Research utilization: Bridging a cultural gap between communities

Journal of Management Inquiry

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 17-22

  Beyer, Janice M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031517222     PISSN: 10564926     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/105649269761004     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Beyer, J. M. (1992). Metaphors, misunderstandings, and mischief: A commentary. Organization Science, 3, 467-474.
2. Beyer, J. M., Ashmos, D. P., & Osborn, R. N. (in press). Contrasts in enacting TQM: Mechanistic vs. organic ideology and implementation. Journal of Quality Management.
3. Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. (1978). Implementing change: Alcoholism policies in work organizations. New York: Free Press.
4. Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. (1982). The utilization process: A conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 591-622.
5. Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. (1983). Current and prospective roles for linking organizational researchers and users. In R. H. Kilmann, K. W. Thomas, D. P. Slevin, R. Nath, & S. L. Jerrell (Eds.), Producing useful knowledge for organizations (pp. 675-702). New York: Praeger.
6. Braybrooke, D., & Lindblom, C. E. (1963). A strategy of decisions. New York: Free Press.
7. Carter, R. K. (1971). Clients' resistance to negative findings and the latent conservative function of evaluation studies. The American Sociologist, 6, 118-124.
8. Coleman, J. S. (1978). The use of social science research in the development of public policy. Urban Review, 10, 197-202.
9. Eaton, J. W. (1962). Symbolic and substantive evaluation research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6, 421-442.
10. Edelman, M. (1977). Political language: Words that succeed and policies that fall. New York: Academic Press.
11. Farrell, C., & Mandel, M. J. (1992, April 6). Industrial policy. Business Week, pp. 70-75.
12. Hall, R. H. (1966). The applied sociologist and organizational sociology. In A. B. Shostak (Ed.), Sociology in action: Case studies in social change (pp. 33-39). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
13. Kilmann, R. H., Slevin, D. P., & Thomas, K. W. (1983). The problem of producing useful knowledge. In R. H. Kilmann, K. W. Thomas, D. P. Slevin, R. Nath, & S. L. Jerrell (Eds.), Producing useful knowledge for organizations (pp. 1-21). New York: Praeger.
14. Lawrence, P. R., & Dyer, D. (1983). Renewing American industry. New York: Free Press.
15. Pelz, D. C. (1978). Some expanded perspectives on use of social science in public policy. In M. Yinger & S. J. Cutler (Eds.), Major social issues: A multidisciplinary view (pp. 346-357). New York: Free Press.
16. Rush, H.M.R., & Wikstrom, W. S. (1969). The reception of behavioral science in industry. The Conference Board Record, 9, 45-54.
17. Van de Vall, M., Bolas, C., & Kang, T. S. (1976). Applied social research in industrial organizations: An evaluation of functions, theory and methods. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12, 158-177.
18. Weiss, C. H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39, 426-431.