, et al. High-throughput mapping of cell-wall polymers within and between plants using novel microarrays. Plant J 2007;50:1118-1128. (Pubitemid 46904116)
47. Alonso-Simon A, Kristensen JB, Øbro J, et al. High-throughput microarray profiling of cell wall polymers during hydrothermal pre-treatment of wheat straw. Biotechnol Bioeng 2010;105(3):509-514.
48. Sykes R, Novaes E, Kirst M, et al. High-throughput screening of plant cell-wall compostion using pyrolysis molecular beam mass spectroscopy. In: Mielenz JR, ed. Biofuels: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology. New York: Humana Press, 2009:169-183.
49. Agblevor F, Evans R, Johnson K. Molecular-beam mass spectrometric analysis of lignocellulosics materials, herbaceous biomass. J Anal Appl Pyrol 1994;30: 125-144.
50. Evans R, Milne T. Molecular characterization of the pyrolysis of biomass. Fund Energ Fuels 1987;1(2):123-137.
51. Tuskan G, West D, Bradshaw HD, et al. Two high-throughput techniques for determining wood properties as part of a molecular genetics analysis of hybrid poplar and loblolly pine. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1999;77-79:55-65. (Pubitemid 29300442)
52. Sykes R, Kodrzycki B, Tuskan G, et al. Within tree variability of lignin composition in Populus. Wood Sci Technol 2008;42(8):649-666.
53. Kelley SS, Rowell R, Davis M, et al. Rapid analysis of the chemical composition of agricultural fibers using near infrared spectroscopy and pyrolysis molecular beam mass spectrometry. Biomass Bioenerg 2004;27:77-88. (Pubitemid 38484774)
54. Samuel R, Pu Y, Raman B, Ragauskas AJ. Structural characterization and comparison of switchgrass ball-milled lignin before and after dilute acid pretreatment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2010;162:62-74.
55. Selig MJ, Tucker MP, Law C, et al. High throughput determination of glucan and xylan fractions in lignocelluloses. Biotechnol Lett 2011;33:961-967.
56. DeMartini JD, Studer MH, Wyman CE. Small-scale and automatable high-throughput compositional analysis of biomass. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011;108(2):306-312.
57. Kong F, Engler C, Soltes E. Effects of cell-wall acetate, xylan backbone, and lignin on enzymatic hydrolysis of aspen wood. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2002;34-35(1):23-35.
58. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Biomass Research - Standard Biomass Analytical Procedures. Available at: www.nrel.gov/biomass/analytical- procedures.html (Last accessed June 2012).
59. Davis M. A rapid modified method for compostional carbohydrate analysis of lignocellulosics by high pH anion-exchange chromatrography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC/PAD). Wood Chem Technol 1998;18(2):235-252.
60. Hatfield RD, Grabber J, Ralph J, et al. Using the acetyl bromide assay to determine lignin concentrations in herbaceous plants: Some cautionary notes. J Agric Food Chem 1999;47:628-632. (Pubitemid 29185235)
61. Chang XF, Chandra R, Berleth T, Beatson R. Rapid, microscale, acetyl bromide-based method for high-throughput determination of lignin content in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Agric Food Chem 2008;56(16):6825-6834.
62. Kacurakova M, Capek P, Sasinkova V, et al. FT-IR study of plant cell wall model compounds: Pectic polysaccharides and hemicelluloses. Carbohyd Polym 2000;43:195-203.
63. Holtman K, Chang H, Kadla JF. Solution-state nuclear magnetic resonance study of the similarities between mill wood lignin and cellulolytic enzyme lignin. J Agric Food Chem 2004;52(4):720-726.
64. Lundquist K, Olsson T. NMR studies of lignins. 1. Signals due to protons in formyl groups. Acta Chem Scand 1977;B31:788.
65. 1H-NMR spectroscopic data for lignin model compounds. Acta Chem Scand 1979;B33:418.
66. 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Acta Chem Scand 1981;B35:497.
67. 1H) NMR Spectroscopy. In: Lin SY, Dence CW, eds. Methods in Lignin Chemistry. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992:242-249.
68. Robert D. Carbon-13 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrometry. In: Lin SY, Dence CW, eds. Methods in Lignin Chemistry. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992:250-269.
69. 13C NMR analysis of kraft lignins. Acta Chem Scand 1987;B41:541.
70. 19F-NMR spectroscopy for the quantitative analysis of carbonyl groups in lignin. Proceedings, Fifth European Workshop on Lignocellulosics and Pulp 1998:469.
71. Zawadzki M, Ragauskas AJ. Quantitative determination of quinone chromophores in isolated lignins. IPST Technical Paper Series 1999;815:1-28.
72. 31P NMR in biomass lignin and biofuel precursors characterization. Energ Environ Sci 2011;4:3154-3166.
73. 13C NMR spectroscopy. Carbohyd Res 2000;329:807-815. (Pubitemid 32056152)
74. Teleman A, Tenkanen M, Jacobs A, Dahlman O. Characterization of O-acetyl-(4-O-methylglucurono)xylan isolated from birch and beech. Carbohyd Res 2002;337:373-377. (Pubitemid 34155428)
75. Yang B, Wyman CE. Pretreatment: The key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol. Biofuel Bioprod Bior 2008;2:26-40.
76. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, et al. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 2005;96:673-686. (Pubitemid 39592889)
77. Yang B, Wyman CE. Effect of xylan and lignin removal by batch and flowthrough pretreatment on the enzymatic digestibility of corn stover cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 2004;6(1):88-95. (Pubitemid 38339395)
78. Liu C, Wyman CE. Impact of fluid velocity on hot water only pretreatment of corn stover in a flowthrough reactor. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2004;113-116:977-987. (Pubitemid 40063651)
79. Liu C, Wyman CE. The effect of flow rate of very dilute sulfuric acid on xylan, lignin, and total mass removal from corn stover. Ind Eng Chem Res 2004;43:2781-2788. (Pubitemid 38678549)
80. Liu C, Wyman CE. Partial flow of compressed-hot water through corn stover to enhance hemicellulose sugar recovery and enzymatic digestibility of cellulose. Bioresour Technol 2005;96:1978-1985. (Pubitemid 41174567)
81. DeMartini JD, Pattathil S, Avci Y, et al. Application of monoclonal antibodies to investigate plant cell wall deconstruction for biofuels production. Energ Envir Sci 2011;4:4332-4339.
82. Ziebell A, Gracom K, Katahira R, et al. Increase in 4-coumaryl alcohol units during lignification in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) alters the extractability and molecular weight of lignin. J Biol Chem 2010;285(50):38961- 38968.
83. Zhu X, Pattathil S, Mazumder K, et al. Virus-induced gene silencing offers a functional genomics platform for studying plant cell wall formation. Mol Plant 2010;3(5):818-833.
84. 6. Bioenerg Res 2008;1:56-66.
85. 5. Org Biomol Chem 2010;8:576-591.
86. Swatloski RP, Spear S, Holbrey J, et al. Dissolution of cellose with ionic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 2002;124:4974-4975. (Pubitemid 34495887)
87. Jiang N, Pu Y, Samuel R, Ragauskas AJ. Perdeuterated pyridinium molten salt (ionic liquid) for direct dissolution and NMR analysis of plant cell walls. Green Chem 2009;11:1762-1766.
88. Swatloski RP, Spear SK, Holbrey JD, Rogers RD. Dissolution of cellose with ionic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 2002;124:4974-4975. (Pubitemid 34495887)
89. Yelle D, Ralph J, Frihart C. Characterization of nonderivatized plant cell walls using high-resolution solution-state NMR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Chem 2008;46:508-517.
90. Foston M, Hubbell C, Samuel R, et al. Chemical, ultrastructural and supramolecular analysis of tension wood in Populus tremula x alba as a model substrate for reduced recalcitrance Energ Envir Sci 2011; (in press): DOI: 10.1039/c1ee02073k.
91. 1H correlation spectra of whole biomass in perdeuterated pyridinium chloride-DMSO system: An effective tool for evaluating pretreatment. Fuel 2011;90:2836-2842.
92. Samuel R, Foston M, Jaing N, et al. Structural changes in switchgrass lignin and hemicelluloses during pretreatments by NMR analysis. Polym Degrad Stabil 2011;96:2002-2009.
93. Mazumder K, York W. Structural analysis of arabinoxylans isolated from ball-milled switchgrass biomass. Carbohyd Res 2010;345:2183-2193.
94. Hallac B, Ragauskas AJ. Analyzing cellulose degree of polymerization and its relevancy to cellulosic ethanol. Biofuel Bioprod Bior 2011;5(2):215-225.
95. Del Rio LF, Chandra RP, Saddler JN. The ease of enzymatic hydrolysis of organosolv-pretreated softwoods. Bioresour Technol 2010;107:235-242.
96. Zhang Y, Lynd L. Determination of the number-average degree of polymerization of cellodextrins and cellulose with application to enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules 2005;6:1510-1515. (Pubitemid 40778612)
97. Hubbell C, Ragauskas AJ. Effect of acid-chlorite delignification on cellulose degree of polymerization Bioresour Technol 2010;101(19):7410-7415.
98. Timpa J. Application of universal calibration in gel permeation chromatography for molecular weight determinations of plant cell wall polymers: Cotton fiber. J Agric Food Chem 1991;39:270-275.
99. Emelsy A, Heywood R. On the kinetics of degradation of cellulose. Cellulose 1997;4(1):1-5.
100. 13C NMR analysis of cellulase treated bleached softwood kraft pulp. Carbohyd Res 2006;341:591-597. (Pubitemid 43323356)
101. Hall M, Bansal P, Lee JH, et al. Cellulose crystallinity - a key predictor of the enzymatic hydrolysis rate. FEBS 2010;277(6):1571-1582.
102. Lin S. Accessibility of cellulose: A critical review. Fibre Sci Technol 1972;5(4):303-314.
103. Wadsworth LC, Cuculo JA. Accessibilty and crystallinity of cellulose. In: Rowell RM, Young RA, eds. Modified Cellulosics. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1978:117-146.
104. Beecher J, Hunt C, Zhu JY. Tools for the characterization of biomass at the nanometer scale. In: Lucia L, Rojas O, eds. The Nanoscience and Technology of Renewable Biomaterials. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009:61-90.
105. Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, et al. Cellulose crystallinity index: Measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels 2010;3:10.
106. b from synchrotron x-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 2002;124:9074-9082. (Pubitemid 34847668)
107. a from synchrotron x-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125:14300-14306. (Pubitemid 37452368)
108. 13C NMR spectra of cellulose polymorphs. J Am Chem Soc 1980;109(6):3249-3250.
109. VanderHart DL, Atalla RH. Observations by high-resolution carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance of cellulose I related to morphology and crystal structure. Macromolecules 1981;14(3):570-574.
110. VanderHart DL, Atalla RH. Studies of microstructure in native celluloses using solid-state carbon-13 NMR. Macromolecules 1984;17(8):1465-1472.
111. VanderHart DL, Atalla RH. A composite of two distinct crystalline forms. Science 1984;223(4633):283-285.
112. Foston M, Hubbell C, Ragauskas AJ. Cellulose isolation methodology for NMR analysis of cellulose ultrastructure. Materials 2011;4:1985-2002.
113. b in lignocellulosic materials. Carbohyd Res 1994;261:119-131.
114. 13C-NMR spectroscopy applied to structure and interaction studies on cellulose I. Solid State Nucl Mag 1999;15:31-40. (Pubitemid 34867497)
115. 13C NMR spectroscopy. Carbohyd Res 1998;312:123-129. (Pubitemid 28515697)
116. 13C CP-MAS NMR. Carbohyd Polym 1999;40:115-124. (Pubitemid 30508732)
117. 13C-NMR study of cellulose structure in spruce wood and kraft pulp. Cellulose 2000;7:35-55.
118. Hult EL, Larsson PT, Iversen T. Cellulose fibril aggregation - an inherent property of kraft pulps. Polymer 2001;42:3309-3314.
119. 13C NMR signal strengths. Solid Stat Nucl Mag 1999;15:21-29. (Pubitemid 34867496)
120. 13C excitation and spin diffusion NMR to resolve spatial dimensions in plant cell walls. J Agric Food Chem 2012;60:1419-1427.
121. Suurnakki A, Li TQ, Burchert J, et al. Effect of enzymatic removal of xylan and glucomannanon pore size distribution of kraft fibers. Holzforschung 1997;51:27-33. (Pubitemid 127554802)
122. Maloney TC, Paulapuro H. Hydration and swelling of pulp fibers measured with differential scanning calorimetry. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 1981;13:31-36.
123. Ishizawa C, Davis M, Schell D, et al. Porosity and its effect on the digestibility of dilute sulfuric acid pretreated corn stover. J Agric Food Chem 2007;55:2575-2581. (Pubitemid 46623752)
124. Thompson D, Chen H, Grethlein H. Comparsion of pretreatment methods on the basis of available surface area. Bioresour Technol 1992;39:155-163.
125. Zhao H, Jones C, Baker G, et al. Regenerating cellulose from ionic liquids for an accelerated enzymatic hydrolysis. J Biotechnol 2009;139:47-54.
126. Felby C, Thygesen LG, Kristensen JB, et al. Cellulose-water interactions during enzymatic hydrolysis as studied by time domain NMR. Cellulose 2008;15:703-710.
127. 1H-NMR. Langmuir 2001;17:2694-2702. (Pubitemid 35330522)
128. Topgaard D, Söderman O. Changes of cellulose fiber wall structure during drying investigated using NMR self-diffusion and relaxation experiments. Cellulose 2002;9:139-147. (Pubitemid 35197811)
129. Pilate G, Chabbert B, Yoshinaga A, et al. Lignification and tension wood. C R Biol 2004;327:889-901. (Pubitemid 39549871)
130. Yoshida M, Ohta H, Yamamoto H, Okuyama T. Tensile growth stress and lignin distribution in the cell walls of yellow poplar, Liriodendron tulipifera Linn. Trees-Struct Funct 2002;16:457-464.
131. HjCel7A and fluorescence and FE-SEM microscopy. Holzforschung 2006;60:618-624. (Pubitemid 44898606)
132. Wada M, Okana T, Sugiyama J, Horii F. Characterization of tension and normally lignified wood cellulose in Populus maximowiczii. Cellulose 1995;2:223-233.
133. Tokareva EN, Fardim P, Pranovich AV, et al. Imaging of wood tissue by ToF-SIMS: Critical evaluation and development of sample preparation techniques. Appl Surf Sci 2007;253(18):7569-7577. (Pubitemid 46873798)
134. Saito K, Kato T, Tsuji Y. Identifying the characteristic secondary ions of lignin polymer using ToF-SIMS. Biomacromolecules 2005;6(2):678-683. (Pubitemid 40467809)
135. Goacher RE, Jeremic D, Master E. Expanding the library of secondary ions that distinguish lignin and polysaccharides in time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry analysis of wood. Anal Chem 2011;83(3):804-812.
136. Jung S, Foston M, Sullards MC, et al. Surface characterization of dilute acid pretreated Populus deltoides by ToF-SIMS. Energy Fuel 2010;24:1347-1357.
137. Zhou C, Li Q, Chiang V, et al. Chemical and spatial differentiation of syringyl and guaiacyl lignins poplar wood via time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2011;83:7020-7026.
138. Cornett DS, Reyzer ML, Chaurand P. MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: molecular snapshots of biochemical systems. Nat Methods 2007;4:828-833. (Pubitemid 350055580)
139. Jung S, Chen Y, Sullards MC, Ragauskas AJ. Direct analysis of cellulose in poplar stem by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Sp 2010;24:3230-3236.
140. McEwen C, Jackson C, Larsen BS. Instrumental effects in the analysis of polymers of wide polydispersity by MALDI mass spectrometry. J Mass Spec Ion Proc 1997;160:380-384.
141. Lunsford KA, Peter GF, Yost RA. Direct matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric imaging of cellulose and hemicellulose in Populus tissue. Anal Chem 2011;83:6722-6730.
142. Shchukarev A, Sundberg B, Mellerowicz E, Persson P. XPS study of living tree. Surf Interface Anal. 2002;34:284-288.
143. McCann MC, Hammouri M, Wilson R, et al. Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy is a new way to look at plant cell walls. Plant Physiol 1992;100:1940-1947.
144. Gierlinger N, Schwanninger M. Chemical imaging of poplar wood cell walls by confocal raman microscopy. Plant Physiol 2006;140:1246-1254. (Pubitemid 43956212)
145. Zeng Y, Saar B, Friedrich M, et al. Imaging lignin-downregulated alfalfa using coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy. Bioenerg Res 2010;3: 272-277.
146. Saar B, Zeng Y, Freudiger CW, Liu Y, et al. Label-free, real-time monitoring of biomass processing with stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. Angew Chem Int Edit 2010;49:5476-5479.
147. Ding S, Himmel M. The maize primary cell wall microfibril: A new model derived from direct visualization. J Agric Food Chem 2006;54:597-606. (Pubitemid 43274091)
148. Tetard L. 2010. Surface and Subsurface Physical and Chemical Characterization of Materials at the Nanoscale [dissertation]. [Knoxville, TN] University of Tennessee.
149. Tetard L, Passian A, Farahi RH, et al. Spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy of biomass. Ultramicroscopy 2010;110:701-707.
150. Tetard L, Passian A, Farahi RH, et al. Nanometrology of delignified Populus using mode synthesizing atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology 2011;22:465702.
151. Liu Y, Zeng Y, Luo Y, et al. Does the cellulose-binding module move on the cellulose surface? Cellulose 2009;16:587-597.
152. Dagel DJ, Liu Y, Zhong L, et al. In situ imaging of single carbohydrate-binding modules on cellulose microfibrils. J Phys Chem B 2011;115:635-641.
153. Liu Y, Luo Y, Baker JO, et al. A single molecule study of cellulase hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose. In: Proceeding of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (presentation). San Francisco, CA, July 23-28, 2010.
154. Liu Y, Baker J, Zeng Y, et al. Cellobiohydrolase hydrolyzes crystalline cellulose on hydrophobic faces. J Biol Chem 2011;296(13):11195-11201.
155. Velleste R, Teugjas H, Väljamäe P. Reducing end-specific fluorescence labeled celluloses for cellulase mode of action. Cellulose 2010;17(1): 125-138.
156. Rudsander UJ, Sandstrom C, Piens K, et al. Comparative NMR analysis of cellooligosaccharide hydrolysis by GH9 bacterial and plant endo-1,4-beta- glucanases. Biochemistry-US 2008;47(18):5235-5241. (Pubitemid 351620760)
157. Turon X, Rojas OJ, Deinhammer RS. Enzymatic kinetics of cellulose hydrolysis: A QCM-D Study. Langmuir 2008;24(8):3880-3887. (Pubitemid 351568987)
158. Wang L, Wang Y, Ragauskas AJ. A novel FRET approach for in situ investigation of cellulase-cellulose interaction. Anal Bioanal Chem 2010;398:1257-1262.
159. Wang L, Wang Y, Ragauskas AJ. Determination of cellulase colocalization on cellulose fiber with quantitative FRET measured by acceptor photobleaching and spectrally unmixing fluorescence microscopy. Analyst 2012;137:1319-1324.