Three factors in the design and acquisition of language

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 493-499

  O'Grady, William ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865162166     PISSN: 19395078     EISSN: 19395086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1188     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Chomsky N. Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon; 1975.
2. Chomsky N. Language and other cognitive systems: What is special about language? Lang Learn Dev 2011, 7:263-278.
3. Chomsky N. Three factors in language design. Linguist Inq 2005, 36:1-22.
4. Chomsky N. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1986.
5. Chomsky N. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995.
6. Hauser MW, Fitch T, Chomsky N. The language faculty: What it is, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 2002, 298:1569-1579.
7. Coolidge F, Overmann K, Wynn T. Recursion: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? WIRES: Cogn Sci 2011, 2:547-554.
8. Boeckx C, Longa V. Lenneberg's views on language development and evolution and their relevance for modern biolinguistics. Biolinguistics 2011, 5:254-273.
9. Boeckx C. Round table: language universals: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. In: Piattelli-Palmarini M, Uriagereka J, Salaburu P, eds. Of Minds and Language: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009, 195-220.
10. Chomsky N. Approaching UG from below. In: Sauerland U, Gärtner H, eds. Interfaces + Recursion = Language? New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 2007, 1-29.
11. Christiansen M, Chater N. Language as shaped by the brain. Behav Brain Sci 2008, 31:489-558.
12. Elman J, Bates E, Johnson M, Karmiloff-Smith A, Parisi D, Plunkett K. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1996.
13. Benítez-Burraco A, Longa V. Evo-Devo-Of course, but which one? Some comments on Chomsky's anaologies between the biolinguistic approach and Evo-Devo. Biolinguistics 2010, 4:308-323.
14. Newmeyer F. Against a parameter-setting approach to typological variation. Linguist Variation Yearbook 2004, 4:181-234.
15. Evans N, Levinson S. The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behav Brain Sci 2009, 32:429-448.
16. Levinson S, Evans N. Time for a sea-change in linguistics: responses to comments on 'The myth of language universals.' Lingua 2010, 120:2733-2758.
17. Pinker S, Jackendoff R. The faculty of language: What's special about it? Cognition 2005, 97:201-236.
18. Newmeyer F. Review of On nature and language, by N. Chomsky. Language 2003, 79:583-599.
19. Berwick R, Pietroski P, Yankama B, Chomsky N. Poverty of the stimulus revisited. Cogn Sci 2011, 35:1207-1242.
20. Baker M. The Atoms of Language: The Mind's Hidden Rules of Grammar. New York: Basic Books; 2001.
21. Yang C. Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
22. Longa V, Lorenzo G. What about a (really) minimalist theory of language acquisition? Linguistics 2008, 46:541-570.
23. Tomasello M. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press; 2003.
24. Lieven E. Input and first language acquisition: evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua 2010, 120:2546-2556.
25. Saffran J, Aslin R, Newport E. Statistical learning by 8-month old infants. Science 1996, 274:1926-1928.
26. Thompson S, Newport E. Statistical learning of syntax: the role of transitional probability. Lang Learn Dev 2007, 3:1-42.
27. Saffran J, Hauser M, Seibel R, Kapfhamer J, Tsao F, Cushman F. Grammatical pattern learning by human infants and cotton-top tamarin monkeys. Cognition 2008, 107:479-500.
28. Elman J. Computational approaches to language acquisition. In: Brown K, ed. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, vol. 2. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2006, 726-732.
29. Reali F, Christiansen M. Uncovering the richness of the stimulus: structure dependence and indirect statistical evidence. Cogn Sci 2005, 29:1007-1028.
30. O'Grady W. Does emergentism have a chance? In: Chan H, Jacob H, Kapia E, eds. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press; 2008, 16-35.
31. Saffran J. Statistical language learning: mechanisms and constraints. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2003, 12:110-114.
32. Sebastián-Gallés N. Biased to learn language. Dev Sci 2007, 10:713-718.
33. Chater N, Christiansen M. Language acquisition meets language evolution. Cogn Sci 2010, 34:1131-1157.
34. Chomsky N. On phases. In: Freidin R, Otero C, Zubizarreta M, eds. Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008, 133-166.
35. Jaeger TF, Tily H. On language 'utility': processing complexity and communicative efficiency. WIRES: Cogn Sci 2011, 2:323-335.
36. Ferreira F, Christianson K, Hollingworth A. Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences: Implications for models of reanalysis. J Psycholinguist Res 2001, 30:3-20.
37. Hawkins J. Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language 1999, 75:244-285.
38. O'Grady W. Syntactic Carpentry: An Emergentist Approach to Syntax. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2005.
39. Gibson E. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 1998, 68:1-76.
40. Goodall G. On the syntax and processing of wh-questions in Spanish. ProcWest Coast Conf Formal Linguist 2004, 23:101-114.
41. Phillips C, Kazanina N, Abada S. ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies. Cogn Brain Res 2005, 22:407-428.
42. Frazier L, Clifton C. Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser. Lang Cogn Processes 1989, 4:93-126.
43. Kluender R. On the distinction between strong and weak islands: a processing perspective. In: Culicover P, McNally L, eds. The Limits of Syntax, (Syntax and Semantics 29). San Diego: Academic Press; 1998, 241-279.
44. Hoffmeister P, Sag I. Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language 2010, 86:366-415.
45. Hawkins J. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.
46. Crain S, Nakayama M. Structure dependence in grammar formation. Language 1987, 63:522-543.