Relating consumer acceptance to descriptive attributes by three-way external preference mapping obtained by parallel factor analysis (parafac)

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 209-216

  Nunes, Cleiton A ^a   Bastos, Sabrina C ^a   Pinheiro, Ana Carla M ^a   Pimenta, Carlos J ^a   Pimenta, Maria Emília S Gomes ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF LAVRAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMERCIAL SAMPLE; CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; DATA SETS; GRAPE JUICE; PARAFAC; PARALLEL FACTOR ANALYSIS;

FRUIT JUICES; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS;

FACTOR ANALYSIS;

EID: 84864807828     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2012.00387.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ANDERSSON, C.A. and BRO, R. 2000. The N-way Toolbox for MATLAB. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 52, 1-4.
2. BRO, R. 1997. PARAFAC. Tutorial and applications. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 38, 149-171.
3. BRO, R. and KIERS, H.A.L. 2003. A new efficient method for determining the number of components in PARAFAC models. J. Chemom. 17, 274-286.
4. BRO, R., QANNARI, E.M., KIERS, H.A.L., NÆS, T. and FRØST, M.B. 2008. Multi-way models for sensory profiling data. J. Chemom. 22, 36-45.
5. CARROLL, J.D. 1972. Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. In Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences (R.N. Shepard, A.K. Romney and S.B. Nerlove, eds.) Seminar Press, New York, NY.
6. CHAPMAN, K.W., LAWLESS, H.T. and BOOR, K.J. 2001. Quantitative descriptive analysis and principal component analysis for sensory characterization of ultrapasteurized milk. J. Dairy Sci. 84, 12-20.
7. COCCHI, M., BRO, R., DURANTE, C., MANZINI, D., MARCHETTI, A., SACCANI, F., SIGHINOLFI, S. and ULRICI, A. 2006. Analysis of sensory data of Aceto Balsamico Tradizionale di Modena (ABTM) of different ageing by application of PARAFAC models. Food Qual. Prefer. 17, 419-428.
8. DONADINI, G. and FUMI, M.D. 2010. Sensory mapping of beers on sale in the Italian market. J. Sensory Studies 25, 19-49.
9. ELMORE, J.R., HEYMANN, H., JOHNSON, J. and HEWETT, J.E. 1999. Preference mapping: Relating acceptance of "creaminess" to a descriptive sensory map of a semi-solid. Food Qual. Prefer. 10, 465-475.
10. FELBERG, I., DELIZA, R., FARAH, A., CALADO, E. and DONANGELO, C.M. 2010. Formulation of a soy-coffee beverage by response surface methodology and internal preference mapping. J. Sensory Studies 25, 226-242.
11. GREENHOFF, K. and MACFIE, H.J.H. 1999. Preference Mapping in practice. In Measurement of Food Preferences (H.J.H. MacFie and D.M.H. Thomson, eds.) Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg, MD.
12. HEIN, K., EBELER, S.E. and HEYMANN, H. 2009. Perception of fruity and vegetative aroma in red wine. J. Sensory Studies 24, 441-455.
13. LAWLESS, H.T. and HEYMANN, H. 2010. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices, Springer, New York, NY.
14. LOVELY, C. and MEULLENET, J.F. 2009. Comparison of preference mapping techniques for the optimization of strawberry yogurt. J. Sensory Studies 24, 457-478.
15. MICHON, C., O'SULLIVAN, M.G., SHEEHAN, E., DELAHUNTY, C.M. and KERRY, J.P. 2010. Investigation of the influence of age, gender and consumption habits on the liking of jam-filled cakes. Food Qual. Prefer. 21, 553-561.
16. MOSKOWITZ, H.R. 1983. Product Testing and Sensory Evaluation of Foods: Marketing and R and D Approaches, Food and Nutrition Press, Westport, CT.
17. NÆS, T., BROCKHOFF, P. and TOMIC, O. 2010. Statistics for Sensory and Consumer Science, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, U.K.
18. NESTRUD, M.A. and LAWLESS, H.T. 2008. Perceptual mapping of citrus juices using projective mapping and profiling data from culinary professionals and consumers. Food Qual. Prefer. 19, 431-438.
19. NUNES, C.A., PINHEIRO, A.C.M. and BASTOS, S.C. 2011. Evaluating consumer acceptance tests by three-way internal preference mapping obtained by parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC). J. Sensory Studies 26, 167-174.
20. SCHLICH, P. 1995. Preference mapping: Relating consumer preferences to sensory or instrumental measurements. In Bioflavour'95: Analysis/Precursor Studies/Biotechnology (P. Étiévant and P. Schreier, eds.) pp. 135-150, INRA, Dijon, France.
21. STONE, H. and SIDEL, J. 1993. Sensory Evaluation Practices, Academic Press, New York, NY.
22. SVEINSDÓTTIR, K., MARTINSDÓTTIR, E., GREEN-PETERSEN, D., HYLDIG, G., SCHELVIS, R. and DELAHUNTY, C. 2009. Sensory characteristics of different cod products related to consumer preferences and attitudes. Food Qual. Prefer. 20, 120-132.
23. TENENHAUS, M., PAGÉS, J., AMBROISINE, L. and GUINOT, C. 2005. PLS methodology to study relationships between hedonic judgments and product characteristics. Food Qual. Prefer. 16, 315-325.
24. VAN KLEEF, E., VAN TRIJP, H.C.M. and LUNING, P. 2006. Internal versus external preference analysis: An exploratory study on end-user evaluation. Food Qual. Prefer. 17, 387-399.
25. WAKELING, I.N. and MACFIE, J.H. 1995. Designing consumer trials balanced for first and higher orders of carry-over effect when only a subset of k samples from t may be tested. Food Qual. Prefer. 6, 299-308.
26. YENKET, R., CHAMBERS IV, E. and ADHIKARI, K. 2011. A comparison of seven preference mapping techniques using four software program. J. Sensory Studies 26, 135-150.