Evidence-Based Management and Academic Research Relevance

Knowledge and Process Management

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 121-130

  Booker, Lorne D ^a   Bontis, Nick ^a   Serenko, Alexander ^b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865191271     PISSN: 10924604     EISSN: 10991441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/kpm.1392     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anandarajan M, Lippert SK. 2006. Competing mistresses? Academic vs. practitioner perceptions of systems analysis. The Journal of Computer Information Systems 46(5): 114-126.
2. Andriessen D. 2004. Reconciling the rigor-relevance dilemma in intellectual capital research. The Learning Organization 11(4/5): 393-401.
3. Ankers P, Brennan R. 2002. Managerial relevance in academic research: an exploratory study. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 20(1): 15-21.
4. Bailey J, Ford C. 1996. Management as science versus management as practice in postgraduate business education. Business Strategy Review 7(4): 7-12.
5. Bakos Y. 1998. The emerging role of electronic marketplaces on the Internet. Communications of the ACM 41(8): 35-42.
6. Bennis WG, O'Toole J. 2005. How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review 83(5): 96-104.
7. Beyer JM. 1997. Research utilization: bridging a cultural gap between communities. Journal of Management Inquiry 6(1): 17-22.
8. Bolton M, Stolcis G. 2003. Ties that do not bind: musings on the specious relevance of academic research. Public Administration Review 63(5): 626-630.
9. Bontis N. 2001. Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Reviews 3(1): 41-60.
10. Booker LD, Bontis N, Serenko A. 2008. The relevance of knowledge management and intellectual capital research. Knowledge and Process Management 15(4): 235-246.
11. Brett D, Bontis N. 2004. Selling expertise to the highest bidder. KM Review 7(3): 28-31.
12. Breu K, Peppard J. 2003. Useful knowledge for information systems practice: the contribution of the participatory paradigm. Journal of Information Technology 18(3): 177-193.
13. Cascio WF. 2007. Evidence-based management and the marketplace for ideas. Academy of Management Journal 50(5): 1009-1012.
14. Cohen DJ. 2007. The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner publications in human resource management: reasons for the divide and concrete solutions for bridging the gap. Academy of Management Journal 50(5): 1013-1019.
15. Curado C, Bontis N. 2006. The knowledge-based view of the firm and its theoretical precursor. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital 3(4): 367-381.
16. Dahlman C. 1979. The problem of externality. Journal of Law and Economics 22(1): 141-162.
17. Davenport TH, Prusak L. 1998. Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, Massachusetts.
18. Estabrooks C, Thompson D, Lovely J, Hofmeyer A. 2006. A guide to knowledge translation theory. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 26(1): 25-36.
19. Fang S-C, Su H-Y. 2008. Organisational knowledge creation: a knowledge market efficiency perspective. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies 2(2): 214-235.
20. Ferguson J. 2005. Bridging the gap between research and practice. Knowledge Management for Development Journal 1(3): 46-54.
21. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: the Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage Publications: London.
22. Grant RM. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17: 109-122.
23. Holmes R. 2009. The Age of Wonder: How the Romantic Generation Discovered the Beauty and Terror of Science. Harper Press: London.
24. Jennex ME. 2008. The impact of culture and context on knowledge management. In Current Issues in Knowledge Management, Jennex ME (ed.). Information Science Reference: Hershey, Pennsylvania; 6-12.
25. Kelemen M, Bansal R. 2002. The conventions of management research and their relevance to management practice. British Journal of Management 13(2): 97-108.
26. Matson E, Patiath P, Shavers T. 2003. Stimulating knowledge sharing: strengthening your organization's internal knowledge market. Organizational Dynamics 32(3): 275-285.
27. Miranda SM, Saunders CS. 2003. The social construction of meaning: an alternative perspective on information sharing. Information Systems Research 14(1): 87-106.
28. Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review 23(2): 242-266.
29. Nickerson JA, Zenger TR. 2004. A knowledge-based theory of the firm-the problem-solving perspective. Organization Science 15(6): 617-632.
30. Nonaka I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5(1): 14-37.
31. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. 2003. 'Mode 2' revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy 41(3): 179-194.
32. Orlikowski WJ. 2002. Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science 13(3): 249-273.
33. Pearson JM, Pearson A, Shim JP. 2005. The relevancy of information systems research: the practitioner's view. Information Resources Management Journal 18(3): 50-67.
34. Pfeffer J, Sutton R. 2006. Evidence-based management. Harvard Business Review 84(1): 62.
35. Robert JLP, Dennis AR, Ahuja MK. 2008. Social capital and knowledge integration in digitally enabled teams. Information Systems Research 19(3): 314-334.
36. Rousseau DM. 2006. Is there such a thing as "evidence-based management"? Academy of Management Review 31(2): 256-269.
37. Rousseau DM. 2007. A sticky, leveraging, and scalable strategy for high-quality connections between organizational practice and science. Academy of Management Journal 50(5): 1037-1042.
38. Rynes SL, Giluk TL, Brown KG. 2007. The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner periodicals in human resource management: implications for evidence-based management. Academy of Management Journal 50(5): 987-1008.
39. Serenko A, Bontis N, Hull E. 2011. Practical relevance of knowledge management and intellectual capital scholarly research: books as knowledge translation agents. Knowledge and Process Management 18(1): 1-9.
40. Serenko A, Bontis N, Moshonsky M. 2012. Books as a knowledge translation mechanism: citation analysis and author survey. Journal of Knowledge Management 16(3): 495-511.
41. Serenko A, Turel O. 2010. Rigor and relevance: the application of the Critical Incident Technique to investigate email usage. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 20(2): 182-207.
42. Spender J. 1994. Organizational knowledge, collective practice and Penrose rents. International Business Review 3(4): 353-367.
43. Walshe, K, Rundall TG. 2001. Evidence-based management: from theory to practice in health care. The Milbank Quarterly 79(3): 429-457.
44. Worren N, Moore K, Elliott R. 2002. When theories become tools: toward a framework for pragmatic validity. Human Relations 55(10): 1227-1250.