A randomized controlled trial comparing the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway with the laryngeal tube suction in mechanically ventilated patients

Anesthesiology

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 316-320

  Gaitini, Luis A ^a,d   Vaida, Sonia J ^b   Somri, Mostafa ^c   Yanovski, Boris ^d   Ben David, Bruce ^e   Hagberg, Carin A ^f  

^a Anesthesia Department   (Israel)

^b Obstetric Anesthesia Unit

^c Pediatric Anesthesia Unit   (Switzerland)

^d BNAI ZION MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETIC EQUIPMENT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BREATHING MECHANICS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CUFF; DRAIN; ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE; FIBER OPTICS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OROPHARYNX; OXYGENATION; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SAFETY; STOMACH TUBE;

ADULT; AGED; AIR PRESSURE; ANESTHESIA, INHALATION; BRONCHOSCOPY; CARBON DIOXIDE; FEMALE; FIBER OPTICS; HUMANS; INTUBATION, GASTROINTESTINAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OXYGEN; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM; SUCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 3342958868     PISSN: 00033022     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200408000-00011     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Brain AI, Verghese C, Strube PJ: The LMA "ProSeal"-a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84:650-4
2. Brimacombe J, Keller C: The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. ANESTHESIOLOGY 2000; 93:104-9
3. Evans NR, Gardner SV, James MF, King JA, Roux P, Bennett P, Nattrass R, Llewellyn R, Visu D: The ProSeal laryngeal mask: Results of a descriptive trial with experience of 300 cases. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:534-9
4. Dorges V, Ocker H, Wenzel V, Steinfath M, Gerlach K: The Laryngeal Tube S: A modified simple airway device. Anesth Analg 2003; 96:618-21
5. Oecker H, Wenzel V, Schmucker P, Steinfath M, Dorges V: A comparison of the laryngeal tube with the laryngeal mask airway during routine surgical procedures. Anesth Analg 2002; 95:1094-7
6. Asai T, Kawashima A, Hidaka I, Kawachi S: The laryngeal tube compared with the laryngeal mask: Insertion, gas leak pressure and gastric insufflation. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89:729-32
7. Cook TM, McCormick B, Asai T: Randomized comparison of laryngeal tube with classic laryngeal mask airway for anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91:373-8.
8. Brimacombe J. Keller C, Brimacombe L: A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 770-6
9. Figuerendo E, Martinez M, Pintanel T: A comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask and the laryngeal tube in spontaneously breathing anesthestized patients. Anesth Analg 2003; 96:600-5
10. Cook TM, McKinstry C, Hardy R, Twigg S: Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the laryngeal tube during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91:678-83
11. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Puehringer P: A fibreoptic scoring system to assess the position of laryngeal mask airway devices: Interobserver variability and a comparison between the standard, flexible and intubating laryngeal mask airways (in German). Anaesthesiologie Intensivmedizin Notfalmedizin Schmerz-therapie 2000; 35:692-4
12. Machin D, Campbell M, Payers P. Pinol A: Sample size tables for clinical studies, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1997, p 24
13. Cook TM, Nolan JP, Verghese C, Strube PJ, Lees M, Millar JM, Baskett PJ: Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:527-33
14. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B, Agro F, Rosenblatt W, Dierdorf SF, Garcia de Lucas E, Capdevilia X, Brimacombe N: A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. ANESTHESIOLOGY 2002; 96:289-95
15. Gaitini L, Vaida S, Somri M, Kaplan V, Yanovski B, Markovits R, Hagberg C: An evaluation of the laryngeal tube during general anesthesia using mechanical ventilation. Anesth Analg 2003; 96:1750-5
16. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology Clin N Am 2002; 871-91
17. Evans NR, Gardner SV, James MF: ProSeal laryngeal mask protects against aspiration of fluid in the pharynx. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:584-7
18. Evans NR, Llewellyn RL, Gardner SV, James MF: Aspiration prevented by the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A case report. Can J Anaesth 2002; 49:413-6
19. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Berry A: Gastric insufflation with the ProSeal laryngeal mask. Anesth Analg 2001; 92:1614-5
20. Brimacombe J, Keller C: Aspiration of gastric contents during use of a ProSeal laryngeal mask airway secondary to unidentified foldover malposition. Anesth Analg 2003; 97:1192-4
21. Koay CK: A case of aspiration using the ProSeal LMA. Anaesth Intensive Care 2003; 31:123
22. Brain AIJ, Brimacombe JR, Berry AM, Verghese C: Reflux during positive ventilation via the laryngeal mask airway? Br J Anaesth 1995; 74:489-93
23. Natalini G, Franceschetti ME, Pantelidi MT, Rosano A, Lanza G, Bernandini A: Comparison of the standard laryngeal mask airway and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in obese patients. Br J Anaesth 2002; 90:323-6