Randomized comparison of the i-gel™, the LMA Supreme™, and the Laryngeal Tube Suction-D using clinical and fibreoptic assessments in elective patients

BMC Anesthesiology

Volumn 12, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Russo, Sebastian G ^a   Cremer, Stephan ^a   Galli, Tamara ^a,b   Eich, Christoph ^a,c   Bräuer, Anselm ^a   Crozier, Thomas A ^a   Bauer, Martin ^a   Strack, Micha ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b MOLINETTE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^c Children's Hospital Auf der Bult   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Laryngeal mask airway; Laryngeal Tube; Leak pressure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AIRWAY PRESSURE; ANESTHETIC EQUIPMENT; ARTICLE; ASSISTED VENTILATION; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; FIBER OPTICS; HUMAN; I-GEL; LARYNGEAL TUBE SUCTION-D; LMA-SUPREME; LUNG COMPLIANCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL PATIENT; VELOCITY;

EID: 84864741230     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712253     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2253-12-18     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Walsh EM. Time to dispose of nondisposable LMAs. Anesth Analg 2005, 100(3):896-897. author reply 897.
2. Thee C, Serocki G, Doerges V, Ilies C, Wallenius K, Bein B, Steinfath M, Cavus E. Laryngeal tube S II, laryngeal tube S disposable, Fastrach laryngeal mask and Fastrach laryngeal mask disposable during elective surgery: a randomized controlled comparison between reusable and disposable supraglottic airway devices. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007, 27(5):468-472.
3. Gatward JJ, Cook TM, Seller C, Handel J, Simpson T, Vanek V, Kelly F. Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia 2008, 63(10):1124-1130. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05561.x, 18616521.
4. van Zundert A, Brimacombe J. The LMA Supreme-a pilot study. Anaesthesia 2008, 63(2):209-210. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05421.x, 18211462.
5. Schalk R, Scheller B, Habler OP, Meier J, Meininger D, Byhahn C. Disposable laryngeal tube suction-a randomized comparison of two insertion techniques performed by novice users in anaesthetised patients. Resuscitation 2008, 76(3):364-368. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.08.018, 17935855.
6. Teoh WH, Lee KM, Suhitharan T, Yahaya Z, Teo MM, Sia AT. Comparison of the LMA Supreme vs the i-gel in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with controlled ventilation. Anaesthesia 2010, 65(12):1173-1179. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06534.x, 20958278.
7. Timmermann A, Cremer S, Eich C, Kazmaier S, Brauer A, Graf BM, Russo SG. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology 2009, 110(2):262-265.
8. Klaver NS, Kuizenga K, Ballast A, Fidler V. A comparison of the clinical use of the Laryngeal Tube S and the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway by first-month anaesthesia residents in anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2007, 62(7):723-727. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05073.x, 17567350.
9. Townsend R, Brimacombe J, Keller C, Wenzel V, Herff H. Jaw thrust as a predictor of insertion conditions for the proseal laryngeal mask airway. Middle East J Anesthesiol 2009, 20(1):59-62.
10. Drage MP, Nunez J, Vaughan RS, Asai T. Jaw thrusting as a clinical test to assess the adequate depth of anaesthesia for insertion of the laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 1996, 51(12):1167-1170. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb15062.x, 9038461.
11. Brimacombe J, Keller C. Prime the ProSeal drain tube with lube from a tube!. Can J Anaesth 2005, 52(3):338-339.
12. Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999, 82(2):286-287. 10.1093/bja/82.2.286, 10365012.
13. Verghese C, Berlet J, Kapila A, Pollard R. Clinical assessment of the single use laryngeal mask airway-the LMA-unique. Br J Anaesth 1998, 80(5):677-679. 10.1093/bja/80.5.677, 9691877.
14. Gabbott DA, Beringer R. The iGEL supraglottic airway: a potential role for resuscitation?. Resuscitation 2007, 73(1):161-162. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.10.026, 17289250.
15. Tham HM, Tan SM, Woon KL, Zhao YD. A comparison of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed adult patients: a randomized crossover study. Can J Anaesth 2010, 57(7):672-678. 10.1007/s12630-010-9312-6, 20411444.
16. Genzwuerker HV, Altmayer S, Hinkelbein J, Gernoth C, Viergutz T, Ocker H. Prospective randomized comparison of the new Laryngeal Tube Suction LTS II and the LMA-ProSeal for elective surgical interventions. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007, 51(10):1373-1377. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01440.x, 17944641.
17. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007, 39(2):175-191. 10.3758/BF03193146, 17695343.
18. Medizintechnik V. Laryngeal Tube LTS-D - instruction for use 2007, 6-9. VBM Medizintechnik, Sulz a.N, http://www.larynx-tubus.de/larynx-tubus/content/blogcategory/21/125/lang,en/" and is dated 07/2007.
19. Kihara S, Brimacombe JR, Yaguchi Y, Taguchi N, Watanabe S. A comparison of sex- and weight-based ProSeal laryngeal mask size selection criteria: a randomized study of healthy anesthetized, paralyzed adult patients. Anesthesiology 2004, 101(2):340-343. 10.1097/00000542-200408000-00014, 15277916.
20. Zhang L, Seet E, Mehta V, Subramanyam R, Ankichetty SP, Wong DT, Chung F. Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme at different intracuff pressures: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth 2011, 58(7):624-629. 10.1007/s12630-011-9514-6, 21533663.
21. Seet E, Yousaf F, Gupta S, Subramanyam R, Wong DT, Chung F. Use of manometry for laryngeal mask airway reduces postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events: a prospective, randomized trial. Anesthesiology 2010, 112(3):652-657. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181cf4346, 20179502.
22. Wong JG, Heaney M, Chambers NA, Erb TO, von Ungern-Sternberg BS. Impact of laryngeal mask airway cuff pressures on the incidence of sore throat in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2009, 19(5):464-469. 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.02968.x, 19281479.
23. Brimacombe J. Educational considerations. Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia 2005, 539-549. Saunders, Philadelphia, Brimacombe J, 2.
24. Ulrich-Pur H, Hrska F, Krafft P, Friehs H, Wulkersdorfer B, Kostler WJ, Rabitsch W, Staudinger T, Schuster E, Frass M. Comparison of mucosal pressures induced by cuffs of different airway devices. Anesthesiology 2006, 104(5):933-938. 10.1097/00000542-200605000-00007, 16645443.
25. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Puhringer F. Pharyngeal mucosal pressure and perfusion: a fiberoptic evaluation of the posterior pharynx in anesthetized adult patients with a modified cuffed oropharyngeal airway. Anesthesiology 1999, 91(6):1661-1665. 10.1097/00000542-199912000-00018, 10598608.
26. Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Kaufmann M, Keller C, Tiefenthaler W. Directly measured mucosal pressures produced by the i-gel(TM) and laryngeal mask airway Supreme(TM) in paralysed anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2012, 67(4):407-410. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.07024.x, 22324968.
27. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Boehler M, Loeckinger A, Puehringer F. The influence of cuff volume and anatomic location on pharyngeal, esophageal, and tracheal mucosal pressures with the esophageal tracheal combitube. Anesthesiology 2002, 96(5):1074-1077. 10.1097/00000542-200205000-00008, 11981145.
28. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Kleinsasser A, Loeckinger A. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal tube airway versus ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2003, 38(6):393-396. 10.1055/s-2003-39359, 12759874.
29. Cavus E, Deitmer W, Francksen H, Serocki G, Bein B, Scholz J, Doerges V. Laryngeal tube S II, ProSeal laryngeal mask, and EasyTube during elective surgery: a randomized controlled comparison with the endotracheal tube in nontrained professionals. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009, 26(9):730-735. 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832a9932, 19373095.
30. Mihai R, Knottenbelt G, Cook TM. Evaluation of the revised laryngeal tube suction: the laryngeal tube suction II in 100 patients. Br J Anaesth 2007, 99(5):734-739. 10.1093/bja/aem260, 17872934.
31. Cook TM. A comparison of the Laryngeal Tube S and the LMA ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 2007, 62(12):1297. author reply 1298, 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05361_2.x, 17991277.
32. Schalk R, Byhahn C, Fausel F, Egner A, Oberndorfer D, Walcher F, Latasch L. Out-of-hospital airway management by paramedics and emergency physicians using laryngeal tubes. Resuscitation 2010, 81(3):323-326. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.007, 20006418.
33. Kette F, Reffo I, Giordani G, Buzzi F, Borean V, Cimarosti R, Codiglia A, Hattinger C, Mongiat A, Tararan S. The use of laryngeal tube by nurses in out-of-hospital emergencies: preliminary experience. Resuscitation 2005, 66(1):21-25. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.12.023, 15993725.
34. Heuer JF, Barwing J, Eich C, Quintel M, Crozier TA, Roessler M. Initial ventilation through laryngeal tube instead of face mask in out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest is effective and safe. Eur J Emerg Med 2010, 17(1):10-15. 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32832d852a, 20201123.
35. Park HJ, Lee JR, Kim CS, Kim SD, Kim HS. Remifentanil halves the EC50 of propofol for successful insertion of the laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 2007, 105(1):57-61. 10.1213/01.ane.0000266447.23037.e4, 17578957.
36. Richebe P, Rivalan B, Baudouin L, Sesay M, Sztark F, Cros AM, Maurette P. Comparison of the anaesthetic requirement with target-controlled infusion of propofol to insert the laryngeal tube vs. the laryngeal mask. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005, 22(11):858-863. 10.1017/S0265021505001456, 16225722.
37. Burlacu CL, Gaskin P, Fernandes A, Carey M, Briggs L. A comparison of the insertion characteristics of the laryngeal tube and the laryngeal mask airway: a study of the ED50 propofol requirements. Anaesthesia 2006, 61(3):229-233. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04442.x, 16480346.
38. Dahaba AA, Prax N, Gaube W, Gries M, Rehak PH, Metzler H. Haemodynamic and catecholamine stress responses to the Laryngeal Tube-Suction Airway and the Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway. Anaesthesia 2006, 61(4):330-334. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04548.x, 16548950.
39. Bortone L, Ingelmo PM, De Ninno G, Tosi M, Caffini L, Trenchi J, Mergoni M, Martorana F. Randomized controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube and the laryngeal mask in pediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth 2006, 16(3):251-257. 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01756.x, 16490088.
40. Kim JT, Na HS, Bae JY, Kim HJ, Shin HY, Kim HS, Kim CS, Kim SD. Flexion compromises ventilation with the laryngeal tube suction II in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2009, 19(2):153-158. 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02861.x, 19143960.
41. Gaitini LA, Vaida SJ, Somri M, Yanovski B, Ben-David B, Hagberg CA. A randomized controlled trial comparing the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway with the Laryngeal Tube Suction in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 2004, 101(2):316-320. 10.1097/00000542-200408000-00011, 15277913.
42. Cook TM, McKinstry C, Hardy R, Twigg S. Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the Laryngeal Tube during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth 2003, 91(5):678-683. 10.1093/bja/aeg239, 14570790.