The behavioralist visits the factory: Increasing productivity using simple framing manipulations

Management Science

Volumn 58, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 2151-2167

  Hossain, Tanjim ^a   List, John A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Framing effect; Loss aversion; Natural field experiment; Worker productivity

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS; FRAMING EFFECTS; INCENTIVE EFFECTS; LOSS AVERSION; MANUFACTURING FACILITY; NATURAL FIELDS; NATURALLY OCCURRING;

PRODUCTIVITY;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84865081295     PISSN: 00251909     EISSN: 15265501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1544     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and Identity. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):715-753.
2. Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2008) Identity, supervision, and work groups. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(2):212-217.
3. Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2005) Social preferences and the response to incentives: Evidence from personnel data. Quart. J. Econom. 120(3):917-962.
4. Bellemare C, Shearer B (2009) Gift giving and worker productivity: Evidence from a firm-level experiment. Games Econom. Behav. 67(1):233-244.
5. Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2010) Human resource management and productivity. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4B (Elsevier Amsterdam), 1697-1767.
6. Chen H, Lim N, Ahearne M (2011) Should managers use teambased contests? An experimental study. Working paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison.
7. Cheng P-Y, Chiou W-B (2008) Framing effects in group investment decision making: Role of group polarization. Psych. Rep. 102(1):283-292.
8. Choe H, Eom Y (2009) The disposition effect and investment performance in the futures market. J. Futures Markets 29(6):496-522.
9. Dhar R, Zhu N (2006) Up close and personal: Investor sophistication and the disposition effect. Management Sci. 52(5):726-740.
10. Dickinson D (2001) The carrot vs. the stick in work team motivation. Experiment. Econom. 4:107-124.
11. Engelmann D, Hollard G (2010) Reconsidering the effect of market experience on the "endowment effect." Econometrica 78(6):2005-2019.
12. Feng L, Seasholes MS (2005) Do investor sophistication and trading experience eliminate behavioral biases in financial markets? Rev. Finance 9(3):305-351.
13. Gächter S, Orzen H, Renner E, Starmer C (2009) Are experimental economists prone to framing effects? A natural field experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 70(3):443-446.
14. Gneezy U, List JA (2006) Putting behavioral economics to work: Testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments. Econometrica 74(5):1365-1384.
15. Goette L, Huffman D, Fehr E (2004) Loss aversion and labor supply J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 2(2):216-228.
16. Greenwood R, Nagel S (2009) Inexperienced investors and bubbles. J. Financial Econom. 93(2):239-258.
17. Haigh MS, List JA (2005) Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis. J. Finance 60(1):521-534.
18. Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA, Owan H (2003) Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. 111:465-497.
19. Hannan RL, Hoffman VB, Moser DV (2005) Bonus versus penalty: Does contract frame affect employee effort? Rapoport A, Zwick R, eds. Experimental Business Research, Vol. II (Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), 151-169.
20. Hanneman M (1991) Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: How much can they differ? Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(3):635-647.
21. Harrison GW, List JA (2004) Field experiments. J. Econom. Literature 42(4):1009-1055.
22. Hennig-Schmidt H, Rockenbach B, Sadrieh A (2010) In search of workers' real effort reciprocity-A field and a laboratory experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 8(4):817-837.
23. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263-292.
24. Kermer DA, Driver-Linn E, Wilson TD, Gilbert DT (2006) Loss aversion is an affective forecasting error. Psych. Sci. 17(8):649-653.
25. Kohn A (1993) Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A's, Praise, and Other Bribes. (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).
26. Landa JT, Wang XT (2001) Bounded rationality of economic man: Decision making under ecological, social, and institutional constraints. J. Bioeconomics 3(2):217-235.
27. Lee D, Rupp NG (2007) Retracting a gift: How does employee effort respond to wage reductions? J. Labor Econom. 25(4):725-762.
28. Levitt S, List JA (2007) What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? J. Econom. Perspect. 21(2):153-174.
29. List JA (2003) Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):41-71.
30. List JA (2004) Neoclassical theory versus prospect theory: Evidence from the marketplace. Econometrica 72(2):615-625.
31. List JA (2011) Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? The case of exogenous market experience. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(3):313-317.
32. Loewenstein G (2005) Hot-cold empathy gaps and medical decision-making. Health Psych. 24(4):S49-S56.
33. MacCrimmon KR, Larsson S (1979) Utility theory: Axioms versus paradoxes. Allais M, Hagen O, eds. The Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Allais Paradox (D. Riedel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), 333-409.
34. Mas A (2006) Pay, reference points, and policy performance. Quart. J. Econom. 121(3):783-821.
35. Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112-145.
36. McElroy T, Seta JJ (2006) Does it matter if it involves my group? How the importance of collective-esteem influences a groupbased framing task. Soc. Cognition 24(4):496-510.
37. Munro A, Ferreira De Sousa Y (2012) Truck, barter and exchange versus the endowment effect: Virtual field experiments in an online game environment. J. Econom. Psych. 33(3):482-493.
38. Paese PW, Bieser M, Tubbs ME (1993) Framing effects and choice shifts in group decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 56(1):149-165.
39. Pope DG, Schweitzer ME (2011) Is Tiger Woods loss averse? Persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(1):129-157.
40. Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertainty 1(1):7-59.
41. Seru A, Shumway T, Stoffman N (2010) Learning by trading. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(2):705-739.
42. Shi L (2010) Incentive effects of piece rate contracts: Evidence from two small field experiments. Topics Econom. Anal. Policy 10(1):Article 61.
43. Stoddard JE, Fern EF (2002) Buying group choice: The effect of individual group member's prior decision frame. Psych. Marketing 19(1):59-90.
44. Syverson C (2011) What determines productivity? J. Econom. Literature 49(2):326-365.
45. Thaler R (1980) Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 1(1):39-60.
46. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. 106(4):1039-1061.
47. Van de Ven J (2012) Framing contracts. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. 168(1):89-93.
48. Weber EU, Hsee C (1998) Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Sci. 44(9):1205-1217.