A comparison of the insertion characteristics of the laryngeal tube and the laryngeal mask airway: A study of the ED50 propofol requirements

Anaesthesia

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 229-233

  Burlacu, Crina L ^a   Gaskin, P ^a   Fernandes, A ^a   Carey, M ^a   Briggs, L ^a  

^a Pathology Research Laboratory   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALFENTANIL; PROPOFOL;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANESTHETIC EQUIPMENT; ARTICLE; BOLUS INJECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG DOSE REDUCTION; DRUG DOSE REGIMEN; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNGEAL MASK; LARYNGEAL TUBE AIRWAY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADULT; ALFENTANIL; ANESTHETICS, COMBINED; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; ANTHROPOMETRY; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MIDDLE AGED; PROPOFOL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 33644754576     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04442.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Cook TM, McCormick B, Asai T. Randomized comparison of laryngeal tube with classic laryngeal mask airway for anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2003; 91: 373-8.
2. Asai T, Hidaka I, Kawachi S. Efficacy of the laryngeal tube by inexperienced personnel. Resuscitation 2002; 55: 171-5.
3. Scanlon P, Carey M, Power M, Kirby F. Patient response to laryngeal mask insertion after induction of anaesthesia with propofol or thiopentone. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 1993; 40: 816-8.
4. Hui JK, Critchley LA, Karmakar MK, Lam PK. Co-administration of alfentanil-propofol improves laryngeal mask airway insertion compared to fentanyl-propofol. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2002; 49: 508-12.
5. Dixon WJ. Staircase bioassay: The up-and-down method. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 1991; 15: 47-50.
6. Blake DW, Dawson P, Donnan G, Bjorksten A. Propofol induction for laryngeal mask airway insertion: Dose requirement and cardiorespiratory effects. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 1992; 20: 479- 83.
7. Tanaka M, Nishikawa T. Propofol requirement for insertion of cuffed oropharyngeal airway versus laryngeal mask airway with and without fentanyl: A dose-finding study. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2003; 90: 14-20.
8. Muzi M, Robinson BJ, Ebert TJ, O'Brien TJ. Induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation with sevoflurane in adults. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 536-43.
9. Goyagi T, Tanaka M, Nishikawa T. Oral clonidine premedication reduces propofol requirement for laryngeal mask airway insertion. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2000; 47: 627-30.
10. Ang S, Cheong KF, Ng TI. Alfentanil co-induction for laryngeal mask insertion. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 1999; 27: 175-8.
11. Nakazawa K, Hikawa Y, Maeda M, et al. Laryngeal mask airway insertion using propofol without muscle relaxants: A comparative study of pretreatment with midazolam or fentanyl. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 1999; 16: 550-5.
12. Stoneham MD, Bree SE, Sneyd JR. Facilitation of laryngeal mask insertion. Effects of lignocaine given intravenously before induction with propofol. Anaesthesia 1995; 50: 464-6.
13. Nathanson MH, Gajraj NM, Russell JA. Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: A comparison of lidocaine with alfentanil. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1996; 82: 469-71.