Construction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with enhanced ethanol tolerance by mutagenesis of the TATA-binding protein gene and identification of novel genes associated with ethanol tolerance

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 108, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1776-1787

  Yang, Jungwoo ^a   Bae, Ju Yun ^a   Lee, Young Mi ^a   Kwon, Hyeji ^a   Moon, Hye Yun ^b   Kang, Hyun Ah ^b   Yee, Su bog ^a   Kim, Wankee ^c   Choi, Wonja ^a  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

^b Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

^c Ajou University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

DNA microarray; Ethanol stress; Ethanol tolerance; Mutagenesis; SPT15

Indexed keywords

CONTROL STRAIN; DELETION MUTANTS; DNA MICRO-ARRAY; ETHANOL FERMENTATION; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL STRESS; ETHANOL TOLERANCE; ETHANOL YIELD; GENE KNOCKOUT; INDUSTRIAL SCALE; MUTANT ALLELES; MUTANT LIBRARIES; RICH MEDIAS; S.CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE STRAINS; SELECTED STRAINS; SPT15; TATA-BINDING PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTIONAL MACHINERY; YEAST STRAIN;

ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENES; GLUCOSE; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; MACHINERY; MUTAGENESIS; YEAST;

ELASTICITY;

ALCOHOL; PROTEIN SPT15; TATA BINDING PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ALCOHOL TOLERANCE; ARTICLE; FERMENTATION TECHNIQUE; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS IDENTIFICATION; GENE CONTROL; GENE IDENTIFICATION; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MUTAGENESIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MUTAGENESIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TATA-BOX BINDING PROTEIN;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 79959248684     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.23141     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alexandre H, Ansanay-Galeote V, Dequin S, Blondin S. 2001. Global gene expression during short-term ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae FEBS Lett 498: 98-103.
2. Alper H, Moxley J, Nevoigt E, Fink GR, Stephanopoulos G. 2006. Engineering yeast transcription machinery for improved ethanol tolerance and production. Science 314: 1565-1568.
3. Baerends RJ, Qiu JL, Rasmussen S, Nielsen HB, Brandt A. 2009. Impaired uptake and/or utilization of leucine by Saccharomyces cerevisiae is suppressed by the SPT 15-300 allele of the TATA-binding protein gene. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 6055-6061.
4. Cang Y, Auble DT, Prelich G. 1999. A new regulatory domain on the TATA-binding protein. EMBO J 18: 6662-6671.
5. Chandler M, Stanley GA, Rogers P, Chambers P. 2004. A genomic approach to defining the ethanol stress response in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ann Microbiol 54: 427-454.
6. Ding J, Huang X, Zhang L, Zhao N, Yang D, Zhang K. 2009. Tolerance and stress response to ethanol in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85: 253-263.
7. Dinh TN, Nagahisa K, Yoshikawa K, Hirasawa T, Furusawa C, Shimizu H. 2009. Analysis of adaptation to high ethanol concentration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using DNA microarray. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 32: 681-688.
8. Eisenmann DM, Dollard C, Winston F. 1989. SPT15, the gene encoding the yeast TATA binding factor TFIID, is required for normal transcription initiation in vivo. Cell 58: 1183-1191.
9. Fujita K, Matsuyama A, Kobayashi Y, Iwahashi H. 2006. The genome-wide screening of yeast deletion mutants to identify the genes required for tolerance to ethanol and other alcohols. FEMS Yeast Res 6: 744-750.
10. Gibson BR, Lawrence SJ, Leclaire JP, Powell CD, Smart KA. 2007. Yeast responses to stresses associated with industrial brewery handling. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31: 535-569.
11. Gietz RD, Woods RA. 2002. Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods Enzymol 350: 87-96.
12. He XJ, Fassler JS. 2005. Identification of novel Yap1p and Skn7p binding sites involved in the oxidative stress response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol Microbiol 58: 1454-1467.
13. Hirasawa T, Yoshikawa K, Nakakura Y, Nagahisa K, Furusawa C, Katakura Y, Shimizu H, Shioya S. 2007. Identification of target genes conferring ethanol stress tolerance to Saccharomyces cerevisiae based on DNA microarray data analysis. J Biotechnol 131: 34-44.
14. Hong ME, Lee KS, Yu BJ, Sung YJ, Park SM, Koo HM, Kweon DH, Park JC, Jin YS. 2010. Identification of gene targets eliciting improved alcohol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through inverse metabolic engineering. J Biotechnol 149: 52-59.
15. Hou L. 2009. Novel methods of genome shuffling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Biotechnol Lett 31: 671-677.
16. Hou L, Cao X, Wang C, Lu M. 2009. Effect of overexpression of transcription factors on the fermentation properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae industrial strains. Lett Appl Microbiol 49: 14-19.
17. Kubota S, Takeo I, Kume K, Kanai M, Shitamukai A, Mizunuma M, Miyakawa T, Shimoi H, Iefuji H, Hirata D. 2004. Effect of ethanol on cell growth of budding yeast: Genes that are important for cell growth in the presence of ethanol. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 68: 968-972.
18. Ma M, Liu ZL. 2010a. Mechanisms of ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87: 829-845.
19. Ma M, Liu ZL. 2010b. Quantitative transcription dynamic analysis reveals candidate genes and key regulators for ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae BMC Microbiol 10: 169-188.
20. Marks VD, Ho Sui SJ, Erasmus D, van der Merwe GK, Brumm J, Wasserman WW, Bryan J, van Vuuren HJJ. 2008. Dynamics of the yeast transcriptome during wine fermentation reveals a novel stress response. FEMS Yeast Res 8: 35-52.
21. Ogawa N, Mori K. 2004. Autoregulation of the HAC1 gene is required for sustained activation of the yeast unfolded protein response. Genes Cells 9: 95-104.
22. Ogawa Y, Nitta A, Uchiyama H, Imamura T, Shiomoi H, Ito K. 2000. Tolerance mechanism of the ethanol-tolerant mutant of sake yeast. J Biosci Bioeng 90: 313-320.
23. Oh KS, Kwon O, Oh YW, Sohn MJ, Jung S, Kim YK, Kim MG, Rhee SK, Gellissen G, Kang HA. 2004. Fabrication of a partial genome microarray of the methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha: Optimization and evaluation for transcript profiling. J Microbiol Biotechnol 14: 1239-1248.
24. Park JN, Sohn MJ, Oh DB, Kwon O, Rhee SK, Hur CG, Lee SY, Gellissen G, Kang HA. 2007. Identification of the cadmium-inducible Hansenula polymorpha SEO1 gene promoter by transcriptome analysis and its application to whole-cell heavy-metal detection systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 5990-6000.
25. Pieler R, Sanchez-Cabo F, Hackl H, Thallinger GG, Trajanoski Z. 2004. ArrayNorm: Comprehensive normalization and analysis of microarray data. Bioinformatics 20: 1971-1973.
26. Rossignol T, Dulau L, Julien A, Blondin B. 2003. Genome-wide monitoring of wine yeast gene expression during alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 20: 1369-1385.
27. Sambrook J, Russell D. 2001. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual, 3rd edition. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
28. Shobayashi M, Ukena E, Fujii T, Iefuji H. 2007. Genome-wide expression profiles of sake brewing yeast under shaking and static conditions. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 71: 323-335.
29. Teixeira MC, Raposo LR, Mira NP, Lourenco AB, Sa-Correia I. 2009. Genome-wide identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required for maximal tolerance to ethanol. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 5761-5772.
30. van Voorst F, Houghton-Larsen J, Jonson L, Kielland-Brandt MC, Brandt A. 2006. Genome-wide identification of genes required for growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under ethanol stress. Yeast 23: 351-359.
31. Varela CJ, Cardenas J, Melo F, Agosin E. 2005. Quantitative analysis of wine yeast gene expression profiles under winemaking conditions. Yeast 22: 369-383.
32. Watanabe M, Tamura K, Magbanua JP, Takano K, Kitamoto K, Kitagaki H, Akao T, Shimoi H. 2007. Elevated expression of genes under the control of stress response element (STRE) and Msn2p in an ethanol-tolerance sake yeast Kyokai no. 11. J Biosci Bioeng 104: 163-170.
33. Wu H, Zheng X, Araki Y, Sahara H, Takagi H, Shimoi H. 2006. Global gene expression analysis of yeast cells during sake brewing. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 7353-7358.
34. Yamamoto N, Maeda Y, Ikeda A, Sakurai H. 2008. Regulation of thermotolerance by stress-induced transcription factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Eukaryot Cell 7: 783-790.
35. Yazawa H, Iwahashi H, Uemura H. 2007. Disruption of URA7 and GAL6 improves the ethanol tolerance and fermentation capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast 24: 551-560.
36. Yoshikawa K, Tanaka T, Furusawa C, Nagahisa K, Hirasawa T, Shimizu H. 2009. Comprehensive phenotypic analysis for identification of genes affecting growth under ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae FEMS Yeast Res 9: 32-44.
37. Zhao XQ, Bai FW. 2009. Mechanisms of yeast stress tolerance and its manipulation for efficient fuel ethanol production. J Biotechnol 144: 23-30.