Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway with the Laryngeal Tube® during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 91, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 678-683

  Cook, T M ^a   McKinstry, C ^a   Hardy, R ^a   Twigg, S ^a  

^a ROYAL UNITED HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Equipment, masks laryngeal; Equipment, tubes laryngeal

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; PROPOFOL; ROCURONIUM;

ADULT; AGED; AIRWAY DYNAMICS; AIRWAY PRESSURE; ANESTHESIA; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; LARYNGOSCOPE; LARYNGOSCOPY; LARYNX; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0242467651     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeg239     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Cook TM, Nolan JP, Verghese C, et al. A randomised crossover comparison of the Pro-Seal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 527-33
2. Evans NR, Gardner SV, James MFM, et al. The ProSeal LMA: results of a descriptive trial with experience of 300 cases. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 534-9
3. Asai T, Kawashima A, Hidaka I, Kawachi S. The laryngeal tube compared with the laryngeal mask: insertion, gas leak pressure and gastric insufflation. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 729-32
4. Ocker H, Wenzel V, Schmucker P, Steinfath M, Dörges V. A comparison of the laryngeal tube with the laryngeal mask airway during routine surgical procedures. Anesth Anaig 2002; 95: 1094-5
5. Miller DM, Youkhana I, Pearce AC. The laryngeal mask and VBM laryngeal tube compared during spontaneous ventilation. A pilot study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18: 593-8
6. Cook TM, McCormick B, Asai T. Randomized comparison of the laryngeal tube and the classic laryngeal mask airway during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth. 2003; (In press)
7. Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J 1985; 32: 429-34
8. Samsoon GLT, Young JRB. Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study. Anaesthesia 1987; 42: 487-90
9. VBM Medizintechnik. Laryngeal tube LT®. Instructions for Use. VBM Medizintechnik GmbH, Sulz, 2001
10. Intavent Limited. LMA ProSeal Instruction Manual. Intavent Limited, 2002
11. Asai T, Brimacombe J. Cuff volume and size selection with the laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 1179-84
12. Verghese C, Berlet J, Kapila A, Pollard R. Clinical assessment of the single use laryngeal mask airway-the LMA-Unique. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 677-9
13. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Brimacombe L. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 770-6
14. Figueredo E, Martinez M, Pintanel T. A comparison of the ProSeal™ Laryngeal Mask and the Laryngeal Tube® in spontaneously breathing anesthetized patients. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 600-5
15. Brain AIJ, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA 'ProSeal'-a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84: 650-4
16. Brain A. Esophageal breathing and upper airway obstruction with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1669-70
17. Genzwuerker HV, Vollmer T, Ellinger K. Fibreoptic tracheal intubation after placement of the laryngeal tube. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 733-8